39 Replies to “The Well Known Medical Intervention That Shall Not Be Named”
It’s quite impressive that Dr. Campbell has gone from being a cautious supporter of Covid ‘vaccine’ to his current status of an informed critic. I think his earliest realization that their was something evil going on was the propaganda campaign against Ivermectin.
His coverage is a welcome start, but how many will actually see any of this?
What he needs to do now is look at the birth rate. I keep hearing that it is down, but by how much? Then he can put the two together and get an idea of the change in population.
One possibility they did not consider is this: COVID infection often caused serious damage to vital organs like hearts, lungs, brains, and kidneys. See for example…
Given that this damage is often lasting, it can contribute to deaths months or years after the infection has passed, and thus would not be registered as an official COVID death.
For lasting lung damage caused by COVID, see here:
So KM , if what you are saying is truly correct , not only did the jab not stop transmission, nor being infected, but it doesn’t protect you from serious illness or death either. Yep, safe and effective.
So you want a vaccine that’s 100% effective against infection and transmission? Doesn’t exist. It never has for any disease. The reason is that vaccines do not attack the infection directly, but rather induce the immune system to generate antibodies that attack the infection. But everyone’s immune system is different, making a perfect result impossible.
But numerous studies showed that COVID vaccines reduced the chances of severe symptoms and mortality:
To quote, “VE (vaccine effectiveness) against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19 waned over time but protection remained high against severe COVID-19. “
Number one it isn’t a vaccine. But since you want to go there. How many vaccines required absolute immunity from liability? How many vaccines wanted to subvert safety data for 75 years? How many vaccinated people died in Canada in the last 5 years who were vaccinated for polio or diphtheria or tetnas of these diseases?Do any readers here know of people who have died of these diseases with up to date vaccinations? Who had complications from these diseases? How about covid complications or death after 3 or 4 jabs? Meanwhile, I have 2 more funerals to go to.
“How many vaccines required absolute immunity from liability?”
So far as I know, all vaccine manufacturs have liability protection. It’s standard procedure. That’s because all vaccines entail some risk. They do not, however, have absolute immunity. Willful acts of wrong doing are not generally protected.
In the U.S. there is 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22…
“No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.”
I would be happy with the 98 or 99% that smallpox gives,
I would be happy with the 5 years from tetanus. Not the less than 6 months from Covid.
Your argument has been tried before but failed because the example they used had never had covid, so how can they die because of a side effect of Covid when they have never had it, they did have multiple vaccine shots.
But we don’t have excess deaths in Australia, they all died of sads
Again you destroy your own argument. It never met the standard protocols and timeline for the development of a vaccine, time tested protocols to establish the safety. The known risks and effectiveness were hidden until until forced disclosure in England by a lawsuit. It is an experimental treatment. The informed consent required in the link you posted was not provided. The drug companies refused to provide the drug unless the governments assumed liability for adverse outcomes. By any normal use of standard risk management tools this drug would have been kicked to the curb.
concerned:
It WAS an experimental treatment. That was a necessary evil, given the urgency of the situation.
But with hundreds (possibly thousands) of studies having been done, the original vaccines are now amongst the most studied and understood in the world.
And no vaccine maker releases a vaccine for any disease without being protected from liability. It is standard procedure.
Yeah, well given that the “vaccines” lower overall immunity, not only do the “vaccinated” carry the ticking time bomb of the “vaccine”, but they also get COVID. Great way to bury the real villain isn’t it?
The evidence that COVID vaccines lower overall immunity is weak, and seems to be limited to a single paper:
Thanks Killer, you have provided another perspective. I appreciate your diligence in bringing these papers and data forward. I certainly carry a negative bias towards this injectable gene manipulation but based on reading your posts over the years I have come to learn you are diligent and can be trusted to present what you believe is the truth. That is all we can ask of each other after all. I’ll get digging into your links. Cheers.
Ah, but people under 50 were not getting serious Covid. But they are getting the vaccine side effects. I am beginning to think that Killer Marmot is Theresa Tam.
I think KM is brought to you by Pfizer or Moderns. Unfortunately, I’m not surprised about the excess deaths in Canada. Besides the vaccines, there are increased deaths from hopelessness (depression, overdoses, MAID program) and from undetected disease due to lockdowns and medial appointment disruptions.
