Safe and Effective®

Calling for governments to enact a “global moratorium” on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could have been a death sentence for a scientist’s career not long ago. Now it opens the door to a prestigious science publisher.

The Springer Nature medical journal Cureus, sibling to Nature and Scientific American, published a peer-reviewed paper by high-profile mRNA vaccine critics last month, showing the growing mainstream openness to data and arguments once nitpicked if not ignored by publishers and suppressed by academia and Big Tech.

The feds have struggled to keep interest high in each new formulation of the COVID vaccines, with fewer than 12% of minors, 22% of adults and just 41% of those 65 and up taking the 2023-2024 vaccines, according to the latest weekly National Immunization Survey.

The dam of The Science, which once limited the flow of research questioning the integrity of trial data and wisdom of one-size-fits-all vaccination recommendations to a trickle, now struggles to stop a worldwide deluge as new cracks emerge seemingly every week.

While early reports from the mRNA trials said the novel vaccines “could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms,” re-analysis of Pfizer’s trial data “identified statistically significant increases” in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the intervention group, which then became unmistakable after emergency use authorization, the Cureus paper says.

“The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted,” the paper also states.

U.S. approval of mRNA vaccines “on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits,” the authors wrote.

They include multiple cancelation targets: cardiologist Peter McCullough, MIT senior research scientist Stephanie Seneff, vaccine researcher Jessica Rose, and tech entrepreneur and Vaccine Safety Research Foundation founder Steve Kirsch, a philanthropist once courted by Democratic presidential hopefuls.

The feds were so concerned about one of those SAEs, heart inflammation, that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention drafted an alert about a surprisingly high number of post-vaccination myocarditis reports to send to its Health Alert Network.

54 Replies to “Safe and Effective®”

  1. “serious adverse events (SAEs) in the intervention group, which then became unmistakable after emergency use authorization, “.
    Except to Canada Health Officialdom.
    0-21 days,depending on province,where the obvious side effects were..
    “Amongst the Unvaccinated..”

    According to our dear Leaders.

    I have argued all along..Incompetence or malice?
    It does not matter.
    These Ignorant Arrogant Minions did their thing.
    Either they KNEW or they should have KNOWN..For they proclaimed themselves the EXPERTS..
    And we must reward them proportionately..such that none will dare such help for generations.
    By their actions you shall know them.
    Murder?
    Manslaughter?
    Hang them all.
    For they demonstrated themselves to be the Nasties,Thugs and Fools..
    Who will never stop harming and lying.
    Regardless of “The Science”.

    1. Absolutely. They have NO excuses. Many experts tried to warn them. many doctors and scientists spoke out and lost everything. And the media is also culpable for participating in the silencing of dissent and stoking fear.

    1. The fear is strong with them, and they grew up at time when people, foolishly or not trusted government and the media. Covid taught me to trust neither, and I never will.

    2. As my older sister says, I’ll take anything if the doctor says it will make me live longer. Currently on about 25 different prescriptions. To say she loves big pharma is an understatement. Even a nurse practitioner told her she’s on some drugs to counteract the side effects of other drugs.

      1. Yep my baby sister is the same way, she’s had at least seven jabba jabbas and tried to get my elderly mother to get more than two jabbas-talked Mom out of the boosters.

        1. You’re not alone Rose…have an older brother, super educated to the yin yang, however I think he skipped “Skepticism 101”
          I asked him last year at what point will you say enough is enough?
          Answer: “Whenever they tell me to stop.”
          *Sigh*

  2. My anger does not lesson it only grows stronger, what they did to us is being scrubbed on the internet allegedly google will no longer store information in it’s memory-why- oh we know why. My Conservative provincial government made it a crime to leave your zip code, yes we could only travel in our postal code-my brother was in hospice dying of brain cancer and I wasn’t allowed to go see him. The cruelty and insanity of all levels of government needs to be dealt with in our civil and criminal courts. I have not forgotten what you did to us liberals/Cons and my anger will never recede.

    1. The cruelty we were subjected to by self righteous morons is beyond calculating. Prison time would start to make up for it.

  3. Can you imagine the fallout if the covid injections are found to be harmful? Civil litigation and possibly criminal charges for rights violations against the coerced vaccinated and the unvaccinated. Then there’s the personal embarrassment for the political class, medical/public health authorities, media and journalists, higher education administrators, celebrities, etc. who publicly insulted and attacked the unvaccinated and pushed for implementation of appalling policies of segregation and discrimination.

    1. What do you mean “if they are found to be harmful.” They clearly are harmful, but it goes unacknowledged by the perpetrators.

      1. Well, I’m unvaccinated because I think the injections are not safe so I have an obvious bias. I have to allow for the possibilty that I am wrong.

