Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
Not really fearful. People have only been watching media that conforms to their worldview for decades now, and the left keeps losing.
I hope AI is better at punctuation than MM, because that’s a big part of my worldview.
Redpop has it mostly right. Exposure to “other people think differently from you” is what the AI “upgrades in service” will end.
Oh, like nothing that came before has failed to “tailor and validate your worldview”
AI is “Apparently Inconsequential”
Give me a break.
Public discourse has always been doing this very thing. AI is just the current thing. Used to be the yellow press, or the holy roman empire, or whatever.
Wakey Mr. Malice. Your insight is trite and lacks deep historical context.
Oh, and attempt to write a coherent sentence.
To wit: “…AI being implemented to tailor your newsfeed to only include information that validates your worldview, NO MATTER HOW WHAT IT IS.”
HA HA HA…shaddup
That’s called CNN.
Speaking of MM, this just “dropped” 3 hours ago. I’m a few minutes in and very good thus far:
“YOUR WELCOME” with Michael Malice #384: Tim Pool
https://youtu.be/05ubT4ivyVk?si=4Fw0ybrsGFoGru14
People don’t need AI for Confirmation Bias.
Maybe it speeds up the process or helps validate it, but its been around forever.
This is already being done, and has been for quite a while, with one exception to his prediction. He’s giving the implementors of AI way too much of the benefit of a doubt. They ARE NOT tailoring the AI you see to your preferences. They are OUTRIGHT tailoring the AI you see to THEIR preferences.
This has been going on with GOOGLE for quite some time. You’ve probably noticed the AI that pops up before the references applied to your keywords. Those AI summaries are massaged to present a leaning and it is passed off as a summary of all available sources. But, in fact, the sources used are bias in their own right. They have predetermined positions that are reinforced by this format.
They are depending upon laziness in this application. They hope you won’t ignore their “convenient” summary to your inquiry and go digging on your own. Because on those issues considered partisan, your research will most likely not reflect the summary they provide through AI.
Out of curiosity, I inquired the GOOGLE AI in the first week that it became available a rather loaded question. “Are the average IQ’s of different races distinguishable?” I wanted to see if AI was willing to be politically incorrect. Surprisingly, they stated that there were differences on average, and proceeded to provide documented percentage rates from studies to back it up. NOW, HOWEVER, if you ask that same question, you will get lectured on racism.