Something to remember is that the spike protein is toxic, whether from the infection or vaccine. Speculation is that damage from infection is less severe because of mucosal compartmentalization since natural infection is through the nose, mouth and eyes. Natural infection also does not introduce lipid nanoparticles, plasmid contamination from mRNA manufacturing process and other chemical products that maximize spike production over a relatively long period of time.
The other confounding variable is that many of those with long covid also have had the vaccines. The only way to sort out if it’s the vaccines or natural infection causing the problem is to look for the presence or absence of nucleocapsid proteins. Covid Nucleocapsid proteins are only found in natural infection.
“Ah, but people under 50 were not getting serious Covid.”
First, that doesn’t undercut the possibility that long-term organ damage caused by COVID is now contributing to excess deaths. It just means that most of those deaths are among older people.
Second, it isn’t true that young people never suffered severe symptoms:
“In individuals at low risk of COVID-19 mortality with ongoing symptoms, 70% have impairment in one or more organs 4 months after initial COVID-19 symptoms, with implications for healthcare and public health, which have assumed low risk in young people with no comorbidities.”
KM:
You are being wilfully ignorant as well as being deceitful.
The statement that “People under 50 were not getting serious Covid” is true. The fact that a few young people got seriously ill, and at the same time tested positive for Covid using a PCR test, does not contradict that the vast overwhelming majority of young people who tested positive had no negative outcome, and does not invalidate the truth of the previous statement.
Stating that “It isn’t true that young people never suffered severe symptoms” is confusing due to the double negative. Yes, some young people suffered severe symptoms. Some of them died. However, no mature discussion can possibly be had without discussion of relative risk profiles. Which you are ignoring using this line of argument.
Using one or two exceptions to attempt to disprove a general statement is silly, naive, and juvenile. As is posting links to various press releases and summary papers. This is a rhetorical argument, not a dialectic one, and you are losing.
You are losing this persuation competition so badly you don’t even know you are competing, I think.
The blog owner has asked that people stay civil. I recommend you keep to that, although it’s entirely up to you.
But the statement “People under 50 were not getting serious Covid” is transparently false. Even one counter case makes it’s so. Take LindaL to task for her lack of precision.
But there’s more than one case. GoC statistics say that over 20% of COVID hospitizations were under 50 years of age, and about the same percentage for admission to intensive care. Mortality was, thankfully, far less.
… and the study population was, “Participants: Individuals ≥18 years with persistent symptoms following recovery from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and age-matched healthy controls.”
People with persistent symptoms 4 months after becoming sick were found to not be as healthy as age-matched healthy people. If there is a surprise in there I can’t find it.
The key finding is that among those with persistent COVID symptoms, 70% had impairment of one or more organs.
I’ve valued his opinion and perspective on many subjects over the years. This one is unpopular but its coming from a position of his perceived truth.
Me thinks you and KM should get a room together, the 2 of you ” doth protest too much “.
You guys chose to object to my opinion. You’re the ones kvetching.
There’s one big problem with you argument. The virus was circulating a year and half before the deaths started and the unvaccinated are not dying off at the same rate as the vaccinated. Where one can actually find real data not muddied or “adjusted” by nonsense like any adverse reaction days 0-13 (0-21 in Sask and BC) being counted as unvaccinated such data has consistently shown the vaccinated are the ones getting sicker longer, faster and more often of a whole assortment of things compared to the vaxxed. And the business about it reducing hospitalisation and severe illness is just plain nonsense.
Well, we know one thing. If the powers that be could attribute any of this excess to the Wuhan flu, it damned well wouldn’t be filed under ‘unexplained’.
TPTB were telling us as early as April 2020 that we will never have a normal life again without the vaccine.
They didn’t have a vaccine. They still don’t have a vaccine. Your best bet to navigate today is to ignore everything you were told the last 3 years.
And don’t get vaxxed.
Does anyone else find the way the Canadian government is presenting the data kind of odd? The baseline data makes sense. The 95% confidence interval, well, okay but seems unnecessary. Using adjusted excess death and only presenting the numbers at the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of excess death, hmmm, why? Why adjusted data only and why only the lower band? What’s the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval of excess deaths?
Are Canada’s excess death numbers so bad that these data contortions became necessary to obscure the gravity of the situation.