    2. They ARE harmful. And the warning red flags have been flying from the very beginning. Our governments, media, law enforcement and health care system all cooperated together to kill us. There are two questions to be answered. 1) Was it on purpose to reduce the population? 2) Just how bad is it going to get for the vaxxed?

  4. It should have been obvious from the start that you do not give an experimental vaccine to the whole world. Just crazy. Any thinking person saw through this at an early point.

    1. .
      Me and most of my family and friends .. saw this from the jump and refused (at great social cost) to take an unknown, thrown together, untested concoction for a quite survivable flu.

      The evil media hype was bound to corral everyone who is fearful by nature. I learned that most Canadians are indeed, fearful, mindless cowards. And someone ‘splain to me the vile hatred everyone had for we smarter, braver, unvaxxed.

      We were treated like shit by our own society for not being an ovine stooge.

      We do, now, gloat a bit when we hear the latest stats how many people inexplicably dropped dead almost certainly due to the mRNA poison.

      Canada is now nothing but a collectivist shit-hole. I really hate to say that, but it’s true.

      .

  5. Posted this earlier under the Wednesday topic but it would be better received here.

    https://www.wnd.com/2024/02/global-moratorium-covid-shots-mainstream-science-considering-halt/

    So now there is going to be a moritorium on the effects of the injections! Some of us here have been demanding that since the very beginning. Now they are considering closing the barn door after the barn has burned down! There aren’t enough HONEST lawyers or IMPARTIAL judges to try the cases that should be brought before volunteer jurors. There will be no shortage of jurors when/if the biggest crime against humanity is brought in the International Criminal Court. The genocidal charges being brought against Israel are as a grain of sand on a beach compared to the intentional massive murder that has/is been/being committed. As a pureblood I want to volunteer for the first jury post when the trial gets underway, I’ll even pay my own expences and costs to ensure that justice is done.

    Reply

    1. I like this part “main stream science” like it was science that failed. It was NOT science. The criminals who administered these shots were NOT scientists. The real scientists, the mainstream ones, were silenced.

    1. I find it curious that they are mostly male. THIS, I think requires a vigorous evaluation of the “vaccine” development and “contents.” As far back as 2017, it was noticed that mRNA’s were expressed differently between males and females. Androgen and Estrogen. Males and females aren’t the same….who knew?

  6. My wife was in the ICU at our local hospital with a non-covid ailment, Feb. 2020. My family and I were not allowed in to see her for 4 months because of the covid BS. When we were allowed to see her I asked the attending nurse why their was a large sheet of plastic blocking the hallway, I was told this was the start of the covid wing of the ICU. The lights were low and NO ONE was in that unit. My wife passed away 2 weeks after we finally got in to see her. My trust and respect for the medical profession, Doctors, government and law inforcement are now Non Existing a pox on them all. Steve O

    1. Steve O
      Sorry about your wife.
      Recently, I was in for doctors visit, I told the fools I wouldn’t wear a stupid useless mask, so I was corralled out of general waiting area, to an exam room. At the end of my visit, the doctor asked me about getting the regular flue shot, and booster. When I declined, he seamed upset. So I checked with a friend , who used to manage 2 health clinics, and yup, Dr’s are bribed by big pharma.

  7. And CRICKETS from the 2 Vax Pushing TROLLS that infest SDA, the faux conservatives that chirp leftist talking points consistently, but insist they are “conservative”.
    The Dead Rat, and the worlds smartest trucker that has an incredible amount of time to text and post away his lefty talking points.

    1. Yes, where is Killer Marmot? He’s the big defender of the vaccine. Haven’t seen him shilling for Big Pharma in a few days.

    1. Don’t tell Health Canada. They are still blocking Ivermectin at the border. I have contacted my M P, and also the Conservative health critic to find out why. No response. Someone needs to start pressuring Heath Canada on this pointless restriction which is hurting Canadians.

      1. Well there’s always horse paste or the liquid horse stuff. I hear from our local vet there has been some major worm infestations among local horses. The stuff is just flying off the shelves as fast as he can order it in. Apparently the paste is quite palatable daubed on a mint chocolate cookie, the horses tell him.

      2. I found two options to get it in Canada.
        Pill form – Jase Case – expensive
        liquid form – sharneyhorses.net – cheap

      3. Complaining to your government representative is like shouting at your toilet.
        They don’t give a shit about us and never did.

        Everyone knows that politicians are professional liars and most are narcissistic psychopaths. Yet … so many continue to believe in them. It’s a mental disorder.

  8. High five, chest bump for 100 million dead.. It’s too bad this TRAGEDY didn’t happen on the tail end of a war.. Because then we could HANG all the bastards and still feel good about ourselves..

    Until then I’m just guarding my gate.. I’m sure everything will be fine?.. >> idiots..

