If Women Ran The World

Via Instapundit;

The feminization of higher ed — and of American society as a whole — is a large topic. Here I want simply to note that the repellent jelly of moral confusion that united all three responses was saturated by that feminization. None of those women could give a direct answer to a direct question about a matter of grave moral moment. Instead, they temporized, equivocated, dodged and parried.

More: Claudine Gay first came to my attention about a month ago, when she emerged as the central figure in the Ryan Enos data fabrication scandal, as documented in these 3 articles…

Harvard is holding a board meeting today.

Update:

@realchrisrufo EXCLUSIVE: @RealChrisBrunet and I have obtained documentation demonstrating that Harvard President Claudine Gay plagiarized multiple sections of her Ph.D. thesis, violating Harvard’s policies on academic integrity.

Yes, it would appear so.

63 Replies to “If Women Ran The World”

  1. “…children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.” — Isaiah 3:12

    There you ago, then.

    1. I prefer the NLT version…..more directly to the point……

      “Childish leaders oppress my people, and women rule over them. O my people, your leaders mislead you; they send you down the wrong road.”

  2. Running a nation requires a different skill set than running a home.. Women are biologically hard wired to jump ship if required to procreate.. Treasonous hard logic baked in so the species can move forward.. Not exactly loyal when it comes to the male mind..

    Of course Im generalising, speaking of collective traits.. But as more and more women move into leadership roles.. The question isn’t can the patriarchy survive but can we survive..

    Women still do and get 1/3rd of the time and dime for the same crime a man would commit.. I have a great idea, lets get them to run everything.. We are doomed you know..

  3. About the stupid misogynist take I’d expect from IP. ‘Feminization’ (ie women being outside the kitchen) is neither here nor there. This is about evil ideas that have been working their way through universities/colleges for many decades without competent opposition. The conservative, being incapable of grasping ideas and otherwise stupid, casts about for a scapegoat.

    1. Don’t you think it odd that no one uses (or perhaps knows of) the term Misandrist? Because a base fundamental tenant of radical “feminization” is, unfortunately, Misandry. Just saying. 😀

    2. unDORK
      Go to one of those NODICK (nordic) countries, and see what the real problem is, besides your abject stupidity.

    3. Yes … all these womyn were chosen for their unparalleled intellect and leadership skill … right? And they all just happen to be female? No DEI quota filling involved at all … right?

      Well, they’ve all met their Peter Principle … when they hired PR firms to advise them on how to answer the questions from Congress. They were all incapable of original thought or consistent application of their own college rules of student conduct … so they read the PR script. Oops! WRONG Answer. You LOSE.

    4. The conservative, being incapable of grasping ideas and otherwise stupid, casts about for a scapegoat.
      ___________________________

      Hey dummy. The party you support can’t even tell what a women is or what bathroom to use.

    5. Here’s an idea.
      Why not teach both sexes ( sorry all of them) early on about consequence.
      Instead of concentrating on one gender and one way of thinking.
      There…. I’m sure the legend you are in your own “tolerant” mind won’t get what I simply propose.

  4. The reporting of this stuff is bizarre.

    https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2023/12/10/u-penns-president-board-chair-resign-after-antisemitism-testimony-backlash/

    Such as…

    A popular chant at pro-Palestinian rallies at Penn and other universities has been falsely misrepresented in recent months as a call for “Jewish genocide.”

    Experts and advocates say the chant, “Israel, we charge you with genocide,” is a typical refrain heard at pro-Palestinian rallies. Jewish and Palestinian supporters both acknowledge protesters aren’t saying “We want Jewish genocide.”

    Supporters might not be explicitly calling for Jewish genocide in that chant, but they are accusing Jews of genocide, which is the first step toward Jewish genocide (revenge for genocide). Not sure why a Boston blog/paper would even comment on that.

    1. Perhaps we should just invoke the Dan Rather rule on that one:

      “Fake but accurate”

      Their rules…oh well.

  5. It wasn’t the Jews who brought evil into the world.

    It was a woman who didn’t know when she was well off.

    1. Ohhhhhhhhh mommmmaaaaaaaa … not that patriarchal text again (sic). When men write stories … womyn get battered … the words are violence against womyn (sic) … /sarc.

  6. Its difficult to write a comment without seeming like a misogynist, but oh well.
    Many influential women seem to think we should all love and trust each other.
    “Be nice” you’d here during the scamdemic while Public Health leading women quarantined millions of people in their wretched tenements. You did it because you care about their health & safety, right you stupid bitch?
    They’re the ones who say, “Thankyou so much!” when someone at Starbucks hands them their pussified/faggoty coffee. They didn’t fix your tampon-clogged toilet, you paid them to get you an over-priced drink and a gluten-free shitty muffin.
    I see them wearing white hardhats on construction sites where they get their own bathroom but want to be treated “equally” but don’t use the C word or fart in front of them.
    I rarely see them up or down in the dirty, dangerous places, working at heights, in confined spaces and making sure the shit everyone needs like bridges and power dams get built and maintained.
    It gets worse every year.
    Its societal suicide to let weak women and nutless men make any decisions or even listen to them voice a f**king opinion.
    Siding with Palestinians and Hamas is all of that in a nutshell.

