“The IEA’s bold assertions have had a rendezvous with reality”

Bloomberg: IEA Now Says Oil Consumption Could Keep Growing to 2050

The International Energy Agency further tempered its stance on an imminent peak in oil demand, reinstating a scenario in which global consumption keeps growing to the middle of the century.

While oil demand was set to plateau or fall this decade in all three scenarios the IEA examined last year, the latest report reintroduces a “Current Policies Scenario” in which consumption rises 13% by 2050. The stronger outlook hinges on a slower pace of electric vehicle adoption.

The revival of the CPS after a five-year hiatus marks the latest revaluation of oil’s long-term prospects by the agency and the wider energy industry. It also comes at a time when the White House is held by an administration that both champions fossil fuels and attacks renewable energy sources.

Forecasts from the Paris-based IEA — established following the 1973 oil shock — are used globally as a benchmark by governments and energy companies for planning policy and investments. The agency’s analysis may provide sobering reading for delegates gathering in Brazil this week for the United Nations-sponsored climate talks known as COP30.

The report on Wednesday is another shift in tone for the agency, which in September said that billions of dollars need to be invested in new oil and gas supplies — having previously drawn fire for saying that such investment was incompatible with climate goals. Republican lawmakers have assailed the agency and sought to cut its funding.

“The main reason we have two new scenarios is the growing uncertainties in the political, economy and energy context,” Executive Director Fatih Birol said in a phone interview from the agency’s Paris headquarters. He pushed back on suggestion that the revival of the CPS was due to US pressure.

The IEA’s latest outlook is consistent with a trend across the energy industry. In September, BP Plc pushed back projections that consumption could top out as early as this year.

In addition to CPS, the report continues to include the Stated Policies Scenario, or STEPS, in which oil demand peaks around 2030. The report didn’t prioritize any pathway as being more likely.

“One major determinant of future oil demand is electrification of the transport sector,” Birol said. “It will depend on government policies”

Electric Vehicles

In CPS, global oil consumption climbs from roughly 100 million barrels a day to 113 million in 2050, as the share of EVs in total global car sales broadly plateaus after 2035. In STEPS, the share of EV sales is projected to double by 2030 and rise above 50% five years later. The CPS scenario poses a drag on growth in wind and solar energy, and a stronger trajectory for natural gas.

Inevitably, the two paths entail different consequences for world oil markets and prices. In the CPS, “higher demand mops up any excess oil and LNG supply more quickly,” bolstering oil prices to about $90 a barrel in 2035. Meeting the demand will require roughly 25 million barrels per day of new projects, and supplies from producers currently subject to sanctions.

The demand scenario for oil and gas is further proof the road to net zero by the middle of the century will be bumpier than previously anticipated, with ramifications for the environment. Global temperatures will rise to almost 3C above pre-industrial levels by the end of the century in CPS, compared with 2.5C in the other pathway. Both options spell a level of climate change that scientists consider extremely destructive.

Later Peak

The IEA’s reappraisal was welcomed by the OPEC oil producer cartel, which has repeatedly assailed the IEA and accused it of promoting an “anti-oil narrative.” The organization, which is led by Saudi Arabia, forecasts that demand for the commodity will keep expanding to 2050.

“The IEA’s bold assertions have had a rendezvous with reality,” OPEC’s Vienna-based secretariat said on its website. The agency’s former “tendency to proclaim imminent peaks at every opportunity amounts to little more than a slogan,” it added.

Even within the IEA’s less bullish scenario, STEPS, the peak for oil demand is now seen slightly later, arriving “around 2030,” rather than before the end of this decade, as envisaged in last year’s analysis. It sees oil consumption averaging 96.9 million barrels a day in 2050, up from the previous estimate of 93.1 million barrels a day.

No matter which outlook is ultimately proven right, the world must grapple with an array of risks spanning sanctions on oil, uncertainty over Russian natural gas supplies and the risk of cyber-attacks on electricity infrastructure, Birol said.

“Global energy security faces an unprecedented range of threats in a way that we have never seen before,” he said.

8 Replies to ““The IEA’s bold assertions have had a rendezvous with reality””

  1. If you don’t faint easily look at what they (those who know) are saying about coal post 2050. Approximately 40% of the world to be powered by coal. Cannot escape this unless we give up energy.

  2. All of those were political documents, bearing no reflection of reality, written by advocates of a world population of 500 million.

    We need hydrocarbons because at the moment there is nothing that has a similar energy density that is portable.

  3. The destruction of the Free world’s economy is not going quite as the bolsheviks planned
    after their dissolution on Dec 26th 1991.

    The only reason they didn’t disappear completely was they found safe refuge
    in Ottawa, DC, London, Paris, Berlin, and Peking.

    (Ottawa being important only as a back door to DC, but flattery works on the weak minded)

  4. Remind me again about the date of Peak Oil.

    If I learnt one life lesson from the oilfield its our self anointed elites are dumber than rocks
    With all due respect to rocks.

  5. “Forecasts from the Paris-based IEA — established following the 1973 oil shock — are used globally as a benchmark by governments and energy companies for planning policy and investments…

    The report on Wednesday is another shift in tone for the agency, which in September said that billions of dollars need to be invested in new oil and gas supplies — having previously drawn fire for saying that such investment was incompatible with climate goals. Republican lawmakers have assailed the agency and sought to cut its funding.”

    If the US immediately and permanently cut off all funding to international NGOs, most importantly the UN, the effect would be felt immediately.

    Socialism/communism/fascism/disinfo/corruption would be dealt a severe blow, and armies of worse-than-useless intellectual-yet-leeches and their hangers on would have to learn to code.

Leave a Reply

Navigation