IN a word, YES. The numbers are so bad they have to do stuff like this to hide how bad it is from the general public. I can assure sure the statisticians I know looking at the data are absolutely horrified at the implications. Our government is clearly out to kill as many of us off as possible.
Now I get it.
It kills men.
Jack Fanning
6 hours ago
Dr. Campbell,
Here are the tallies for cumulative excess mortality by age and sex in Nova Scotia, Canada as of week ending 02/04/23:
Over 65 years of age:
Males – 863 excess deaths
Females – 66 excess deaths
Under 65 years of age:
Males – 464 excess deaths
Females – 76 excess deaths
The upward trend started week ending 05/08/21 and hasn’t looked back since.
Vaccinations for the general public started 03/15/21.
This is a democide of Men.
And so I ask you, is the current sound of crickets surrounding excess deaths intentional as it is mostly in men?
Is this trend seen in other countries like the US or UK?
Any Liberal party official will tell you there are not excess deaths… that’s why they have the MAiD program.
Everybody knows something is wrong.. Stick your head in the sand?.. Never mind lockdowns, after bloody destructive wars the population always bounces back.. What going on here is as unprecedented as the vaccine mandates themselves..
What they did was criminal on so many levels.. Mass murder so they could Hail Mary Trumps MAGA movement.. CRIMINAL.. I don’t care if it was star chamber or organic power grab.. Those responsible are responsible for their actions..
I believe the population is not going to bounce back after this round. The vax causes infertility. I hope I am wrong.
” The vax causes infertility ” and the Elephant in the room is , for how many generations ?
That’s a pretty good joke. Was it meant as one?
This paper says that the vaccines do not impair fertility…
It’s quite impressive that Dr. Campbell has gone from being a cautious supporter of Covid ‘vaccine’ to his current status of an informed critic. I think his earliest realization that their was something evil going on was the propaganda campaign against Ivermectin.
If you hadn’t saved this vid. earlier, here’s the link…
https://twitter.com/michaelpsenger/status/1660856504751194112
His coverage is a welcome start, but how many will actually see any of this?
What he needs to do now is look at the birth rate. I keep hearing that it is down, but by how much? Then he can put the two together and get an idea of the change in population.
One possibility they did not consider is this: COVID infection often caused serious damage to vital organs like hearts, lungs, brains, and kidneys. See for example…
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/heart-problems-after-covid19
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2789793
Given that this damage is often lasting, it can contribute to deaths months or years after the infection has passed, and thus would not be registered as an official COVID death.
For lasting lung damage caused by COVID, see here:
https://www.thoracic.org/about/newsroom/press-releases/journal/2022/lung-damage-after-covid-19-hospitalization.php
Note the quote:
“for others they may lead to longer term lung fibrosis progression, worse quality of life and decreased life expectancy.”
And kidneys:
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/coronavirus-kidney-damage-caused-by-covid19
So KM , if what you are saying is truly correct , not only did the jab not stop transmission, nor being infected, but it doesn’t protect you from serious illness or death either. Yep, safe and effective.
So you want a vaccine that’s 100% effective against infection and transmission? Doesn’t exist. It never has for any disease. The reason is that vaccines do not attack the infection directly, but rather induce the immune system to generate antibodies that attack the infection. But everyone’s immune system is different, making a perfect result impossible.
But numerous studies showed that COVID vaccines reduced the chances of severe symptoms and mortality:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(23)00015-2/fulltext#:~:text=Vaccine%20effectiveness%20at%20baseline%20was,168%E2%80%93195%20days%20for%20mortality.
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y
To quote, “VE (vaccine effectiveness) against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19 waned over time but protection remained high against severe COVID-19. “
Number one it isn’t a vaccine. But since you want to go there. How many vaccines required absolute immunity from liability? How many vaccines wanted to subvert safety data for 75 years? How many vaccinated people died in Canada in the last 5 years who were vaccinated for polio or diphtheria or tetnas of these diseases?Do any readers here know of people who have died of these diseases with up to date vaccinations? Who had complications from these diseases? How about covid complications or death after 3 or 4 jabs? Meanwhile, I have 2 more funerals to go to.
“How many vaccines required absolute immunity from liability?”
So far as I know, all vaccine manufacturs have liability protection. It’s standard procedure. That’s because all vaccines entail some risk. They do not, however, have absolute immunity. Willful acts of wrong doing are not generally protected.
In the U.S. there is 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22…
“No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.”
And in Canada…
https://globalnews.ca/news/7521148/coronavirus-vaccine-safety-liability-government-anand-pfizer/
I would be happy with the 98 or 99% that smallpox gives,
I would be happy with the 5 years from tetanus. Not the less than 6 months from Covid.
Your argument has been tried before but failed because the example they used had never had covid, so how can they die because of a side effect of Covid when they have never had it, they did have multiple vaccine shots.
But we don’t have excess deaths in Australia, they all died of sads
Again you destroy your own argument. It never met the standard protocols and timeline for the development of a vaccine, time tested protocols to establish the safety. The known risks and effectiveness were hidden until until forced disclosure in England by a lawsuit. It is an experimental treatment. The informed consent required in the link you posted was not provided. The drug companies refused to provide the drug unless the governments assumed liability for adverse outcomes. By any normal use of standard risk management tools this drug would have been kicked to the curb.
concerned:
It WAS an experimental treatment. That was a necessary evil, given the urgency of the situation.
But with hundreds (possibly thousands) of studies having been done, the original vaccines are now amongst the most studied and understood in the world.
And no vaccine maker releases a vaccine for any disease without being protected from liability. It is standard procedure.
Yeah, well given that the “vaccines” lower overall immunity, not only do the “vaccinated” carry the ticking time bomb of the “vaccine”, but they also get COVID. Great way to bury the real villain isn’t it?
The evidence that COVID vaccines lower overall immunity is weak, and seems to be limited to a single paper:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220726130424/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
A lot of researchers have taken issue with that paper. Their objections are listed here:
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/covid-19-vaccines-dont-weaken-immune-system-lancet-study-misrepresented-tucker-carlson-hodgetwins/
Thanks Killer, you have provided another perspective. I appreciate your diligence in bringing these papers and data forward. I certainly carry a negative bias towards this injectable gene manipulation but based on reading your posts over the years I have come to learn you are diligent and can be trusted to present what you believe is the truth. That is all we can ask of each other after all. I’ll get digging into your links. Cheers.
Ah, but people under 50 were not getting serious Covid. But they are getting the vaccine side effects. I am beginning to think that Killer Marmot is Theresa Tam.
I think KM is brought to you by Pfizer or Moderns. Unfortunately, I’m not surprised about the excess deaths in Canada. Besides the vaccines, there are increased deaths from hopelessness (depression, overdoses, MAID program) and from undetected disease due to lockdowns and medial appointment disruptions.
Something to remember is that the spike protein is toxic, whether from the infection or vaccine. Speculation is that damage from infection is less severe because of mucosal compartmentalization since natural infection is through the nose, mouth and eyes. Natural infection also does not introduce lipid nanoparticles, plasmid contamination from mRNA manufacturing process and other chemical products that maximize spike production over a relatively long period of time.
The other confounding variable is that many of those with long covid also have had the vaccines. The only way to sort out if it’s the vaccines or natural infection causing the problem is to look for the presence or absence of nucleocapsid proteins. Covid Nucleocapsid proteins are only found in natural infection.
“Ah, but people under 50 were not getting serious Covid.”
First, that doesn’t undercut the possibility that long-term organ damage caused by COVID is now contributing to excess deaths. It just means that most of those deaths are among older people.
Second, it isn’t true that young people never suffered severe symptoms:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33785495/
To quote:
“In individuals at low risk of COVID-19 mortality with ongoing symptoms, 70% have impairment in one or more organs 4 months after initial COVID-19 symptoms, with implications for healthcare and public health, which have assumed low risk in young people with no comorbidities.”
KM:
You are being wilfully ignorant as well as being deceitful.
The statement that “People under 50 were not getting serious Covid” is true. The fact that a few young people got seriously ill, and at the same time tested positive for Covid using a PCR test, does not contradict that the vast overwhelming majority of young people who tested positive had no negative outcome, and does not invalidate the truth of the previous statement.
Stating that “It isn’t true that young people never suffered severe symptoms” is confusing due to the double negative. Yes, some young people suffered severe symptoms. Some of them died. However, no mature discussion can possibly be had without discussion of relative risk profiles. Which you are ignoring using this line of argument.
Using one or two exceptions to attempt to disprove a general statement is silly, naive, and juvenile. As is posting links to various press releases and summary papers. This is a rhetorical argument, not a dialectic one, and you are losing.
