13 Replies to “One Flu Out Of The Wuhan Nest”

  1. L – The New York Times, once known as the “paper of record” and “The Grey Lady” due to her historic
    eminence. Now qualifies as deceased as a mummy, with updates written on her wrappings.

  3. With the release of the JFK, RFK, and MLK files, I think the CIA is just trying to get ahead of the story when it’s finally revealed that they all died from Covid.

  4. What’s even worse is that the virus was probably engineered by Fauci/Deep State operatives in a North Carolina bio weapons lab and then sent to Wuhan where it – **cough cough** – “escaped”. All to get rid of DJT in the 2020 election. Demonic.

  5. Such an amazing lack of self-reflection – journos publishing and pushing one narrative, name-calling and dismissing any other options, and then later having to agree with the very story they once denigrated.
    But with no apologies. “We were right then, and we are right now. Period.”
    Have they no shame?
    Sorry…..silly question.

  6. There’s a little more to this than what you’re seeing on the surface. Senator Cotton was invited by an editor at the NYT’s to present a guest editorial related to Cotton’s belief that the US Military should be used as a resource to settle down the Leftist rioting after the 2016 election. The big problem is that Cotton wrote a gem of a piece that was difficult to argue against. The staff at the NYT’s and their ideologue readers were livid (not at what Cotton said) that he was given a forum. It was a very persuasive piece, and the non-debating Left can’t cope with that.

    So, what happened is that the editor who actually did the right thing to massive heat from the staff at the NYT’s and their readers was punished. He (James Bennett) eventually was forced to resign.

    The piece the NYT’s printed mocking Senator Cotton’s “fringe theory” on Covid was merely a continuation of their response to his previous editorial. Otherwise he wouldn’t have been displayed to prominently in the by-line. The were less concerned about the substance of the piece, and more concerned about rationalizing they’re abhorrent treatment of Mr. Bennet for allowing a differing of opinion to be printed.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation