Three years ago, the principle of informed consent was unceremoniously dumped as a guidepost for public health matters. Most of the population seemed to have nearly limitless confidence in those who employed central planning to manage a pandemic response. Despite the subsequent train wreck, we are still seeing many individuals professing shock that they have been misled, once again.
When Brad MacLeod visited a pharmacy in Ancaster last week to get a COVID-19 vaccination, he was quite pleased. It was his sixth shot. But that happiness turned to alarm the next morning when MacLeod checked his vaccine certificate and realized he had received the same bivalent COVID-19 shot he received last November instead of the one he wanted — the new monovalent vaccine targeting the XBB.1.5 subvariant.
And who knew that the U of T has a Faculty of Information?
“There’s so much confusion around emerging variants and new vaccines and which protects against which that it’s very difficult for experts to stay abreast of what’s going on,” said Colin Furness, assistant professor with the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Information…
The confusion arises from a lack of facts and truth, as it always does.
“But that happiness turned to alarm……”
So whats his issue, just run in and get the other one!
6, 7, 20 whatever it takes dude, just keep injecting for the planet.
The Universities and Governments have innumerable useless departments!
I wonder how much cash the Dala Lana Institute received from Big Pharma ?
That might explain Dr. Fismans ridiculous paper on the “unvaccinated” being a danger to the vaxxed !
He wouldnt even defend this “research”.
Google Colin Furness.
He’s one of the COVID TV Ghouls who has been wrong about everything time and again. That must be a typo on the article, it has to be U of T Faculty of Misinformation.
RNrn
Just remember to clutch your pearls and not your chest.
“There’s so much confusion around emerging variants and new vaccines and which protects against which that it’s very difficult for experts to stay abreast of what’s going on,” So we just shoot people up with whatever’s close at hand.
Arty, At some point, I suspect they’ll quit with needles and just use guns to shoot people up.
Or, should that be, To SHUT people up…..permanently!
6th jab, eh? What a good little Canadian! Put this guy on a Molson can!
The U of T’s “Faculty of Information” must be the evil, well funded, academic underpinning of the federal Ministry of Truth (AKA the PMO’s Orifice.)
Hey! Let’s rewrite a Beatle tune….The Magical Mystery Jab
Roll up, roll up for the mystery jab,.
Got an invitation…
Roll up for the mystery jab…
To get an infestation
Rollup for the mystery jab…
THE MAGIGAL MYSTERY JAB IS COMING TO TAKE YOU AWAY.
Coming to take you, today…
Mystery chip…uh huh…
ET Fooking Cetera.
Have a nice day
6th jab…
Can I have his stuff?
Yeah, yeah…crazy conspiracy theorist. We can debate in 2025.
Jah Get da jab.
More jab .
All Jab.
Trust Dear Leader.
Dear Leader Loves you.
VOWG is absolutely right..So Stupid we think we are Smart…Canada Can Ahh Duh!.
Bait and Switch. Oldest scam in the world.
Get the jab and be safe. So the claim is the latest jab is a totally new formula. So I am sure it has been rigorously tested(Ha,Ha). Of course no standard risk assessment tools were used to determine if the jab was more dangerous than the virus. At least 40% still are terrified by covid. Funny thing is the people I hear complaining the most about illness seem to have the most jabs.
But they are not done yet. They are doubling down and more.
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/nobel-prize-medicine-awarded-mrna-155701400.html
Personally, I think it’s time to start pointing the finger at people like Mr. MacLeod and point out that his consistent acquisition of the various “vaccines” and “boosters” is fueling an evolutionary process in the virus which expedites and encourages variants.
In other words…time to start handing it back to these good people. “Doctor!!! Doctor!!! It hurts when I do this!!! Well, asshole, then don’t DO that.
L – Below it outlines the Canadian Medical Protective Association advice for informed
consent. They are the legal insurance organization for physicians. Presumably, this
would be approved by their legal counsel.
Speaking from memory, when attended lectures on the legal principle of Duty of Care-
Standard of Care, the example used, applied to medicine. Emphasis was placed on the legal/moral responsibility of medical professionals to be up to date on the latest research and
clinical information applicable to the advice and medical procedures and pharmaceuticals
in question. As patients, we’d hope physicians, nurses and pharmacists would practice
guided by the highest tradition of medical ethics, skill and best judgment.
During Covid-19, those medical professionals, who did their due diligence became as famous, as the dissidents of the former Soviet Union; and for the same reason.
Physicians have sometimes found that the price of a really, good, heavy hitter of a lawyer,
when their licence, reputation, practice is at stake. That may be more expensive than their insurance company’s choice of adequate/competent legal counsel. Like professional
athletes and actors, lawyers who can eviscerate competing counsel and witnesses and
keep judges spellbound and on their toes cost more for a reason.
View the link to see the current description of CMPA version of Informed Consent.
—————————————————————————————————————————–
“It is a basic accepted legal principle that “every human being of adult years and of sound
mind has the right to determine what shall be done with his or her own body.”…
https://www.cmpa-acpm.ca/en/education-events/good-practices/physician-patient/informed-consent
“But the studies have shown that the XBB is still effective against the ones that came out after XBB, so that’s why we’re just going to recommend using that for this year,” explained Dr. Jeff Kwong, a family physician and associate director at the U of T Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases.
Serious question for Dr. Kwong – “What studies?”
Please provide the citations supporting your statement.
No one who got the Pfizer jab could have given informed consent because what Pfizer got approval for wasn’t what got injected into people. ‘Process 1’ and Process 2’.
“And who knew that the U of T has a Faculty of Information?”
I believe the Deans name is Josef Goebbels.
Dumb enough to take six shots and is still alive. Time get out and buy that lottery ticket fella.
99 percent of the people who reside in Old Peopleville got their sixth jabajaba and 99 percent are sick with colds etc. seriously sick. I’m sure there is no connection to their sixth shot and the clot shot right?
Why would that guy care which jab he has gotten. They all are going to kill him anyways. Seriously, my patience has run thin with these covidians. Why should hospitals even treat these people? They made those decisions so they have to live with them, am I right? Lol that’s what they said to us pure bloods