You are losing this persuation competition so badly you don’t even know you are competing, I think.
The blog owner has asked that people stay civil. I recommend you keep to that, although it’s entirely up to you.
But the statement “People under 50 were not getting serious Covid” is transparently false. Even one counter case makes it’s so. Take LindaL to task for her lack of precision.
But there’s more than one case. GoC statistics say that over 20% of COVID hospitizations were under 50 years of age, and about the same percentage for admission to intensive care. Mortality was, thankfully, far less.
https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/current-situation.html?stat=num&measure=cases_weekly&map=pt#a2
… and the study population was, “Participants: Individuals ≥18 years with persistent symptoms following recovery from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and age-matched healthy controls.”
People with persistent symptoms 4 months after becoming sick were found to not be as healthy as age-matched healthy people. If there is a surprise in there I can’t find it.
The key finding is that among those with persistent COVID symptoms, 70% had impairment of one or more organs.
I’ve valued his opinion and perspective on many subjects over the years. This one is unpopular but its coming from a position of his perceived truth.
Me thinks you and KM should get a room together, the 2 of you ” doth protest too much “.
You guys chose to object to my opinion. You’re the ones kvetching.
There’s one big problem with you argument. The virus was circulating a year and half before the deaths started and the unvaccinated are not dying off at the same rate as the vaccinated. Where one can actually find real data not muddied or “adjusted” by nonsense like any adverse reaction days 0-13 (0-21 in Sask and BC) being counted as unvaccinated such data has consistently shown the vaccinated are the ones getting sicker longer, faster and more often of a whole assortment of things compared to the vaxxed. And the business about it reducing hospitalisation and severe illness is just plain nonsense.
Well, we know one thing. If the powers that be could attribute any of this excess to the Wuhan flu, it damned well wouldn’t be filed under ‘unexplained’.
TPTB were telling us as early as April 2020 that we will never have a normal life again without the vaccine.
They didn’t have a vaccine. They still don’t have a vaccine. Your best bet to navigate today is to ignore everything you were told the last 3 years.
And don’t get vaxxed.
Does anyone else find the way the Canadian government is presenting the data kind of odd? The baseline data makes sense. The 95% confidence interval, well, okay but seems unnecessary. Using adjusted excess death and only presenting the numbers at the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of excess death, hmmm, why? Why adjusted data only and why only the lower band? What’s the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval of excess deaths?
Are Canada’s excess death numbers so bad that these data contortions became necessary to obscure the gravity of the situation.
IN a word, YES. The numbers are so bad they have to do stuff like this to hide how bad it is from the general public. I can assure sure the statisticians I know looking at the data are absolutely horrified at the implications. Our government is clearly out to kill as many of us off as possible.
Now I get it.
It kills men.
Jack Fanning
6 hours ago
Dr. Campbell,
Here are the tallies for cumulative excess mortality by age and sex in Nova Scotia, Canada as of week ending 02/04/23:
Over 65 years of age:
Males – 863 excess deaths
Females – 66 excess deaths
Under 65 years of age:
Males – 464 excess deaths
Females – 76 excess deaths
The upward trend started week ending 05/08/21 and hasn’t looked back since.
Vaccinations for the general public started 03/15/21.
This is a democide of Men.
And so I ask you, is the current sound of crickets surrounding excess deaths intentional as it is mostly in men?
Is this trend seen in other countries like the US or UK?
Any Liberal party official will tell you there are not excess deaths… that’s why they have the MAiD program.
Everybody knows something is wrong.. Stick your head in the sand?.. Never mind lockdowns, after bloody destructive wars the population always bounces back.. What going on here is as unprecedented as the vaccine mandates themselves..
What they did was criminal on so many levels.. Mass murder so they could Hail Mary Trumps MAGA movement.. CRIMINAL.. I don’t care if it was star chamber or organic power grab.. Those responsible are responsible for their actions..
I believe the population is not going to bounce back after this round. The vax causes infertility. I hope I am wrong.
” The vax causes infertility ” and the Elephant in the room is , for how many generations ?
That’s a pretty good joke. Was it meant as one?
This paper says that the vaccines do not impair fertility…
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464596/
Do you have evidence to the contrary?
Notice. NOT a single rebuttal to this study.
So everyone agrees.. Yeah hardly.
Not catching up fast enough folks. The damage has been done.