75 Replies to “June 2, 2024: Reader Tips”

    1. Example #17,434,990 that we now live in a BANANA REPUBLIC. Take a bow democrat bootlickers!

      1. “Banana Republic” is such a cliche. Although Guava Kingdom would be a good name for a band.

  1. International Energy Agency

    The global energy crisis that escalated in early 2022 was not caused by clean energy.”

    “When people misleadingly blame clean energy and climate policies for the recent spikes in energy prices, they are, intentionally or not, moving the spotlight away from the main cause – the major cuts that Russia made to natural gas supply.”

    Rebuttal

    “Europe could easily have buffered itself against external supply shocks by encouraging domestic fossil fuel resource development, or going nuclear. They did neither, instead frittering capital on useless renewables, which when tested by the Russian gas embargo proved hopelessly inadequate for the task of maintaining European energy security.”

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/06/01/iea-higher-energy-prices-are-russias-fault-not-renewable-energy/

      1. Hunter biden for i oz of coke and a case of 5.56 mm NATO rounds. The chicoms provided the cash; $50.

        1. “Dementia Joe, that’s who!”

          He even (accidentally) admitted it once.

    1. Sure is a good thing Canada has enough coal, oil and gas for another 500 years. I bet we will exploit that to the benefit of all Canadian born citizens. s/

      1. No VOWG, unfortunately there is no economic case for them there energy supplies. No one wants them.

    2. … the major cuts that Russia the USA made to natural gas supply .

    1. “The current atmosphere of polarization, of toxicity, of misinformation, of disinformation, of anger directed at individuals and institutions is not a healthy trend line for democracy in Canada,” he said in Toronto.

      Trudeau speaker of forked tongues is at it again.

    1. Not unusual, the glass would impede the Germans from taking it back to Berlin

    2. The article has been updated to state that the painting is coved by glass and has suffered no permanent damage.

  2. SHOULD preidents have absolute immunity? Watching Viva Frie and he is now putting forward the concept that elimination of Biden and attributing it to Trump and MAGA kills 2 birds with one stone. This is something I have mentioned numerous times.
    Further to that he was putting forward the idea that a SCOTUS ruling of absolute immunity could end the lawfare and eliminate the criminal conviction of Trump. That ruling would be a nightmare. In the category of be careful what you wish for, who the current President is needs to be taken into account.

    1. No one should have absolute immunity, but everybody should be free from malicious prosecution.

    2. The president should have immunity for everything peripheral to his office. Police have immunity, prosecutors have immunity, judges have immunity, congressmen have immunity, and senators have immunity. But the president doesn’t have immunity??? Elections are within the president’s purview. The Constitution does allow trial after impeachment so the immunity is never absolute. Impeachment is a safeguard that removes political bias by requiring a 2/3 majority. More or less the majority of the minority in the Senate has to approve it.

  3. This is from Kathy Gyngell’s weekly missive. She is editor of the Conservative Woman (excellent publication). I had forgotten this: “Jack Poso reminded me on Twitter that in 2022 Hillary Clinton quietly settled a campaign finance violation over reporting the Steele Dossier funding as legal services. But who cares about fairness amongst the Democrats?”
    Perhaps someone needs to let Biden know that it looks like Dems of a certain pedigree are above the law.

Navigation