SCOTUS: “The Party Is Over”

47 Drain The Swamp 28 Comments

More analysis from Margot Cleveland and Jonathan Turley.

Julie Kelly: Amy Coney Barrett took a blowtorch to KBJ.

Indeed: “We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”

@JonathanTurley …We have our fourth opinion. It is Mahmoud v. Taylor, by Justice Alito. Huge 6-3victory for parental rights over the ability to withdraw their children from LGBTQ lessons. … The Court includes pictures from these books to drive home these points…

28 Replies to “SCOTUS: “The Party Is Over””

  1. ACB went after the DEI hire something fierce. Showed her exactly the level of respect she deserves.

    1. Yep. SCOTUS would be a rough place to be a DEI hire. In any other job you might be able to bluff your way along for quite some time, but at SCOTUS you have to demonstrate your grasp of the Constitution, your knowledge of legal precedent, and your ability to apply sound logic almost every day. It’s obvious that other DEI hire, ‘The Wise Latina’ likes KJB, but I would love to be a fly on the wall in Clarence Thomas’ office to find out what he really thinks of her. I doubt he has much respect for her.

    2. Rogue robed radicals will continue to defy Trump, and now SCOTUS, inventing whatever excuses they can, but their judicial credibility is now extinguished, with the only actual constitutional Court pointing out just because partisan judges believe Trump is exceeding his authority, that doesn’t give them the authority to exceed theirs.

      It’s all been reversible nonsense from the start, so this SCOTUS reality check is welcome, a light now shone on partisan activist judges who feel unless they can usurp a GOP President, as KJB opined, (our) democracy is lost.

      Democracy being synonymous with Democrat rule, proving they don’t actually care about the law, just power.

      1. I’m almost certain that if you’re a judge and you defy SCOTUS, your judge card gets pulled, quickly and permanently. And while I didn’t make the rules for judges, I’m pretty sure that’s one of the top 5: Obey SCOTUS, or you can’t be a judge.

        And I can’t wait to see that to happen…

  3. When Dem0ncr@ps and Lieberals appoint judges, the appointees are almost always failed lawyers. These people manage to pass the Bar exam but absolutely suck at applying law. They have no legal expertise whatsoever. Raising funds for their preferred political party is the only mastered skill. Any ruling by the failed lawyer is based on “feels” and party political dogma.

    The conservative appointees will not always rule the way we want. However, the ruling is always based on law, which the libtard failed lawyer has no concept of.

    1. This is false, Trumps record when there’s a Democrat or Republican appointed judge is virtually identical. The reality is the Trump administration isn’t competent when it comes to executive orders, this was a major problem in his first administration as well.

      He hired too many yes men.

      1. More injunctions were filed against Trump’s executive orders in his first two months of office than were filed against Biden during his entire 4 year term. So as you say, it’s possible that the Trump administration isn’t competent when it comes to executive orders, or it may be that deep state/activist/TDS judges are working together to block Trump’s agenda. I tend to believe the latter, especially given the actions of Judge Jeb Boasberg. He was a FISA court judge who approved wire taps on President Trump during his first term, and he presided over more than 70 January 6th cases. In those J6 cases his conviction rate was 100%, and he gave almost all of the defendants jail time. He also tried to block Trump’s restructuring of USAID, which coincidentally was providing grants which were paying the salaries of his wife and daughter.

  4. I would like to thank the progressive democrats. Without the “No Kings” protests, I don’t know if the USSC would have acted so expeditiously. But, they heard you, and District Courts have lost their collective thrones of power.
    Thank you, you blue haired, tattooed walking pin cushions. I’m in your debt.
    😀

    1. Beautiful summation of the SCOTUS decision about rogue judges –
      “District Courts have lost their collective thrones of power.”

    2. I just heard a freakishly fugly “trans” FAKE woman interviewed by my local leftist news station ahead of this weekends FAAAAB-UUU-LOUS!!! Gay Sex Parade on Sunday … this freak said in a FAKE sing-songey happy voice that the THEME of this years Sex Parade was … RESIST!! RESIST Trump (and all the normies who voted for him).

      We normies continue to get shit done … while the freaks have a parade and party.

  5. “Thank you, you blue haired, tattooed walking pin cushions. I’m in your debt.”
    Perfect

  6. Kate posts …

    The Court includes pictures from these books to drive home these points…

    including a link to these pictures. I click on her link and I get: “Safari can’t open this page, The URL cannot be shown”. I guess the TRUTH cannot allowed by Apple. The TRUTH is too shocking.

