Jeffrey Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself

Bill's Wife 26 Comments

The New York Times, doing their best to get ahead of a story.

Related awkwardness.

Update — Starmer feeling heat: 10 Downing Street threatens to sack all Cabinet ministers unless they tweet out their support for UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer by the end of the day, a Scottish Labour source tells Channel 4 News.

26 Replies to “Jeffrey Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself”

  1. Hey NYT, I correct your Headline.
    “CLINTON RAPED CHILDREN BUT MAXWELL HELPED HIM” Soooo.

  2. Thank You Democrat Reps and Senators, Republican Rep Thomas Massie and former Republican Rep Marjorie Green for your triumph in getting the Epstein Files released. Some surprises, eh.
    ,

    1. What’s your point?
      The Demoncraps had the entire four years of the Brandon Administration to release the Epstein files and DID NOT.

      1. Point is the Epstein files release was to trap President Trump and that was the goal of the Democrats, Massie and Green.
        Instead among the fish caught so far are UK Ambassador Peter Mandelson (the king maker behind Tony Blair and Gordon Brown), UK PM Starmer, the Labour Party and the Clintons. Looking forward to catching more big fish in the Epstein net at home and abroad.

        1. Forgot the role of legacy media, including global media, who focused pretty exclusively on President Trump and covered up for the Clintons, Bill Gates et al.

        2. Don’t forget Elizabeth Warren’s husband…

          After she demanded the release of the files.

  3. I think that the peek into Epstein’s file people are starting to see just how dirty the political class and the MSM really are.

  4. Slimey business, but we already knew that. Still, truly actionable content really isn’t there, (or at least in the emails I’ve seen that raise chatter) it’s coded talk. There may be more there there in the financial transactions, but I confess I’ve spent little time on it, and am just surfing the froth — which is of course, contaminated by gigabytes of fakery.

    1. Hmmmm…”coded talk” eh?- where have I heard that before? Oh yeah. The story involving that Washington D.C. hole in the wall, pizza joint without a basement.
      I don’t know about anyone else but when my personal physician tells me to take my hard-on pills before you and him go out for the night to get some “Pizza and grape soda”, it means exactly that. Pizza and grape soda.
      Let’s move along.

        1. Mark Steyn for one finds that specifying a certain drink when you invite somebody to go for pizza is rather odd.

          As I do. I don’t tug at my forelocks in existential angst over “misreporting”. If anyone in the media or maybe John Podesta himself wants to step forward and provide an explanation for those terms contained in his own emails disclosed by wikileaks, which btw, no one has claimed to be fake…I’m all ears.
          In the meantime you’ll excuse me if Epstein’s reference to “pizza and grape soda” is what I think it is.

  5. “Its a big club and you ain’t in it.”

    Thankfully.
    Because if you are, know that Hell must be fed.

  6. How many people who visited Epstein’s island also donated to the Clinton foundation? And how much?

  7. How did it get to this?

    There is a historical parallel

    Back around the time the Pope was hiring a contractor to repaint the ceiling, (aka the renaissance) he needed a way to pay for not only the renovations but to fund all the other stuff a potentate of that time expected.
    Hence the great idea of selling indulgence came about.

    My point?
    If it wasn’t Epstein it would (and likely still is) someone else setting up shop for the hoipaloi in exchange for their virtue (and the influence that knowledge buys).

    The question isn’t who visited Epstein’s island, it’s whose island are they visiting now?
    Because nature abhors a vacuum

  8. Huh!?

    So NOW I know why virtually NONE of Maxwell’s trial was made public. Can’t have the public or Press see what a sham it was. “Protect victims” my ass … they were protecting their own fraudulent prosecution of Maxwell. Quick! Name all the Madames who are serving 25 year sentences in Federal prison. Heidi Fleiss … the most famous Madame of the modern era served 20 months in Dublin, CA jail (near me) … for TAX EVASION, not “sex crimes”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidi_Fleiss

    Heidi Fleiss was … in contemporary parlance … a “sex trafficker”. Oh! But you say … she didn’t “traffick children for underage sex”. OK … now PROVE that Maxwell did. Huh? All the “child victims” have had their identities and testimony hidden … for their “protection”. So we don’t know any details of their actual involvement. We have no transcripts of cross examination by Maxwell’s attorneys, nada. So we CANNOT ever be an “alternate” on her jury … because the public knows NOTHING.

    Yeah, this whole sordid story isn’t about sex as much is it about money and power, and blackmail. They’re ALL blackmailing each other … and Maxwell needed to be silenced.

    PS … I believe the Trump Admin. moved Maxwell to an alternate prison to SAVE HER LIFE, as she likely was planned to become another dead Federal Prison inmate … after the cameras were shut off, and guards fell asleep from surfing porn all evening.

  9. Would it be outside of norm to think that the two got closer than close?
    One would think that the guy would be much pleased with the woman as opposed to the other woman, his spouse.

  10. Re: the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky … barely legal … sexual affair. The Democrats chided … “it’s only sex” in their attempt to excuse Clinton’s pathetic behavior.

    Yet, they are attempting to make the Epstein “Files” into the most awful “sex crimes” in the history of the planet. Because “underage” “children” were involved. Really? Prove it. Ages, dates, sex acts. Sorry, but that’s how we JUDGE guilt in our country … via due process … in PUBLIC … not hidden-away in some Deep State kangaroo court.

    1. Well, there’s this:

      “The [Wall Street] Journal said its review found that over two dozen names of MINOR VICTIMS were exposed. “Their full names were available Sunday afternoon in the Justice Department’s keyword search, along with personally identifying details that make them readily traceable, including home addresses,” the article said.

      Anouska de Georgiou, an Epstein victim WHO TESTIFIED AGAINST GHISLAINE MAXWELL, “said she contacted the Justice Department this weekend after learning that her personal information was made public in the release, including a picture of her driver’s license,” the Journal wrote.” (Caps mine)

      From:

      https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/doj-released-epstein-files-with-dozens-of-nudes-and-victims-names-reports-say/

      1. ” While the people in the photos were young, “it was unclear whether they were minors,” the article said.”

        Best to read the article first.

        Last I checked … “young” is not illegal. Clinton prefers them aged 19

        And if these “young” women were underaged then where are the CRIMINAL cases against the men who actually statutorily raped them? Dum dum de dum dum dum

        1. I did read the article. Your quote says “unclear” which doesn’t contradict the WSJ one that specifically says “minor victims”.

          As for “where are the criminal cases” why don’t you ask Trump’s DOJ.

          1. Biden had the Epstein “Files” for 4-years. So there’s that …
            But I guess their DOJ was preoccupied at destroying Trump … not seeking Justice of any sort whatsoever …

            Oh! Pardon me … they prosecuted P. Diddy for excessive use of baby oil or something. Yeah … flying hot, sexy, women to do hot sex acts at rave sex parties … trafficking them down the congested freeways of LA. Unh huh …

            Department of … selective … Justice.

          2. Wait! You’re right! Trump hating (R) KY Rep. Massie says he read names of 9yo!! victims of Epstein. And 11yo’s … 12yo’s … 14yo’s … all associated with elite names!!

            https://mol.im/a/15544025

            What Rep. Massie did NOT call for, or introduce as a Congressional motion … is the DEMAND that the DOJ immediately begin prosecution of every sex crime against 9yo’s. To tell the FBI to make cases against every single “elite name” on the Epstein “List”.

            Why not? We’re talking 9yo little girls getting fkcued by “elite men” … “important men” … and we’re doing NOTHING about it? That’s not who we are.

            Well … I have my own pet theories why … including the possibility those 9yo’s may be little Haitian girls “saved” post earthquake and trafficked to Epstein island by the Clintons. The Deep State wouldn’t want THAT level of government corruption to get exposed.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation