Retraction of the Research Article “SARS-CoV-2 S2–targeted vaccination elicits broadly neutralizing antibodies”
After an investigation, the Francis Crick Institute has concluded that fabricated data are present in Fig. 2, B and C, and that falsified images are present in fig. S6. The investigation concluded that the first author, Kevin W. Ng, was responsible for this, and he has admitted responsibility. Further, the existence of data fabrication casts doubt on some other experiments presented in the paper, for which primary data and samples are unavailable, precluding post hoc verification.
“Why most published research findings are still false
94% of medical treatments lack evidence of benefits”
“…..When I say that a lot of research is not useful, I’m talking about research that tries to generate evidence to enable us to treat specific diseases. Multiple factors make that kind of research very unreliable at times.
For example, there are very strong conflicts of interest. There is research that is run with a specific ideology in mind. There is very poor use of statistical methods and questionable research practices that lead to “significant” results that are not really significant. There is a lot of uncontrolled bias. There are poor study designs. There is fragmentation of research in small studies that are meaningless, where if they do get some signal, it’s very likely that it will be false.”
https://iai.tv/articles/john-ioannidis-ai-is-generating-false-fraudulent-and-fake-medical-research-auid-3703?_auid=2020
Rats with gargantuan genitalia hardest hit.
Which is why the “appeal to authority” fallacy is one. The reproducibility of medical studies has been a shambles for decades. Crying “but but but muh peer review” is meaningless. The data’s hopelessly corrupted, and so are the reviewers.
The fraud was exposed the hard way.
In practice, the ClotShot did not work and has shown harm, injury and death, despite the faux protestations of various agents, players, bots and corrupt politicians and their minions.
The BC CDC Donut charts clearly showed the data that proved these shots were ineffective garbage at best. By June of 2022, 91% of BC deaths were in the Jabbed.
Official Data. Many of us screen captured these official charts.
Would love to post them here, but can’t. They can be found on X.
The NDP disappeared the data from the public in July 2022, as if it had never existed. Just what criminals do, hide the evidence.
Gone into the vapours. The data charts destroyed their false, murderous narrative.
That’s not how any drug or treatment works, unless it was planned to be……..
Nuremburg 2.0
I feel that we are all -extremely- lucky that a lot more people didn’t die from that shot. I f-ing warned them, and they took it anyway, because why listen to -me- when the government says it’s okay?
So here we are, and I’m giving thanks to the Almighty that it wasn’t worse.
But also, here we are. The #Lieberal government lied about Ivermectin, they lied about HCQ, they lied about the Mad Science jab, and they even lied about the disease. Not once but constantly for two years, and they are STILL LYING to this day.
And -nobody- has gone to jail. Nobody that I know of has even been fired. They’re all still working there.
Not only lying To This Day, but, ensuring their court and legal system is also acting as the Gatekeeper of all things sacrosanct.
The legal decisions from some judges beggar belief. Example, the CSASPP (BC Nurses) was denied their suit, for a litany of obscure reasons, many of which are contradictions that the judge told them to add and update, then criticized adding and updating them!! Yes’ it’s being Appealed.
The non-decisions are dragged out as long as possible so as to discourage and bankrupt the funding of those chasing justice. Example, the BCPS group (fired public employees) are still waiting decision on allowing a Class Action, 18 months since submission and counting.
Don’t tell me it’s not all co-ordinated behind the scenes between the corrupt players, government and gatekeepers.
Charter Rights BE DAMNED.
Read Section 1. There are no Charter Rights.
Fist Bump.
I witnessed the goon squads beat up the Convoy protesters.
I’m aware of the MOOT decision of Pickford and Max’ Charter travel challenge.
It’s Toilet Paper.
“I feel that we are all -extremely- lucky that a lot more people didn’t die from that shot.”
Perhaps many of the vials had distilled water.
The next question is who fabricated the data?
Even if the retracted study were valid, it doesn’t show what people took it to mean. Notice “produce neutralizing antibodies” not “effective at preventing Covid infection”.
When they released the preliminary results of the Pfizer study in Nov 2020 they said the vaccine was 95% effective in preventing infection and safe because there were more AEs in the placebo arm, they cited the antibody response in the vaccine arm.
About a month later they vaccinated the placebo arm (for “humanitarian” reasons) effectively ending the trial even though the trial design had them monitoring participants for long term safety for another 2 years.
All of the trials after that, to expand the vax to other age groups and test new versions as the virus mutated, were smaller and only designed to look for the antibodies. If the antibody response mirrored the Nov 2020 prelim results, the “safe and effective” was assumed based on the fact that is what Nov 2020 showed.
What they have never talked about much, is that MORE data existed from the time between when theprelim results were captured and when the placebo arm was vaxxed. That data had a lot more cases than the Nov 2020 results, and the data for “effectiveness” did not even reach statistical significance and there were more AEs including a few deaths in the vaccinated arm than there were in the control arm (so it was not safe)
So, the initial vax was never safe and effective, and the later versions weren’t even tested to see if they were.
Never mind the fact that the Pfizer Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for an Unapproved Product
Review Memorandum was full of enough holes to drive Chris Barber’s Big Red through.
Multiple “red flags”
4 cases of Bell’s Palsy among the vaccinated but none among the controls. FDA allowed them to ignore that. They also didn’t say what kind of thing they were defining as “Bell’s Palsy.” Check out Carrie Sakamoto to see what Pfizer induced “Bell’s Palsy” looks like.
Table 2, page 18. 311 cases vs 60 placebos excluded for protocol deviations. That’s five times as many cases as controls. In a good study those should have been about the same. What happened to the extra people excluded? Did Pfizer classify dying between the first and second shot as dropping out due to a protocol deviation?
Table 4 (page 20) demographics of the study participants did not match population
Antibody dependent enhancement dismissed without specifying how or why even though that was a major problem in all previous forms of vaccine in animals.
(Table 8, page 25) Relative risk not absolute risk. Absolute risk reduction was very small, almost nothing.
36 year old male with no medical comorbidities who developed what appeared to be full blown COVID. The symptoms began on Day 2 after the second shot. Attributed to false negative COVID or another infectious process or adverse vaccine reaction.
“Suspected COVID-19 cases within 7 days (and due to the 14 day rule, 21 in Sask and BC they would have so conveniently for Pfizer been counted as unvaccinated) after vaccination 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group.” Statistically this group was too small (lacked power) to detect if the vaccine was causing people to develop COVID like symptoms but the fact that many more people in the vaccinated group got COVID should have been a huge danger sign that required more follow up.
Even ignoring everything else about this vaccine, how any regulator could possibly have approved this jab is utterly incomprehensible. It was either gross incompetence/negligence or corruption or both.
$Doctor$ $Are$ $Baffled$.
Sure they were SAFE!!!!
Pfizer Psaid Pso.
They were tested on 8 mice after all.
What’s the problem?
The worst part is that government health officials continue to push the mRNA gene therapy clot shot. Most astonishing is that the “Elbows Up!” retards still line up for it.
While driving through London the other day, I saw a pharmacy sign advertising for the flu shot and the “new” Covid vaccine. The “new” shot must be Nuvaxovid, “the only protein-based, non-mRNA vaccine in Canada.” It uses “a purified recombinant protein” so it’s still gene therapy. And, yes, people will still line up for it.
They ARE the science experiment, the lab rats.
It’s still underway.
Fine, let the lemmings submit to their decline.
#1. There is no threat from the current “Covid” virus to the unjabbed. Period. It’s innocuous. #2. However, in a perverse twist of fate, the addicted jabbers suffer from the IGg4 effect. In essence, the effect of allergy shots, whereby frequent injections of a noxious substance causes the body to reduce, or eliminate over time, an immune response. The IGg4 effect. The jabbed can still get severe disease because of the Covid shot.
Nice, huh?
A Landmark Civil Lawsuit in The Netherlands
https://thenetherlandscase.com/