    Here is where I remind you that I have been PERMANENTLY BANNED from Conservative Treehouse because I posted a comment saying … “our 11 yo boys should NOT be taught how to sukk cawk in public school” … in response to a reader post indicating his local school board was doing just that. The admin. claimed my “language” was shocking and violated their standards. When In reality I’ve read far worse on those pages. Yes, I phonetically spelled the sex act just as herein.

    So our still somewhat SANE SCOTUS agrees with me, and disagrees with *cough* *cough* “conservative” treehouse who HATED that I spoke out against teaching gay sex to our adolescent boys. Wrap your minds around THAT.

    1. “including a link to these pictures. I click on her link and I get: “Safari can’t open this page, The URL cannot be shown”. ”

      I just get no response at all when clicking on the link. Mousing over it shows nothing.

    2. Kenji, why don’t you give your grousing about Conservative Treehouse a rest. It’s a giant bore.

      The blog owner has decided, so live with it. His blog, his rules. It seems something similar happened not too long ago in this neighborhood.

      1. A so-called “conservative” doesn’t allow free speech. It’s important to understand what “Sundance” values MOST. He demands the freedom to teach little boys how to perform gay sex in the public schools … but SILENCE those who oppose it.

        Yes, please say it again. It’s HIS website … and he operates it exactly how he wishes.

        Thank you for your attention to this matter.

        1. That’s far from the sum total of what Sundance ‘s values are.

          In his world you were a small cog. Get over it.

          Cheers

          2. Lupus, I’m new to this discussion, so help me out:
            Why would you defend someone who claims to be a conservative (but clearly is not), and who censors legitimate comments to (apparently) discourage discourse he doesn’t like?

            If I were Kenji, I would wear a permanent ban from such a website as a badge of honor. And I would trumpet the injustice of being banned pretty much the same way he does. What am I missing?

          3. MT, I defend Sundance because of his insights into and tireless work exposing the Deep State and its machinations., not only domestically but also internationally, for example in Ukraine.

            Also for his unwavering support of MAGA and Trump.

            Also for naming and shaming the bad apples in US politics and abroad, giving precise reasons for his views.

            Finally, I don’t care if he is a conservative or not. What’s important is the work he does.

          4. Kenji, you are certainly not a cog. Why, you don’t even smell like a cog! You must be one of the cog-no-scenti…

  7. I’ll just drop this here …

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/top-stocks/s-p-500-nasdaq-touch-record-highs-after-tame-inflation-data/ar-AA1HxVAy

    Notice that PDJT is not given ANY credit. His name not even mentioned in regard to the Dow and NASDAQ both EXPLODING (sorry Iran) over the past two days. Dow UP UP UP 572 points at the moment. Yeah, and Trump’s announcing names for Jerome Powell’s replacement at the FED has nothing to do with Powell changing his tune. Resistance Puhleeze. Trump Tariff Tantrum Puhleeze.

  8. “The CASA ruling leaves room for judges to order relief akin to a nationwide injunction when a state sues the federal government. ”

    _____________________________________

    What this means is that all the Soros backed Attorney(s) General in Blue and some Red states will sue the Federal Govt. in tandem to provide access to Circuit Courts to apply injunctions once again. I can assure you that the usual suspects are in a private forum right now working out the collaborative details. If you think this is a stretch, just think back to Colorado’s attempt to remove Trump from the ballot through unsubstantiated accusations of insurrection via their Secretary of State and Attorney General. Same with the State of Maine. Most of the hardcore Blue States (NY, Cal, Ill, Wash., Oregon…etc.) will see this as their civic duty.

    1. I don’t believe the Lawfare will end tomorrow. Because that’s ALL the leftists have. They don’t have a winning Policy. They don’t have a winning Candidate. They’re LOSERS and LOSERS sue anyone and everyone they can. We need a LOSERS $pay$ legal system.

      1. I’m told that in cases involving custody of pets, there is a “loser spays” principle.

    2. Yes but the DNC’s Democracy Docket must spend both time and money to achieve this result – no matter who or what the reason Illinois remains firmly committed to PAY TO PLAY at local and state levels. PAY to PLAY is precedent for decades here.

      Meanwhile, the MSM has clutched their collect pearls to the point of strangulation.

  9. Coming up “Federal judge from Hawaii invalidates Supreme Court’s decision”

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation