Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Don't Run
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
A good pick, OJ. I had missed this news.
Leaving cloud cover out of computer climate models explains a lot of discrepancies with reality. It also exposes the blinders that the climate ideologues wear.
Michael Mann…..and here I had thought that arrogant Lying POS had disappeared into ignominy.
No surprise that he’s incapable of keeping his piehole shut…
Michael Mann is an overly-“educated” man of his times, who LOVES a spotlight. He would not be able to calculate a standard deviation or regression co-efficient, if his life credentials depended on it. Press a computer button and you will have a “science is settled” computer model to bilk the world.
Greenhouse gases were first researched in greenhouses in the 1800’s, all gases found lumped together. My scientifically logical question would be: do greenhouses and what was observed actually mimic what happens outdoors? I think not.
Even today, we are actually rather terrible at getting consistent data from existing information weather/climate sites, as people build urban centres and airports around them after installation. They cover the world badly, so there is no even barely accurate “world temperature measure”. Then so-called science agencies “adjust” numbers!
If your local weather person can not predict tomorrow, how good are ADJUSTED climate models?
Actually, global warming has been mostly positive for world progress. COOLING IS a problem. Ignoring history is very stupid.
THE OTHER PROBLEM IS SCIENCE FUNDING, designed to get “required” data.
So the biggest proponent of Mann-Made Global Warming (of a single tree in Siberia) has shown up again, I wonder if he ever paid the judgments against him?
Tree leaves + Mann = tea leaves.
The Mann v Steyn case is supposed to be actually making it to trial in January (16th?) of 2024. Eleven years and counting.
Don’t forget Rand Simberg in that; he compared Penn’s investigation of Sandusky to Penn’s investigation of Mann. He was right.
The Lies of Mann.
Fake Nobel winner, and failed human.