      1. Is advocating the annihilation of the Jewish people “decent manners and well-adjusted behaviour?”

        Because I have decent manners, I’ll excuse you my opinion on where you ought to take your hypocrisy.

      2. Decent manners doesn’t keep the lights on, products on shelves or the barbarians from entering the jade gate, pencil-neck.
        Offering up your bleached arsehole won’t save the women from rape or the children from dismemberment.
        Seek reality.

          1. Er, if your bleached arsehole really were covered, you wouldn’t be attracting this kind of attention, now would you? Maybe stop worrying about anti-social tendencies and grab some pants?

  7. Since when did womanhood in general prefer pajama boys? I don’t believe this university centric nanny notion.

    1. They don’t. They never have.

      They heard reports of Jewish girls being savagely raped on October 7 and thought it had to be lies, because none of THEM had ever gotten a proper seeing-to from a gang of gorgeous Arab studs.

      They support open borders because they want a supply of fresh dark meat to cheat on their husbands with. That’s it. No genuine empathy whatsoever.

  8. unme said “The conservative, being incapable of grasping ideas and otherwise stupid, casts about for a scapegoat.”

    Then said “We get it: decent manners and well-adjusted behavior set you off. Seek therapy.”

    You do not represent conservatives or well adjusted behavior.

    You do represent a baseline for the sagacious onager.

    1. Ha had to look up both words – Asian version of a wise ass – I will have to use that sometime

  9. Remember at the time the Project Vertias material on Planned Parenthood was distributed, the media focused on the legality of selling baby parts. That was the deflection.
    The other side of it is, that for decades we have been told that women in power would be more selfless and nobler, more altruistic and fair, more inclusive, more compassionate and empathetic, more honest, less given to violence, and waaaiitt for it, defenders of the defenseless,…….. Project Veritas provided an alternate image of women, in power, being just as self serving, greedy, sneaky, exploitive, vile, and soul less as any gangbanger, robber baron, thug or racketeer.

    1. And far, far more obsessed with sex than their menfolk. And then they have the gall to call US pigs and dogs and apes.

      There’s a reason the Torah prescribes death for adulteresses. Nothing short of that has ever been an effective deterrent.

  10. A little off topic here but bare with me. It strikes me as extremely funny that the three university heads that testified last week are being defended by the left and criticised by the right, and that somehow gender becomes a big part of the discussion. Gender has little or nothing to do with this, this is basically a right or wrong issue that has become political. It has become political because the politicians and bureaucrats, have all in the last half century become enamoured with the robes of power. That power hinges on an illiterate, ignorant electorate that can be easily led. It has taken fifty years to infiltrate the halls of academia with Marxist theology, fifty years to control the media, fifty years to dumb down the general populace. Fifty years to institute a doctrine that Hitler and Stalin tried to, but couldn’t, accomplish in ten. Make no mistake these three academics could not answer Stefanic, not because they were women, but because had they answered truthfully they would have upset the greater portion of the up and coming voter base that the politicians and bureaucrats have created and depend upon to retain power. Look no further than what has transpired in the last ten years, Brexit, Trump, Moleni and now Milei and Wilders, all indications that the populace are beginning to reject the path chosen by lifelong bureaucrats and politicians. Look at what has transpired in the last week or two with Suella Braverman in the UK, another politician calling for border enforcement, reduced legal immigration, less taxes, and look at how the bureaucrats and politicians are reacting. Make no mistake the Marxists in our midst have come out of the closet too soon and are furious at themselves for that mistake, as a result they will endeavour to destroy everything rather than give up power.

    1. It’s not a coincidence that all three Presidents that were testifying were women. They were sought out and promoted to their positions by search committees; THEY’RE the ones that had the search parameters.
      As to women and ruthlessness, look no further than the recently removed PM of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern.

      1. Yeah but one university was WAY ahead. Their rep was both a woman, and black. And looked like a total… well, you know. She sure didn’t get the job for her looks either. Way more intersectional.

    2. I get what you’re saying, and if the scenario was on the right (and not the left) you’d be 100% correct. But, the right and left don’t just differ in message. They differ in structure. The right is, essentially, a different purity of chocolate (dark, milk, 70%). The structure only differs in shades.

      The left, however, is a conglomerate of all different kinds of foods. You have your socialists, your LBQ alphabet crowd, your ANTIFA and BLM crews. You have immigrants (which is where it really gets interesting) which are made up groups diametrically opposed to each other (gays v. Muslims). You have your feminists. You have your self-proclaimed feminists who have no idea what that means. You have your transgenders. And, on and on and on.

      The amazing thing is that while these groups could be diametrically opposed to one another….they, also, are in competition for most favored status. When a Muslim saunters in and shoots up a gay bar, the quandary is to determine which group gets to wear the label of victim.

      Each of these groups has a single focused issue that is important beyond any other group’s. So, you end up with a housewife in Fresno exclaiming that men can get pregnant (even though she knows it’s an impossibility) because in order to push her own singular cause, she has to play ball and support every other outlandish cause equally so as to propagate the power to her political party.

      So when you say that feminism doesn’t play into the issue at hand, I’d have to disagree. Every cause, belief and rationalization of the left plays into each issue. It’s a byproduct of identity politics.

      1. They are all appendages of a body, the fingers of a fist. All working, some appearing diametrically opposed to each other, as part of a greater whole which is the destruction of every norm and standard of western civilization. It’s globalist Marxism.

  11. Men build.
    Women destroy.
    There’s a reason Kali, the Hindu goddess of death and destruction, is female.

  12. I don’t know whether blaming this on women is correct.

    Machiavelli wrote about the same problem, it’s not a new one. He called them ‘foxes’, it’s basically the managerial, intellectual class that takes over the civilisation that the ‘lions’ create. (and eventually destroy it)

    It happens with everything, look at the woke taking over Disney and ruining it for example. If you build it, they will come…. and turn it to shit.

    1. Antenor (above) nailed it, while also elevating the commentary in this thread.
      It is not about women. It is about woke idealogues deploying their Marxist shite and WEF agenda, etc.
      By the way, men invented those anti human ideologies (Marx, Foucault, Hitler, et al.). And, like these 3 women, many men deploy the same shite, and worse. Think about some of the “men” in positions of power today: Trudeau, Biden, Sunak, Macron, etc. They are as evil as the 3 women presidents.
      In short, get over the cheap, misogynistic excuses. Don’t any of you respect your mother, wife, sister, daughter?
      How about the many conservative women? Thatcher, for example.
      Misogyny and misandry clashes are just one more way to divide us.

  13. I love that this has finally, finally come home to roost on these ivory tower liars. You see them perpetrate lie after lie after lie, things that are absolutely unsupportable, and they always skate. Every single time, they waltz off with a new job and a bag full of money, laughing. They even skated on Covid lockdowns.

    But not this time.

    This time, they have gone too far. This time they are once again proposing the final solution from 1936, the Nazi plague.

    We’re not having it.

    1. I hope you’re right, Phantom, I do.

      But any real accountability in North America will have to wait for the return of Donald Trump to the White House.

      Accountability will come both to the Arabs of Israel and their European allies much sooner than that.

      By Purim 2024 I expect the Arabs to have been driven from Gaza and the “Ukrainian” Nazis to have been driven from Kiev, with Zelensky and his Little Russian whore hanged on the gallows the world had prepared for Putin.

      And Purim 2025 will be even more joyous still. It’s then that the genteel Jew-haters will begin in earnest to beg the ground to swallow them and the mountains to cover them.

        1. It really is rich to see you stick up for this woman who is defending Jew hating Nazis, is a heinous liar and a plagiarist, and who is destroying the name of Harvard faster than they are destroying it themselves.

          She is literally doing everything you constantly accuse Conservatives of, but by calling her on her numerous crimes -we- are now magically the bad guys. The pretzel logic is amazing.

      1. Trump, should he win, will not be the one who fixes all this crap. It couldn’t hurt, but it isn’t sufficient.

        The collective outrage of decent men and women against liars like Dr. Gay is what’s going to get the job done.

        Bud Lite is the model. That is what’s going to get it done. Mass abandonment and ruination for the Woke Nazis. Shunning, basically.

  14. Around that subject –

    “First, allegedly UPenn President Liz Magill “resigned.”

    Well, she resigned as President. But she did not leave; the announcement says she is still a professor and still will be filling her student’s heads with DEI, CRT and similar related crap.”

    More at https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=250275

    Salty in places

    1. I really wanted the Seantor to ask these beeotches what possible context would make it acceptable to call for genocide against Israel, particularly at a time when HamAss is doing the very best it can to actually perform a real genocide against Israel.

      But, she did a great job. And yes, they SMIRKED, those appalling morons. I watched the whole thing. They really need to be fired.

  15. I am a Harvard grad – 1980

    I wrote to them on their website today that they should fire Frau Gay as she is a Nazi. I enjoyed doing that. I have not donated to them since 1982. The place makes me sick.

  16. In the article’s picture of her, except for the photographer, all are white or Asian, and mostly female, I think I counted 3 males in the crowd…

    Interesting.

  17. One of the people who have had their work stolen by Claudine Gay is Dr. Carol Swain, who is a regular on The War Room with Steven K. Bannon.
    She was on in the first segment this am (Monday 11.Dec.2023), explaining that this is new to her over the weekend, she’ll be commenting in the future on Twitter regarding this, in her words, “for as long as Twitter will allow me”
    Dr. Carol Swain may be the most polite person I’ve ever heard speak on most topics.

    Which is just weird to me, I’d actually thought Claudine Gay would only be stealing work from those in her bed on the left…

    https://twitter.com/carolmswain/status/1734004123576537571

    “The book that won three national prizes and was cited by the Supreme Court. It was first published 1993, 1995, 2006.
    Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress

Navigation