Safe And Effective ®

Children R Our Future Safe and Effective Wuhan Flu 51 Comments

@Andrew Bostom, MD, MS: “Landmark” NEJM study affirming C19 vax safety in pregnancy admits major analysis flaw

“No denominator was available to calculate a risk estimate for spontaneous abortions, because at the time of this report, follow-up through 20 weeks was not yet available for 905 of the 1224 participants vaccinated within 30 days before the first day of the last menstrual period or in the first trimester. Furthermore, any risk estimate would need to account for gestational week–specific risk of spontaneous abortion.”

Full text here: Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons

51 Replies to “Safe And Effective ®”

      2. Well VOWG, there actually is a vaxxine for SarsCov Canine verison..!! It was supposedly the first SarsCov vax they ever built & included the S1 Spike Protein – Ace 2 Receptor – Ace Domain…etc.

        All the way back in 1999…at least thats what I digested from Dr David Martins Deposition..??

        Maybe Chime in on this Kate….? I’m a forever dog owner but never heard of this in the past….that is if “canine” in this instance actually means dogs..??

  2. All major vaccine manufacturers will probably be shielded by govs anyway. And Prime Moron, Xiden etc will not care if by any chance you lost pregnancy. Their true mantra is “OUR benefits far outweigh YOUR risks”.

    Another case, as example, from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, about Cutter Incident/1955:

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1383764/

    I know, it was loong time ago, and since then many things have changed. But still, not for mRNA, which is something new.

    Also, read carefully to the end:

    “The contemporary climate of risk aversion and predatory litigation deters the introduction of new vaccines and discourages innovation in a field which boasts some of the most impressive achievements of modern medicine. To protect vaccine development—and ultimately public health —Offit proposes that the option of suing vaccine manufacturers should be stopped and that compensation should only be available through the official programme.”

    1. “All major vaccine manufacturers will probably be shielded by govs anyway. ”

      “Will”? they already are Dan. By law! As a condition of bringing the vaccines to the markets the governments had to guarantee the manufacturers complete immunity from prosecution. Otherwise the manufacturers would sell the vaccine elsewhere and the government would be toppled the next day by the panicked population. Thus big pharma owns literarily every government in the western world. They’re in the same boat. No exaggeration. Because the governments guaranteed them immunity their hands are tided even if they wanted to do something. So the governments find it much easier to seek their media lapdogs and their JBT enforcers on dissenters rather than seriously look at the harm the vaccines are doing. The governments must now exaggerate the threat of Wuhan Flu and whip the population into a constant state of panic and submission or the public will eventually gather their wits and start asking the hard questions.
      Full disclosure: I am vaccinated, I do believe that for vulnerable people vaccines actually do more good than harm, and I know that Wuhan Flu isn’t really a flu and it can in very rare occasions be serious. And I am not an “anti-vaxxer” in general either.

      1. Yes, this clause must be #1 when the big purchase contract is signed. What I still don’t understand is this: why ON, NB are going with this BS of passport vaccines? Having 0, 1 or 2 vaccine jabs has nothing to do with infection. You can get it no matter if the guy near you has the vaccine(s) or not. There are also unknowns (we don’t know 100% that the vaccine is safe, we don’t know if it’s effective against new strains), still – the passport vaccine enforcement kinda makes vaccination mandatory.
        For the record, I am also X2 vaccinated. Also for the record, I strongly oppose this BS of Covid fascism. How is that quote? When you sacrifice a bit of freedom for safety, you lose both (?)

  3. …and yet BC’s Bonnie Bullshit was on the news this AM proclaiming that they were safe for pregnant women.

    oh look…they’re using the woke nonsense term “pregnant persons”. Why give any credence to this?

    1. Yes indeed, Bonnie Nazi looked close to cracking.

      How long can she up the lies, distortions, and wishful thinking, when the opposite is entirely true?

      Anyone else notice the stats Glowbull put up, for “unvaxxed” in the ICU? Last week, it was 92%.

      Yesterday it was 75%. For the mathematically challenged, in one week, the vaxxed went from 8% to 25% occupancy of ICUs.

      In one week. The lies can’t keep hidden much longer by these evil government miscreants.

      EVIL!

  4. Sorry. I am having trouble following this. What does it say? Too much double speak and medical jargon for me to understand.

    2. As well 0 income divided by zero =
      GST rebate plus welfare plus GIS plus soon free daycare for your children with no fathers, plus free housing plus free drugs on pharma care. oops, you might have to get dressed and earn $10 a weekday for the kids.

  6. Bonnie Bullshit and her fellow medical officers of health are quickly becoming morally indistinguishable from Josef Mengele and his cohorts.

