40 Replies to “Jeffrey Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself”

  1. And managed to do it all the while getting certain people to stick their necks out, people who will likely take the brunt of any blowback (which is coming).

  2. It’s really quite remarkable. The whole “Me-Too” movement blew up so many media Democrat shills and Hollywood types– all while trying to get Trump. The heads that will swing through the Epstein release hopefully will rival it– and I’ll take heads from both parties in America and whatever globalists we can scoop up as well.

    1. Keep waiting and hoping then. The bill passed only got that unanimous vote because the Democrats get to limit what is released, which means the Republicans were ok with that limiting. People are going to be feeling let down because much will be redacted.

      But the video from Congressional Democrats that came out in the last 24 hours is interesting.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Iux161DZAA

        1. Read the comment below, realize that the file drop that’s causing the Democrats pain at the moment was by the Republicans, and that this bill passed unanimously (only 1 vote against I believe).
          In short, it’s going to be a big shiney nothingburger.

          There is information that is quite valuable, but it wasn’t getting out, and the Democrats (and some Republicans) don’t want other information getting out — the files released by this bill will be heavily redacted…nothing really new.
          Now, that information is quite useful still, but we’ll just have to see what happens, no sense letting those cats out of the bag…yet…or perhaps ever. (hint: Jefferey’s sexual predilections and the sexy escapades of the rich and powerful aren’t the real good stuff; it did/does keep the public titillated though).

          Of course, there will be caterwauling that there’s a coverup by my President. May I posit a notion? If certain congressmen and women are so invested in ‘justice’ and have The Names!(TM)…then why didn’t they just go ahead and release them? In a world that worships the Brave Whistleblower!(TM), why nothing after all these years?
          Political grandstanding and diversion is such a banal thing.

          1. Because those ‘names’ released by the Democrats will SUE the living shit out of anyone who dares slander their names with false accusations. So … may I suggest on the heels of ‘the names’ … comes the indictments … with things like charges, and evidence. Otherwise … our government debt just went up a few hundred more $B’s

  4. Those expecting a quick release of meaningful data might want to lower their expectations a tad.

    They just released the Amelia Earhart files. She died 88 years ago!

  5. High School Theater.
    The classified information will be withheld so Democrats can drag this farce out longer and next begin a clamor to “release the classified Epstein files”. Most revealing is that when Burchett called for the Epstein files to be released Democrats did not support him.

    1. Trust me, they would regret demanding the classified files released — that’s one of the things they (and others) are worried about.

      Maybe there’s a reason that psyop Julian starting warming up his pipes again.
      “look over here!” 😉

  7. Comedy Relief From Jasmine Crockett
    Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) provided some unintentional comic relief right before the House decided to give her fellow Democrat, Stacey Plaskett, a pass regarding her dealings with Jeffrey Epstein.
    But in a development that will surprise no one, Crockett got her ‘facts’ wrong. The Washington Free Beacon’s Chuck Ross took her advice and dug up the FEC filings and discovered that a completely DIFFERENT Epstein made these donations, not the deceased p*dophile.
    Chuck Ross on X: “Oof. @JasmineForUS is disastrously wrong here. None of these donors are *the* Jeffrey Epstein. Several are from the same Dr. Jeffrey Epstein, and the donations to Lee Zeldin are from after *the* Epstein killed himself. https://t.co/RES7GyTQMy https://t.co/OSuTywr3D7” / X
    https://x.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1990996259721588838?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1990996259721588838%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2025%2F11%2Frep-jasmine-crocketts-effort-smear-republicans-epstein-donations%2F

  8. Let’s recap, shall we?

    1. JP Morgan Chase ‘settled’ a lawsuit brought by 100 ‘victims’ of Epstein for $290M because why? Oh yeah, Epstein banked at Chase … and Chase ‘should have known’ that Epstein trafficked underage girls. Because he used their Bill Pay system to pay electricity bills in the Virgin Islands?

    2. But ALL the Democrats who solicited campaign money from Epstein had no idea Epstein trafficked underage girls? Nor did Haaavaaad, or MIT.

    3. The “pain” all these victims feel … even today … as they hold up their ‘Trayvon Martin’ 12yo photos of themselves (TM NYT) … wasn’t mitigated by an estimated $1M payout? Those orgasms paid handsomely … faked or not. Oh. They just laid there, expressionless, or weeping softly as they got raped? Really? How do I know they didn’t? Because Epstein had quite a thriving underage sex business … and I doubt that business would have thrived without willing participants who gave the FULL Disneyland Matterhorny thrill ride. Sorry, it’s crude and titillating… yet truthful.

