Commies Creep To Majority In BC

They’re being vewy, vewy caweful: Why does it take so long to count so few votes?

This is a really stupid take by Spencer Fernando.

75 Replies to “Commies Creep To Majority In BC”

    1. so both B.C. and New Brunswick voters have shown their stupidity, and they will suffer badly and it looks good on them. the only winners are the CUPE employees in N.B. enjoy your slide

  1. “NDP is doing about 20 points better on average vs. election night…”

    Of course they are. This is what happens when the fox runs the hen house. Who’s in charge of advance ballots, mail in ballots, and voting machines? The NDPee.

      1. “You have no evidence of anything.”

        Oh, but I do. The mere fact that the government is STILL counting votes is all the evidence you need to prove that the process is A) untrustworthy and B) run by profoundly incompetent fools.

        The existence of “advanced voting” alone is sufficient to call the result into question. Who secures the advance votes? The government. Who counts the advance votes? The government.

        Why is this a problem? Because THE GOVERNMENT has control over the physical boxes, the storage, the press the ballots are printed on, the records that tell what box came from where, the seals they put on the boxes, and et cetera.

        What stops them from pre-counting the votes and throwing away the ones they don’t like? Nothing.
        What stops them from switching out ALL the advance votes and putting in new ones they control? Nothing.
        What stops the clerk in charge of the storage from jiggering the records and slipping in a box or two she made up in her garage? Nothing.

        What stops them from tossing the works into an incinerator and making up any number they like? Nothing.

        And so forth. Any arrangement where scrutineers from all parties cannot see the physical boxes at all times requires that we trust the Authorities. Which is the one thing we can’t do in an election, as proven through history.

        Why do you think we have a secret ballot in the first place? Because lying liars lie, cheating cheaters cheat, and thugs beat up people who don’t vote the way the thugs like.

        1. “The mere fact that the government is STILL counting votes is all the evidence you need to prove that the process is A) untrustworthy and B) run by profoundly incompetent fools.”

          No it isn’t. It’s called ‘being careful’ and it’s probably beyond your comprehension but you’d do well to learn of it.

          “What stops them from pre-counting the votes and throwing away the ones they don’t like? Nothing.
          What stops them from switching out ALL the advance votes and putting in new ones they control? Nothing. What stops the clerk in charge of the storage from jiggering the records and slipping in a box or two she made up in her garage? Nothing.”

          Again with the know-nothing innuendo.

      2. Come on, UnReal…
        It doesn’t take more than a week to count a few thousand ballots!!!

        But then… your side always seems to try to convince us not to believe our lying eyes.
        That’s not going to work anymore.

        1. It does not matter who votes; it only matters who counts the votes. -Joseph Stalin

  2. Jagmeet The Bearded Popsicle will call his boyfriend Blackie The First to make a public statement: whoever even suggests of BC election shenanigans will be trampled with horses, bank accounts frozen + dragged through countless bogus court proceedings.

  3. So, bashing gays, bashing Muslims, whining about abortions ain’t a winning strategy, who’da thunk!

    NME666

        1. What are those other issues, UnReal?
          And the candidate you’re referring to walked back his comments, and apologized.
          …as if you’ve never said a stupid thing in your life…
          The comments in question were made in 2017, FFS!!!
          And that’s according to YOUR source that YOU provided!
          (People who live in glass houses…)

  4. Bye bye B.C.

    It’s going to be handed to the tribes.

    You won’t even be able to read the name of the town you grew up in, unless adults can get a court injunction to stop the government.

    1. Yup. BC. Stick this on your licence plates “Our past is Our future”.

      Before Columbus.

      1. Honestly that sounds like a pretty decent outcome at this point. Few things would fix up BC and all of Canada for that matter faster than several tens of millions of Indo-Chinese.

        1. ” Few things would fix up BC…”
          Implying, of course, that BC was broken in the first place.
          Just who was in power for the last 4 or 5 years in BC, UnReal?

  5. I’d be shocked if the commies didn’t “win” in this circumstance. Did anyone actually think that a recount would come out in the favour of the conservatives? Sick and sad times that this is the reality.

  6. How would Spencer Fernando know “the election is not being rigged”?
    Our elections are designed so that they are un-auditable so cheaters can win.

    1. WTF would you even audit them for? Again: the burden of proof is on you and you haven’t delivered.

      1. “WTF would you even audit them for?”

        To prove that they are not cheating (obviuously).

        “Again: the burden of proof is on you and you haven’t delivered.”

        That’s what the audits would be for: to prove (or *disprove*) any cheating.

        (not a rocket scientist, are you?)

        1. Audits only work when you are auditing *for* something ie looking for something. What are we looking for here? Invisible watermarks?

          1. Oh, I dunno… Maybe fake signatures on mail in ballots, fake addresses for thousands of voters, voters who are no longer living in the state, not to mention not living at all…
            Need I go on?

      2. “Again: the burden of proof is on you…”

        This is (unsurprisingly) incorrect. In a free country, any citizen can call BS on the election results for any reason, or indeed for no reason. It is incumbent on the government to prove they didn’t lie, not on citizens to prove they did. Citizens can’t prove that, we don’t have access to the ballots except through the scrutineers.

        There are officials -responsible- for the veracity of the results. If there is no possibility of an audit to -verify- the result, then they can’t be called to account.

        Basically, you’re backwards. Again.

        1. Nope the burden of proof is on you to substantiate this and you can’t deliver. Hmmm this seems awfully familiar.

  7. L- The big winners are the Triads(and everyone they launder money for. The prov. Attorney
    General will disallow the RCMP Organized Crime section from laying charges. Will Trudeau’s
    Regime get to protect the CCP(Triad) political influencers for yet another year. Until a Polivre
    Government pepper sprays the Trudeau Regime to the ground,(electorally speaking/pun intended) and removes the Liberal handcuffs from RCMP Security.

    I have a dream of a Freedom Convoy 2.0 celebration on Canada Day, where the RCMP Musical
    Ride officers have honorary members. Premier Brian Pickford, Tamara Lich and Chris Barber
    on horseback with an honour guard with the Commissonor behind them. Premier Pickford,
    would of course, be holding a copy of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in his hand.

    Yes, it is a dream, but I’m old enough to remember a 20th Century Canada, proud of it’s
    Heritage, pioneering spirit of our ancestors full of optimism, carved out of the wilderness
    by men and women of uncommon valour. Yes, currently, it requires a Restoration Project,
    a second National Dream to keep it from falling into the globalist abyss.

    Is it worth the effort and sacrifice our ancestors thought it was? Your thoughts?

  8. The commies never fired a shot in their Revolution … nope. They just stuffed the ballot box and slow-counted the results in their favor. A totally “peaceful transition of power” … a totally “peaceful transformation of Western government and society”

    And the dull witted leftist who vote communist will be saddened when their “Free Stuff” gets taken by the Politburo … and all they get is confiscatory taxation.

  9. // Remarkably, the NDP’s gains in late-counted votes this year are looking like they could be even *bigger* than the 2020 pandemic election, //

    Nice try.
    But there is no “fix” happening; rather a close race means close inspections
    There are several types of counts being done.
    Mail in ballots continuing today
    Automatic Judicial recounts where results are very close. [two seats, results later today]
    Special ballots [prisons, hospitals] 22,000 absentee and special votes will be counted Monday.
    Judicial recounts on request within a further week[probably if any of the close ones change a seat, which hasn’t happened yet]

  10. Why the bleep don’t mail in ballots have to be received by post office closing time on election day? The addition of fake ballots to overcome a slim lead is altogether too tempting. In 2020 Trump was leading in Pennsylvania by 700.000 votes on election day and eventually lost. He was also leading in all the swing states where the Democrats kept counting until they won them all. Half of Americans think it was horse poop.

    1. Half of Americans have horse poop for brains.

      Once again: the mail in ballots were added to the totals later all at once. You were warned about the ‘Red Mirage’ and refused to listen. Your failure to learn shouldn’t be my problem.

      1. So its easier to cheat, JD. Mail-in voting is the dream come true for election cheaters.

        1. There’s zero evidence of mail-in votes being used for mass cheating.

          “why is mail in voting allowed at all?”

          Because some people can’t be around for election day ex military, expats, people who are unwell, etc

    2. “Why the bleep don’t mail in ballots have to be received by post office closing time on election day? ”

      My question as well. If you absolutely have to allow them, restrict them to ONLY people who can prove a need for them….then give a deadline for mailing them. They can then be counted right along with all the other ballots.

      How hard would that be?

  11. No it’s not and no it’s not Kate. There is nothing wrong with any of this, you just refuse to understand how elections work. Close elections are not new. Mail in voting isn’t new or nefarious. It is not the obligation of Spencer or anyone else to indulge your wanton psychosis on this or other issues.

    1. UnReal is now pretending to be an election expert, and is man-splaining to Kate how elections work.
      How misogynistic of you, UnReal.

  12. I’ve lived in the Lower mainland all my life. Voted in every election. I don’t believe for a second that there’s fraud involved; there’s just a HUGE number of progressives living here. The fact that Rustad’s Conservatives could come out of nowhere in a year, and almost topple the NDP/Public Service machine is pretty amazing.
    That would suggest that even the average BC resident has had enough of the tax and spend ideology.
    The big ones though are the cost of housing (never mind the shortage), and the health care crisis.
    The wife of a friend is a therapist at the local hospital; she says she has FOUR bosses she has to report to…wtf?!
    (My GP retired this year and I can’t get a replacement …the clinic he worked out of won’t even let me book an appointment. I have to show up at 10:00AM, stand in line and maybe get to see a Dr., who knows nothing about my medical history.)

    1. Thank you for a voice of sanity in this thread. The entire Lower Mainland and Vancouver Island is traditional NDP territory. The Conservatives didn’t even exist 18 months ago,and the previous leader was an evangelical who never won a seat.
      The Province will survive, and we might have to endure another four years of UNDRIP, by which time the Indians should be fabulously rich and they will boot the Dippers out unless they allow all FN approved resource projects.
      Good luck to Rustad in Opposition. In a short time he did a hell of a lot better than local hero Max Bernier.

      Nova Scotia is about to go to an early election on November 26th, so with Saskabush voting soon and the Donald Hitler/ Stalin Harris contest down south, elections are far more exciting than NHL hockey right now.

      1. “In a short time he did a hell of a lot better than local hero Max Bernier.”

        Damn good point. Also want to point out that he’s coming real close in Juan De Fuca and I always thought that elections there would amount to a horse race between NDP and Green.

      2. “Good luck to Rustad in Opposition. In a short time he did a hell of a lot better than local hero Max Bernier.”

        Yep. the party which got more votes than Green federally, without gaining a seat, is responsible for the malaise of BC provincial politics. Got it.
        Svend is a synonym for NDP.

  13. People just aren’t very good at counting these days. Start paying cash at the checkout and you’ll understand why hand counts take so long.

    And the electorate is moving left. We’ve let commies teach kids for 2 generations or more. What did we think would happen?

    Couple of central planks in Marx’s lead up plan were progressive income taxes and public education. How many of us grew up thinking these are perfectly normal and acceptable? Yeah.

    Sorry for going way off on a tangent. Ha.

    1. “And the electorate is moving left.”

      There was data for that in the 2000s not so much today at least in Canada. The CPC has its strongest support in young people. The Dave Barret NDP was way more left-wing than any BC NDP administration since.

      1. I personally knew Dave Barrett’s Minister of Labour and there is no way the Barrett government is even close to being as left wing as today’s gang. Folks would be rolling in their graves at that suggestion. They were left for the day, but they had common sense.

        1. The Barret administration approved the ALR and created the ICBC just for a start. That alone is far more outrageously leftist than any other single policy approved by Deby, ‘common sense’ or not.

          1. UnMe – just to be clear when the Barrett NDP swept to power they ran on the platform of creating the ALR and ICBC. This wasn’t a post election fever dream, since they clearly ran on their campaign on the 1970’s fear of Canada running out of food, and greedy insurance companies killing motorists with crazy premiums. They won, and for better or worse, they delivered. So, unlike our present governments both federal and provincial they don’t just spring things on the electorate.

