“on its own”
Trust the Evidence- The SARS-CoV-2 transmission riddle – Part 3
Learning point: The lower the Ct, the higher the chance of infectivity: this is due to the nature of PCR which amplifies the target viral components through a series of cycles. The higher the concentration of viral components in the sample, the sooner the amplifications stop and the lower the number of cycles needed to identify the component.
However, those people with pre-existing pathologies or whose immune system is partly compromised may continue excreting infectious particles for a very long time, with a Ct which dips when they become infectious and may go up again when their defences are successfully fighting the virus.
For the vast majority of healthy people, though, peak infectiousness lasts just a few days before the infection wanes. Sometimes it precedes the onset of symptoms, or there are no symptoms at all, or the symptoms are minimal. When their immune systems have successfully neutralized the virus, they may continue to expel fragments for weeks or even months. These are picked up by PCR, but their good health and high Ct should testify to their recovered status – if you record the details.
Herein lies the insanity of mass screening with PCR in the absence of sufficient information and detailed follow-up of each person tested. It explains why so many people still test “positive” even though they are no longer infectious.
Dread Covid Theatre uses the “Red Queen” definition of terms.
Now it is required,in Law and Engineering,every practical trade and constructive effort to first “Define Your Terms”.
Otherwise we find our selves building what the architect dreamed and confounding the bill payers requirements.
The constant redefining of terms is your first indication that “Some one is lying”.
So where is my Pandemic?
I was told we had a pandemic ,at least as bad as the Spanish Flu and computed to mimic the Black Plague..Thus we must be imprisoned in our home,covered with paper breath restrictors and ordered about by Authoritarian Nitwits..Instead I got the Seasonal Flu and colds..
And as this article observes the terms they keep right on changing..
How anyone expects to carry out any analysis of what happened,how many were victims and so on,using “Official Government Numbers” is beyond me.
The numbers are useless.
Deliberately so.
We watched the goal posts be moved.
So in the interests of justice,I say hang them all.
As per the Pope circa 1200 AD..”Kill them all,God will know his own”.
Every politician and minion who declared “Emergency” and every person who played along ,long after they knew better,deserves to be “Rightly Rewarded” for their help.
Barring a gruesome orgy of revenge,the banning of all these helpers from the public payroll is the minimum acceptable standard.
They must never be permitted to “help” us again.
This is directly from the horse’s mouth, the BC Centre for Disease Control, April 30, 2020, the last paragraph of a two page info sheet for health professionals (NAT=PCR):
“Ultimately, for COVID-19 testing, there is currently no gold standard, and the overall clinical sensitivity and specificity of NAT in patients with COVID-19 infection is unknown (i.e., how well NAT results correlate with clinical infection, “true positivity” or “true negativity” rate). ”
http://www.bccdc.ca/Health-Professionals-Site/Documents/COVID19_InterpretingTesting_Results_NAT_PCR.pdf
The SARS-CoV-2 falls into the exact same basket as Dark Matter…
https://www.realclearscience.com/2022/07/13/dark_matter_doesnt_exist_842209.html
Kary Mullis, who co-won the Nobel Prize in ’93 for the PCR process stated that a positive PCR test was not proof by itself as a virus that has been defeated by your immune system would also create a positive result. He stated that a blood culture test was needed to confirm that the virus was still alive in a patient’s blood.
The excessive cycles guaranteed there would be lots of false positives and the lack of blood culture testing meant the false positives were never proven incorrect.
What a mess and there is no way to reconstruct the botched data collection.
A feature,not an accident.