Legalize the self defense of property and person, and the problem goes away.
Sun- Guns, masks, break-ins: Public safety should be on the ballot
They came with guns and masks. That’s what RCMP are telling us about the criminals who targeted multiple rural properties in Manitoba early Sunday morning. They broke into garages and outbuildings. They stole ATVs, power tools, even a truck. Witnesses believe they were armed. A 17-year-old girl was arrested hours later, alone in a vehicle. The rest are still out there.
If they are wearing masks.. How are you going to know if you are racist or not?.. The slippery slope of just let them take your stuff.. Because then they also want your wife and daughters as well.. Maybe even shoot that barking dog.. Maybe even the entire family.. And I still don’t know if I’m racist or not?.. Talk about a crime..
Or you can just defend your home and property with deadly force and pass on the slippery slope game..
Physical description of the assailants? Just “youths”?
3-2-1 … “it’s only stuff … and stuff can be replaced”
Can I replace my stuff from your garage?
Cheers to Gerald Stanley !!!
Kanadians are too concerned about free stuff to be bothering with law and order issues.
Our Constitution does not enshrine or guarantee our natural rights because the right to use our properly freely within civil society is not directly enumerated, so civic society can interfere, banning bed and breakfasts and “speculator” taxes two of many examples. The status quo collectivists are uninterested in fixing this because as progressives they don’t believe our rights are inalienable, in fact they get to decide when and how to limit them, with the burden of proving and asserting natural rights ours, not theirs.
If you’ve no rights to your property, you have no right to defend it. Own nothing, be happy, give me your guns.
Carny Carney’s “formula” for a national pipeline has a higher threshold than amending our Constitution (7/10 provinces 50%+ population), giving each province and native groups each an effective veto against pipelines.
IOW they will never do it.
If polling bears out and the Liberals win, we are about to enshrine the “Fatal Conceit” of government control on our “Road to Serfdom” of “Shared Misery,” as Conrad Black succinctly summarizes:
“Canada is perilously close to the greatest electoral disaster in its history. A Liberal victory would commit the country to the deliberate pursuit of comparative poverty to reduce Canada’s minimal contribution to the fear of a rise in the world’s temperature due to carbon use. This is insane and must not happen.”
Voters should recall the reasons why the federal Conservatives enjoyed a lead of 29 points prior to the involuntary retirement of Justin Trudeau. The Trudeau government, partially under the intellectual and Mephistophelean influence of Mark Carney, presided over a dangerous net deficit of over $300 billion of excess of capital leaving the country over the amount entering for investment in Canada, while the inflation-adjusted per capita income of the average American has risen at four times the rate of Canadians in the last ten years. This is drastically uncompetitive.”
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/other/conrad-black-a-mark-carney-win-would-be-a-disaster-for-canada/ar-AA1CMTKB?ocid=BingNewsSerp
It’s funny how those who lived long before the ‘progressive movement’ understood the need for law and order.
“Nature, or rather God, has bestowed upon every one of us the right to defend his person, his liberty, and his property, since these are the three constituent or preserving elements of life; elements each of which is rendered complete by the others, and cannot be understood without them.”
— Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850) Source: ‘The Law” published 1850
“The second duty of the sovereign, that of protecting, as far as possible, every member of the society from the injustice or oppression of every other member of it, or the duty of establishing an exact administration of justice”
— Adam Smith (1723 – 1790) Excerpt from The Wealth of Nations Book V, Chapter I, Part II
I’ve read, re-read, and will continue to read “The Law” where Bastiat asserts “Law is justice,” or more accurately, law is preventing unjust interference with and direction of our natural rights to person, property and liberty, who’s second thesis is those who believe humanity will descend into madness and chaos if not directed by “the elected” perfect persons who assume virtue rather than humility, who somehow are not flawed; his third assumption is those who would decide our rights are infallible and we are to be passive, this theory forwarded by those educated in the classics of Greece and Egypt, where all life was directed by philosopher kings:
“It is not to be wondered at that the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries should have looked upon the human race as inert matter, ready to receive everything – form, figure, impulse, movement and life from a great prince, or a great legislator, or a great genius. These ages were reared in the study of antiquity, and antiquity presents everywhere – in Egypt, Greece and Rome, the spectacle of a few men moulding mankind according to their fancy (Me- and their power and wealth), and mankind to this end enslaved by force or by imposture.”
That is a proof that progressivism is regressive and inevitably leads to unenlightened despots, because this is precisely what the self-appointed Jesus’ who decide our existence for ourselves, only them to forgive our sins.
Public safety on the ballot, lol.
Go fck yourself, Klein.
You’re delusional.
The government always makes everything worse.
Time to modernize the young offenders act,,, Make it 9 years and younger!
If the left feels you are mature enough at ten to decide your gender and begin transition through surgery or irreversible drugs to become the opposite sex, then you should be old enough to pay the adult consequences of your illegal activities, and pay back in monetary compensation, or do youth prison.
Rural Canadians need Castle Laws, for anyone who lives further than 15 mins from a rcmp detachment.
Where have you been, Carl? It doesn’t matter if the cop shop in literally on the corner of your street, they still won’t come.
Carl: “Rural Canadians need Castle Laws, for anyone who lives further than 15 mins from a rcmp detachment.”
Make that “15 mins” two-and-a-half seconds. When seconds count, help is just minutes away.
I used 15 mins, because those in urban areas closer to police stations, would never vote in favor of Castle Laws. Even in SK, our cities are full of anti gun ndpers, they’ll never want you to be able to defend yourself. But I think rural people, given a choice, would vote to support Castle Laws for rural areas, if there ever was a plebiscite.
If you don’t have the right to defend yourself and your family with use of deadly force, you probably live in a prison.
Live rural and own a backhoe.
It’s real nice that Kevin Klein is all concerned about rural crime.
Where are he and the Winnipeg Sun on gun control? Right to self defense? Jail time for violent offenders? How about bail and repeat offenders? Drugs cartels?
CRICKETS is what you’ve been hearing from them. Crickets.
Yeah, you want the rural crime to stop? Toss some drug dealers and gang bangers in the can for ten years a piece. Deport some drug cartel a-holes. Maybe, novel idea, don’t let ARMED ROBBERS out on bail.
But if you really want it to stop, pass a Castle Doctrine law. Then it will -stop-.
None of which will never happen. Which proves they’re not serious, so why bother even having the conversation?
Remember
Fire the last two rounds into the ceiling as warning shots