            For example I don’t recall the federal Liberals telling us they would increase immigration to the present levels, nor can I recall the BC NDP telling us that they truly dreamed of making BC legally native land. Maybe I missed these election planks.

  14. Well, BC is our Calafornication,so why would we expect any other behaviour?
    The concept,that public services must not only be free of conflict of interest,they also must be seen to be free of such conflicts,is long dead.
    I think we buried such ethical expectations at the funeral for Common Sense.
    Elections Canada looks corrupt to me.
    However they need not be,for the kind of elections results we see.
    As long as those who benefit from this Kleptocracy are allowed to vote,then the stealing and destruction will continue, as apparently approved by the popular vote.
    That politicians and government employees cannot admit their conflict of interest,they will vote for their own self enrichment.
    This is Can Ahh Duh’s idea of “Good Government”,where those who contribute to our overall wealth and welfare,will always be outvoted by those who live off of the work of the tax payer.
    The parasitic overload are not Tax Payers,they are “Tax Churners”,somehow oblivious to where the wealth they consume and destroy comes from.
    Natural NOT SEEs.

  15. UPDATE: 1:30 p.m
    With Sunday’s 1 p.m. update, Kelowna Centre’s BC Conservative candidate Kristina Lowen maintains her 72 vote lead over the BC NDP’s Loyal Wooldridge. There remains 228 absentee ballots left to count in the riding, which will take place Monday.

    The closest riding in the province continues to be Surrey-Guilford, where the BC Conservative candidate Honveer Singh Randhawa holds a 12 vote lead over BC NDP candidate Garry Begg. There remains 226 absentee ballots left to count in that riding.

    https://electionsbcenr.blob.core.windows.net/electionsbcenr/Results_7097_GE-2024-10-19_Party.html

    1. “There remains 228 absentee ballots left to count in the riding, which will take place Monday.”

      They can’t count 228 votes before Monday? You report that datum as if it is a sensible thing, said by a sensible human being?

      Obvious shenanigans.

      1. I think that absentee ballots can be received for some days after the election.
        //
        Ballots counted at final count include:
        ƒ vote-by-mail packages received by mail after the close of advance voting,
        ƒ vote-by-mail packages dropped off at a designated drop-off location,
        ƒ ballots cast by out-of-district voters at partial-tech1
        or non-tech2 voting places, and
        ƒ ballots cast by in-district voters at a non-tech voting place to which they were not
        assigned.
        Ballots counted at final count are placed in certification envelopes during voting. Certification
        envelopes include information about the voter who cast the ballot, which helps election
        officials ensure the voter was eligible and only voted once.
        To prepare for final count, election officials at district electoral offices and headquarters
        assess certification envelopes to ensure they are completed in accordance with legislation.
        Ballots are then separated from certification envelopes before being counted in a way that
        preserves the secrecy of the vote.
        The final results of an election are determined at final count based on the votes accepted
        at initial count and final count. At the end of final count, a candidate is officially declared
        elected.
        https://electionsbcenr.blob.core.windows.net/electionsbcenr/counting-processes.pdf

        1. Thanks, Dizzy, for the process explanation. Personally, I’d rather see it done under careful scrutiny than done in a big hurry. Nothing major (bad) is going to happen if they take a few extra days.
          This way, if someone wins by a handful of votes, the result will at least be seen as legitimate.

      2. Phantom: Maybe because they are still printing the 228 ballots. Shenanigans take time and deniable falsification.

        1. It does take time to print out 228 new ballots. Particularly when the one doing it is some unionized public employee working on a PC still running Windows 95.

  16. The real lesson from this election is that if anyone starts to tell you that your vote won’t matter you should shut them up before they finish.

  17. This was expected IMO… when you cant count the votes on election day and it takes a week or more to “count” the votes, than you know they cheated.
    The cheaters won… it took a week to find the votes they needed, but they won.
    No surprise at all.

Navigation