    4. The “victims” refuse to name … and to file charges against the ACTUAL men who ‘raped’ them statutorily or otherwise … because they fear for their lives? So the pocket change from JP Morgan is easy money … but prying it out of fatso Reid Hoffman can be dangerous? Really? Once enough of you all go fully transparent … fully public in a large group … the kind of public exposure that will give you public (if not government) protection?

    5. Or is it that you are unable to make a credible case against anyone. You were either a willing participant, or lied about your age, or got paid a shitload of money, perks, and prestige by both Epstein and your rich, powerful, famous ‘Johns’? PS … I want to be PROVEN wrong. I want to be corrected that these girls are all the poor, poor, victims they claim to be. But they need to prosecute their perpetrators. They need to go FULLY transparent and public with the horrors and details of their sex slavery [sic].

    6. I’m not just banging on (sorry) about the titillating (sorry) elements of this story for prurient thrills. No. As unknown Jane just said … the Epstein “Files” will be nothing but a heavily redacted nothingburger. Because … Government secrets? Protecting powerful people? Protecting “the chilllllldren victims”? It is apparent to me that the government isn’t gonna name names or anything else in this case … so it is up to “the girls” to name names, file lawsuits, launch vigorous discovery, hold publicly televised trials … and do the job the government just won’t do.

    This whole sordid Epstein operation has been sanitized by calling it “sex trafficking”. No, it was the systematic grooming, and fkcuing of underage girls … as heinous as any RAPE gang in the UK. At least Tommy Robinson has the balls (sorry) to call it by its rightful name. Whereas we’ve sanitized the operation in some eye-glazing legal-speak. Start prosecuting the ACTUAL rapists NOW!

    1. Well, yes and also no.

      The rapists, while prurient and disgusting, are not the really big story — and likely some of them may very well get named. Sadly, the victims will remain victims I’m afraid; they’re probably smart to just keep their mouths shut — no sense paying even more of a price after all.
      It’s Jefferey’s international travels and dealings that are the real story, and there’s a lot of unnoticed finger pointing going on there: a successor to Wikileaks (Distributed Denial of Secrets — cute name) let go of some information months back with regards to that (good old Reason magazine reported on it a few months after the drop). The information is juicy, in a gossipy sort of way, but the interesting thing is why that information and why the timing?
      Look over here, and not there 😉

      https://reason.com/2025/08/27/inside-jeffrey-epsteins-spy-industry-connections/

      1. Well then, shall we all dispense with the ‘sex-trafficking’ nomenclature? Shall we dispense with our sympathies for ‘the girls’ … because as Bill Clinton opined after splooging all over a subordinate 19yo intern … “it’s only sex”. Yeah, yeah, at least she was barely legal.

        So this isn’t really a story about ‘the girls’ or ‘rape’ or sex-trafficking. Nope. It’s a story about RICH POWERFUL people like Peter Thiel, some sketchy Israeli dude and a whole bunch of Putin-adjacent Russians who were doing lots of murky things.

        The idea that by getting the Epstein “Files” … the American people will be GETTING all those evil, rich, powerful, murky, Jews and Russians … and Trump! Is the most absurd fantasy fueled by Trump haters like Big-L Libertarian Reason magazine. SMH.

        I’m far more worried about our Deep State of unchecked bureaucrats than I am about Peter Thiel or even creepster Jeffrey Epstein. Why? Well, because I’m not a 14yo girl seeking fame, fortune, and getting paid to have sex, nor am I a potential client (and blackmail victim) of Epstein’s girls. However, I cannot escape the direct impact of an unregulated rogue Deep State that has weaponized the government against my own personal life.

        Just another distraction from things that REALLY MATTER … and affect your daily life.

    2. Well said, Kenji.

      I was on the fence about the whole thing (teen aged prostitution is nothing new) until the the supposed ‘victims’ held their press conference where they threatened to release the names if the government didn’t. So DO IT, then….stop talking about it, and DO IT. It’s about ‘justice’, right?

      No? Not willing to give up the *millions of dollars* you were paid to keep quiet?

      Then I have no sympathy for you, sorry.

      1. You’re overly emotional.
        The sex trafficking? Of course, it’s awful. Justice should happen? Yes, it should — likely won’t now thanks to all the time and this show of care from Congress. The world is indeed a fallen and harsh place.
        As for the “trollops” as some of you name them — well, that’s rather unchivalrous, probably wouldn’t be saying that if it was your grand-daughter, but…I don’t blame them for keeping their mouths shut, not because of loss of money; they could wind up having unfortunate accidents — why stick your neck out, huh? Could you blame them? And I’m sure some more money has been thrown their way — and that’s really all they’ll get out of this, so might as well; could you blame them if you were in their shoes?
        The “murky Jew” was Ehud Barak — then PM of Israel. (by the way, you said that, not me)
        The Russians don’t need introduction.
        And those names and the emails attached to them were leaked for a reason — and that’s the thing that really interests me, of course.

        Epstein’s wheelings and dealings if foreign countries could have affected our everyday lives — just the released e-mails about the Democrats show that he was trying to help the Democrats (and some Republicans) if not get rid of the President, at least hamstring him. That would very much affect us; it did affect us; could have been worse. And we still don’t know what sort of chaos can be done with them, so could get worse.

        And yes, it was in Reason (hence: good old Reason — it wasn’t a term of endearment to clarify). Also Dropsite News:
        https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/jeffrey-epstein-ehud-barak-putin-israel-russia-syria-war-depose-assad?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web

        And I suppose you know who helps to fund them (hint: his name is George). Again, why leak those, and not others?

        Mind expansion is a wonderful thing…Verbum vincit!

        1. Dang. I haven’t used the word trollop yet. I wish I had. Jane, you ignorant … Nevermind. Jane, you’re a woman and it is only right that you have the backs of your fellow sisters. But I’m a man … and I have lots of personal and observational experience with women who wield their sex as a ‘tool’ and a ‘weapon’ and a meal ticket. It’s only natural. I’m not necessarily saying there’s anything wrong with that. One uses the gifts and talents God has graced them with. And yes … I have observed the YOUNGEST of girls … even my daughters own middle school classmates who were already ridden more miles than Kate’s old motorcycle. And less I blame our “culture” … I would suggest this is a story as old as mankind. At least once we became aware of our nakedness.

          And let me say my one daughter would NEVER have been a trollop as she was raised with morality, decency, and self pride. Sadly, I have little or no control over my one granddaughter however her father was raised with the same values as my daughter.

          It’s not wrong to consider the source of “leaks” (which cannot be verified via metadata and whatnot) as everyone has an axe to grind and a narrative to push. And correct me if I’m wrong … but the author of Virginia G’s. autobiography claims she knows the name of another VERY famous and “dangerous” man who ‘raped’ Virginia … but she’s “afraid” to say his name out loud. Then some friend of hers blurted out the name – Ehud Barak. OK … there’s the FIRST name of an accused “rapist”. Time to file charges, eh? But it’s never gonna happen, is it? Because Mossad or something?

          Sounds like “the victims” hold the keys. Time to name names and file charges … let Discovery begin … and we won’t have to read Reason rag anymore.

          1. Oh Kenji, you don’t know me.

            I consider the age of said women at the time — it’s very easy to manipulate people, especially the young. And yes, many willingly go along with it because they don’t consider the consequences of what sort of game they’re getting into. Doesn’t make it right though, does it?
            Consider this my Christian sensibilities coming to the fore.
            By the way, there were young men who were likely involved as well, so the gender dichotomy may not be exact.

            And Ehud Barak? He was a mark. And that goes for all the rest of them too. People like Epstein (and his handlers) don’t really have friends; they have people who could be useful. You’d think they’d be a bit more circumspect as they should all know this, but perhaps Jeffery was a very good face man and procurer of goodies (all kinds).

            And it does entail issues related to national security for my country, which is yours too. So…here we all are. That’s the thing I really care about.

  10. Not totally on board with the ol’ “Trump is playing 3D chess” canard. Trump was against releasing the files before he was for it, hence his sh** fight with Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert. Someone likely whispered in his ear about the mid terms coming up so he’d better get on board.
    Next flip flop prediction : The H-1B visa program. That’s a pretty big enchilada, almost as big or bigger than the Epstein business. If he’s looking for an excuse to keep Republican voters home on election night, making the wrong decision here will do it.

    1. What you’re missing Burton, is Trump’s motives for NOT releasing “The Files”. Conventional wisdom is that he was hiding BAD revelations about his connections with Epstein. So why is he no longer worried about that and shrugs off the release of “The Files”? That doesn’t make sense … unless you believe the documents will be heavily redacted and selectively released … which is the Bill the Democrats crafted.

      No. Trump has never had anything substantive to do with Epstein, and he fears NOTHING by the release of the files. Prove me wrong. Ohhhhhhhhhhh mommmmmaaaaa … LOOK at those PHOTOS of Trump and Epstein! The same three photos posted publicly, thousands of times per day!

      1. Yeah Global posts the same picture every nigh saying “Trump wa mentioned in the files…” That picture is about 30 years old, before Trump threw him off his properties, but they never mention that..

    2. There was no 3D chess; just an estimation of what would happen. And it has. Kenji’s right — the public is likely going to be upset that nothing big comes of this.
      But…you never know, something might.

      1. PS … UJane … you KNOW I like you and respect you … so I’m not trying to argue you into anything. I’m just expressing my observations. Nothing more. I actually read the Reason post (although a bit hard to follow) and appreciate that you posted it.

        1. The Reason post is an attempt at narrative framing — something to be placed out there, and then people will pick it up and think they found something…eureka!
          It’s a diversion, and a decent one. Same with the other article. Now, what exactly they’re trying to divert people’s gaze from, that’s a good question. Maybe we’ll all find out eventually; then again, maybe not.

          That’s why I pointed them out.
          Sometimes you have to look at what isn’t said more closely than what is.

          And please don’t tell me you respect me….you just called me ignorant a few posts up.
          PS. that other article comes from a media site that’s funded by an organization funded by Open Society; think they have an agenda?

  11. Check out the story of Larry Summers. Ex Clinton treasury secretary, ex President of Harvard, now ex member of Open AI board. Texted and met with Epstein a lot. Asked for dating advice for cheating on his wife in order to bang the daughter of a CCP High mucky-muck. The wife was texting Epstein to get money for a project, etc. A glorious mess. Lefties wanted document released? Here ya go.

  12. The President signed the bill to release the Epstein papers this evening.
    We’ll know in a month at most how redacted it is.

    For the record, whatever the girls (boys too?) motives are, many of them were under 18 years at the time of these events, and cannot legal agree to having sex with the old boys, regardless of political affiliation, or if they are in fact “trollops” or worse.

    89% of Epstein’s flow of funds went to Democrats, let’s see why that is… It’s of no consequence to me if it leads to Mossad, or the ex PM of Israel, or Big Gov’t, or Big Biz, or Andrew of the UK. I just want to read the denials, what sort of excuses they use to explain why their saggy wives weren’t “good enough”. There’s an election cycle every 2 years in the USA, let’s see how the Democrat candidates respond when they’re ONLY ASKED about this and NOTHING ELSE and we’ll see how long it takes for them to lash out incoherently that nobody asks them of the REAL issues… and then I’ll ask them if they were named in the redacted sections, if they enjoyed having sex with young teens while their infected wife was sitting at home wondering… “why do I itch, and is that red spot trying to tell me something?”

    The President, has nothing to worry about. The rest of the GOP? Maybe some will have something to worry about, it’ll all come out in the wash.

    The 3 letter agencies? They’ve had Hunter Biden’s laptop for years, they’ve had Anthony Weiner’s laptop for years, they’ve known “Russia Russia Russia” was a fabrication since it started… they’ve had James O’Keefe’s cellular devices for years and it’s not certain the FBI even knows where they are now…
    The US Gov’t has as many unresolved controversies as Canada does, I’m fine with seeing their dirty laundry, especially in the years since Senator Ted Kennedy stopped making the front of National Enquirer and desperately tried to sober up. “Above the fold” as they used to say..

    1. Trollops or not … the government can bring statutory rape charges even without the support or testimony of the actual victims. However, they will never win a single case without things like evidence and proof, such as testimony of the actual victims. Hence, the raped victims MUST cooperate and participate. Don’t give me the “little girls are scared and need to be protected” crap. Stand up for yourselves … other potential victims … and righteousness. You’re all grown women now with fat bank accounts thanks to Chase Bank, Deutsche’ Bank, and the Epstein estate … all of which paid $M’s in “settlement” money.

      If I may add … the 3-letter agencies also had/have ALL of Trump’s would be assassin’s social media commentary, and multiple phones. Yet … they incredulously claimed they didn’t. And claimed he was a ghost. Yeah … a CIA ghost. Enabled by the FBI and SS.

    3. The Democratic Socialists of America are already lining up to primary quite a few of these idiots. The establishment Dems are likely cooked unless they can pull off some miraculous hat trick that they are far too stupid to pull off.
      And the right has to contend with the clown car that is Marjorie Taylor Greene, Thomas Massie, and the Fuentes road show…plus the neocons who seem to want to play along with the road show by screaming about it.
      On top of all of that there are some foreign entities that are acting very cagey due to their own dumb decisions to go playing footsie with the Clintons amongst others (which one should never do).

      2026 is going to be very fun.
      Don’t worry, Canada won’t be left out — there’s even a Canadian angle with Epstein. He was quite the busy man.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation