The co-founder of Pride in Surrey, and a major figure in UK LGBT media, was today found guilty of raping a 12-year-old boy. BBC South East Today didn’t even mention this and instead devoted several minutes to a feature about a drag queen
The co-founder of Pride in Surrey, and a major figure in UK LGBT media, was today found guilty of raping a 12-year-old boy. BBC South East Today didn’t even mention this and instead devoted several minutes to a feature about a drag queen
Gee, nobody could have seen that coming /s
Yee old, formerly known as Great, Britain is going down faster and faster.
This is where I remind you that “Conservative” Treehouse believes our public schools SHOULD teach 11yo boys how to fellate men. I suppose if that sex act (and buggaring) was actually TAUGHT to our school boys … then cases like this wouldn’t “technically” be rape. The boys would KNOW how to act.
I’d love to see the evidence for that claim.
Un Saludo
I’d happily give it to you … but I’ve been BANNED forever from “Conservative” Treehouse for speaking out AGAINST teaching our little boys the details of gay sex in public schools.
Now, I understand you are from England … where the LGBTQueer lifestyle is particularly celebrated and defended as … “normal” … so I understand the framework of your disapproval. So there’s that.
I’m an expat Canadian and definitely not living in England so you understand nothing about the framework of my disapproval.
Your reply tells you have no evidence that Sundance approves of paedophilia, only your repeated assertions that you were banned for a comment you made at the Conservative Treehouse.
BTW, here is its comments policy:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/guidelines-for-comments/
Given the details in the above it’s easy to see how one could run afoul of the guidlines.
I read something in one of your posts that suggested you were a Brit. So my mistaken interpretation.
(5) The accurate dissemination of truth; without fear or apology, because ultimately the Truth Has No Agenda.
Yeah … I had read, and followed “Sundances” guidelines for comments … posted multiple times … during my time as a commenter. I followed the tenets of (5) because the truth has no agenda.
At first the Admin. chided me for using inappropriate language for phonetically spelling a gay sex act. I apologized, and pledged to use more obliquely structured language to describe such acts. After that I wasn’t banned.
But when I questioned the Admin. if he were actually MORE upset about my decrying the public school instruction given to 11yo boys being TAUGHT how to perform gay sex acts, with diagrams and descriptions … than he was concerned about my phonetic spelling of gay sex acts … I was immediately BANNED.
I wasn’t banned for anything other than letting the Admin. know that my TRUTH had no agenda … and that I would speak without fear or apology. A truth they obviously refuse to allow on their gay-friendly … gay-defending website.
But as you say … it’s THEIR website … so they have the Freedom to ban me. Meh. And please NOTE I have been banned from The Daily Mail and You Gov for also speaking out against the constant propaganda “celebration” of the LGBTQueers. That’s what passes for FREE SPEECH? So be it. Cause we wouldn’t want to create a backlash against the “gains” made by the LGBTQueers. Oops. Too Late. You’ve already jumped the shark
Kenji, all you’ve done is muddy the waters in your attempt to continue slandering Sundance.
Playing the victim constantly is super tiresome, and dare I say, boring.
And now you accuse me of jumping the shark, whatever that means.
Slander? That’s the word you use for TRUTH?
And PS … all I ever had contact with were CTH “Admin’s.” … THEY banned me … not Sundance personally … so far as I know … unless he hides as an Admin. But I would be happy to subpoena all their internal communications… speaking of TRUTH and SLANDER.
As far as I know it’s Sundance’s blog so he is admin; those are his guidelines referred to above, of which you only focused on one of the gazillion listed.
BTW, I use the word slander for slander and I use the word truth for truth.
Despite the TRUTH that you have NO evidence that I am “slandering” Sundance. Just because you don’t like the TRUTH of what was done to me on CTH … you call it slander. Your opinion, devoid of any evidence, is not slander.
As I said … let the charges be brought … I look forward to the Discovery phase.
And FWIW … I made a rather generous donation to Sundance when his home was damaged by the hurricane. I had no axe to grind until he axed me.
Imagine that! Sexual perverts are sexually perverted?
If only there were glaringly obvious signs for normal people to see…
If they don’t put it in writing it didn’t happen.
When it does get referenced it’s only via “far right wing” outlets.
And a Liberal judge will not impose any jail time?