Tucker With “The High Priest Of Establishment Journalism”

Two hours with Mark Halperin, and it’s good, so grab a beverage or two.

Mark Halperin has better political sources than anyone in media. He now believes Donald Trump is likely to win. If that happens, Halperin predicts the psychological collapse of the Democratic Party — “greatest mental health crisis in the history of the country.”

What price would you pay to serve your country? Would you sacrifice your career? Your reputation? Even your own freedom? Those who served in Donald Trump’s first administration were forced to face these questions in a very real way. Many paid a terrible price. It’s time to tell their stories.

23 Replies to “Tucker With “The High Priest Of Establishment Journalism””

  1. “greatest mental health crisis in the history of the country.”

    As I said over at Blazing Cat Fur, I believe this is probably right. They’re already borderline, most of them. They will go completely full-retard crazy, and start looking for Salvation at the bottom of a bottle of chardonnay.

    And I have a big bowl popcorn all ready.

    1. I hope they all move to Canada as previously threatened. Don’t worry … you’re already 75% leftist majority in Canada … you’ll hardly notice this influx of more leftist mental patients. However these unhinged Americans tend to be old and white … so you might notice that.

      1. We are ready. The RCMP can carry their bags and then we can offer them MAID service

    2. Maybe they can all commit Revolutionary Suicide a la Jonestown. Even better if they made it a pay-per-view!

    3. It already happened in 2016 when Trump won. The Dems haven’t lost their mental illness since then. Halprin is fairly naive. And not without his own biases. On the whole, I wasn’t impressed.

    1. They will roll over if Trump hits them really, really hard, like prison time and confiscation of ill-gotten gains. A decade or two behind bars would certainly draw the attention of the guilty.

      1. He had an opportunity to do exactly this in his first term, but never did so. He even explicitly gave Hillary a free pass. What might lead you to believe the next four years will result in something different?

        1. “He had an opportunity to do exactly this in his first term, but never did so. He even explicitly gave Hillary a free pass. What might lead you to believe the next four years will result in something different?”

          Because Donald Trump was naive in his first term, and really didn’t understand DC at all. He listened to and took advice from some so-called Republicans whom he thought were on his side, but who were really out to do nothing but impede and sabotage him at every turn. He knows better now.

          1. That’s my hope anyway. My question is … what will Peter Strozk’s “insurance policy” be in 2024? What kind of political administrative shackles will they put on Trump this time around?

            Only this time … they know how to make their emails and text messages … disappear.

      2. In Trump’s first term, he had the second term to think about. This time around, he can never run for President again. If he wins, what’s to stop him from taking a vacation on this and many similar issues? He can’t be punished with an election loss after all.

        1. Then again … Obama couldn’t run again either … so he found an empty vessel to carry his third term. Speaking of empty vessels … is Mike Pence interested in the Presidency?

  2. I can’t believe the State Dept will allow a Trump win, as a wiser man than I said “There are trillions at stake”.

  3. according to General Flynn there are at least a million chinese military inside the U.S. waiting for orders…….
    the entire U.S. military is only a million ….. never mind the 20 million illegal migrants, when does the trigger get pulled?

    1. Alf for the win on the scariest thought of the day.
      However, don’t forget all those armed “Muricans” waiting for the excuse to go all in.

  4. I’m going to enjoy watching you clowns whine and complain that the vote was rigged when Trump is destroyed.

    1. You assume the same fraudulant processes as the last election? You may be correct, we shall see.

Navigation