Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
So what do you think the chances are all the environmental criteria and consultations can be completed by 2030 when coal is to be shut down? I believe there are 2. Slim and none.
Best 2 sites:
1) Downtown Regina
2) Downtown Saskatoon
If residents don’t want them, then cut them off. It is the urban idiots who fall for this green crap, let them live with their worst nightmare….oh no, not nuclear power!!!!
I am quite happy to keep burning that best of renewables: coal, followed by petro, followed by wood.
A water supply is important so close to Wascana slough is a good spot.
Basement of the SaskPower building wouldn’t be bad.
Next to the biggest consumers of energy would be a good choice, that would reduce transmission and conversion losses…
But I’m sure that they never even though of that…
Ya know, JD, I’m not sure that’s the best course of action. It’s well known the ‘slickers don’t GAF about rural folk. Give the bastards reliable nuclear energy, they’ll take a holier than thou position & care even less if carbon based energy remains on the table for non-urban areas.
On the other hand, if they take a look around at the reliable rural nuclear power while their own wind/solar fails miserably, they’d be on board pretty damn fast.
The only built SMRs are in Russia and China with one under construction in Argentina. Several on the drawing board. I think you are being optimistic that Canada, rapidly becoming a backward green dystopia, will show any serious interest in the only future energy option after fossils that can deliver prosperity. An independent Sask could more easily do so but why would they not continue to use their coal at least until facility replacement time.
I was not aware there were any SMRs in production anywhere. Do you have some links to those? I’m interested in the real-world effectiveness of this technology.
I think you should check this out;
https://www.opg.com/powering-ontario/our-generation/nuclear/darlington-nuclear/darlington-new-nuclear/