  9. A paper authored by Peter McCullough? Well of course.

    McCullough is a leading opponent of mRNA vaccines, and seems to get his name on every alarmist paper on it. He’s also Chief Scientific Officer of The Wellness Company, a modern snake-oil dispensory that sells unproven remedies for anything that ails you.

    1. So that will be the official line?
      Blame the messenger.
      “Nothing to see here,just the ravings of a lunatic. move along.”
      But it was “Peer Reviewed” and you have repeatedly defended to utility of “Peer Review”..
      Now it does not serve your narrative, peer review not important?

      1. McCullough may once have been a respected cardiologist, but he’s aged into a full-blown crank. He has now been caught in dozens of preposterous and scientifically unsupported claims about COVID. I wouldn’t trust his pronouncements one whit.

        And yes, the honesty of the authors does matter in a scientific paper, particularly one which is primarily an opinion piece.

      2. But it was “Peer Reviewed” and you have repeatedly defended to utility of “Peer Review”.

        I have defended peer review as being better than no peer review, but I have also stressed its limitations. Much of the criticism of it is based on misunderstanding what it is and what it’s supposed to achieve. One thing it CAN’T do is ensure absolute correctness.

        Here the paper was basically an opinion piece. Publishing it does not necessarily mean the editors agreed with it.

        1. Either nobody paid any attention to you, in which case nobody died because of you, or they listened to you and their death is on your hands. But you’re still an imbecile.

          1. You’re like pretty much like every anti-vaxxer I’ve ever argued against.

            Really strong opinions but no solid evidence for those opinions. Just an enormous trust in the infallibility of their instincts.

          2. You seem to think vast multitudes (or something) died due to the COVID vaccines.

            There’s simply no solid evidence for that.

        1. So what have you offered here?
          Apart from slandering Dr Peter McCullough?
          This,”He has now been caught in dozens of preposterous and scientifically unsupported claims about COVID.”
          So you say.
          Yet who might you be?
          Other than a relentless defender of the status quo on this site..?
          Yet far too much of what we have seen revealed as true,3 years ago was “preposterous and scientifically unsupported”.

          1. What have I brought? I’ve cited dozens and dozens of scientific papers in this forum over the last few years supporting my arguments, and seen virtually no evidence in rebuttal.

            In regards to “Dr Peter McCullough”, even a cursory examination of his actions show him to be a self-serving quack. I didn’t slander him — he slandered himself.

            https://healthfeedback.org/authors/peter-mccullough/

          2. Other than a relentless defender of the status quo on this site..?

            Apparently there are some who think the truth of an opinion is determined by whether its held by the “status quo” or by apostates.

            I recommend you look at the evidence, and bugger who believes what. Apostates are wrong with considerable regularity.

          3. Mugs: Note a few things…

            1. There’s no controlled scientific study here. It’s purely anecdotal.
            2. Campbell doesn’t speculate what causes this. BIzarrely, though, he then call for a moratorium (but of what?)

            This is the type of sloppy dog whistling that is making Campbell a rich man.

  10. You don’t think I’ve weighed that possibility?
    I have followed him since the pandemic started when he was recommending the Vax.
    And apologized to people after realizing something seemed not on the up and up.
    He doesn’t seem the type to sell his soul.
    Maybe I’m wrong but he certainly seems passionate in asking what’s going on, and if he’s right the type of clots aren’t in any text books. What’s causing it? And the clots aren’t exactly old news.
    And if it comes down to money I ask you who gained the most from this whole debacle, and at what true expense to the public and society as a whole?
    We aren’t cattle, and I’m still pissed beyond belief over what they did to the kids.

    1. Campbell has totally sold his soul.

      As an example, he keeps going on about excess deaths, with the strong (but often unstated) implication that they’re caused by COVID vaccines.

      But the statistics Campbell uses employs dubious methods for estimating the expected number of deaths. In particular, the methods do no compensate for a growing and aging population. When you correct for those things, the number of excess deaths over the last 8 months in the UK, Canada, and Australia fall to statistically insignificant.

      Campbell is almost certainly aware of these issues, but he never addresses them. That makes him dishonest. His fans, of course, aren’t even aware of this controversy. They don’t seem to bother getting the other side of the story, which makes them highly vulnerable to manipulation.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhZf0of-gwE

      1. Great link there Killer.
        Did you watch it yourself?
        The comments are priceless.
        Again thank you for this link,provided a great bedtime laugh.
        Apart from “shoot the messenger” do you offer anything to this discussion?

        1. Yes I did watch it. Campbell has an army of minions (3 million YouTube subcribers) who come running to his defense everytime someone points out problems with his arguments, so no surprize there.

          But it’s not “shooting the messenger” to point out that someone has a history of sloppiness and even outright dishonesty, as is the case with both Campbell and McCullough. Given that most people do not have the resources (or, it seems, willingness) to thoroughly check their claims, their credibility is critical.

Navigation