  7. It goes deeper than that. The Pfizer efficacy numbers are meaningless garbage.

    Pfizer administered saline to a control group and the real vax to a second group. This brief trial lasted a few months and Pfizer claimed 95% efficacy.

    They then informed the control group who had been given saline , who were then offered the real vax .. most accepted and as a result Pfizer effectively erased the control group from any further efficacy measurements.

    1. “They then informed the control group who had been given saline , who were then offered the real vax…”

      …Which is what long-standing pharmaceutical research ethics protocols dictate one should do when dealing with (1) a new product that demonstrates safety and efficacy in clinical trials, (2) amidst an ongoing public health threat to which members of the control group may themselves be susceptible. Under those conditions, it would be unethical to knowingly withhold from control group members the opportunity to receive the vaccine simply to preserve one’s long-term research potential.

      2. How do you determine long term effects with no control group?
        And let’s not pretend this is Ebola Ted.

      3. Teddy Teddy Teddy

        Pfizer did not perform 1 Clinical TRIAL….if you put the Jab in your deltoid, YOU Are now part of the Trial….oh and ANIMAL Testing.?? I understand that 4 Sets were performed. NOT 1 ANIMAL Survived.

        This SHIT’s still under an EUA….and that means Pfizer or Moderna can mix n match any number of ingredients as they like from100% Saline all the way to one with 45 Trillion S1 Spike Protens – Once APPROVED However, then said ingredient mix remains Static. No changes allowed.
        Clinical trials my ass….

        MY thoughts on the current crop of mRNA VAX..??
        This SHIT is a Mild GOF imbued BIO-WEAPON meant to significantly DEGRADE the immune system response of those who took the initial jabs’ setting them up for the REAL HAMMER to come……. and I’m betting THAT is not that far off buddy boy….Before Christmas.??

  8. Golly, does anyone have a functioning brain anymore? This shit is killing people and the idiots want more of it. Stupid does not begin to describe what we are experiencing.

  9. The Shimabukuro et al. article from June 2021 that Bostom refers to here was a preliminary report from the CDC’s v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team. Their original manuscript included some analytical errors; they corrected them. This perhaps means the opposite of what you think (or want to believe) it means.

    Since then, the same research team has released more comprehensive data on mRNA vaccines and risk of spontaneous abortions, described in this September 2021 NJEM report. Their bottom-line findings:

    “As compared with data from two historical cohorts that represent the lower and upper ranges of spontaneous-abortion risk, the cumulative risks of spontaneous abortion from our primary and sensitivity analyses were within the expected risk range. Limitations of our study include the lack of a control group of unvaccinated pregnant persons, the homogeneity of the participants in terms of racial and ethnic groups and occupation, the voluntary enrollment of the population, and the use of data reported by the participants themselves, including some data collected retrospectively. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that the risk of spontaneous abortion after mRNA Covid-19 vaccination either before conception or during pregnancy is consistent with the expected risk of spontaneous abortion; these findings add to the accumulating evidence about the safety of mRNA Covid-19 vaccination in pregnancy.”

    1. Hey Fed, you forgot to highlight this part “Limitations of our study include the lack of a control group of unvaccinated pregnant persons,…”

    2. Their bottom-line findings are at odds with their explicitly-stated inability to calculate a risk estimate for pre-pregnancy or first trimester “vaccinations”.

  10. Dr. Pierre Kory is questioning the high impact journals like New England Journal of Medicine and is saying they are compromised.
    He is becoming hesitant about everything he reads there because they are captured by Big Pharma.
    Its not only the bias in what they choose to print, its what they are excluding and he wonders about their validity.
    Its queued it up to the 8:45 part and the story develops at 11:50 for those who lack the time.
    They whole video is good and worth watching
    https://youtu.be/qBuSjMo8NK0?t=525

    1. Wow, what a revelation to tune into. Started at the 4 hour mark and was astonished at hearing unvarnished facts! Thanks for sharing that.

    2. “Dr. Pierre Kory is questioning the high impact journals like New England Journal of Medicine and is saying they are compromised.”

      Yes, no sh1t. 100% political on a whole list of subjects. In the 1990s I read all the medical literature on gun control, and papers in the NEJM didn’t even pass the giggle test. (If you read the abstract and laugh because it is so egregiously stupid, that’s a fail.)

      If they’ll happily lie about gun control which doesn’t even have any money in it, just imagine what they’ll do for pay. These days you don’t have to imagine, just watch in wonder as they drink gasoline and then swallow a match like Daffy Duck.

    3. Quick

      That became quite obvious way back in June/July of last year when Lancet & NE journal Published the Utterly Fraudulent “studies” on Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin…
      100% GARBAGE Rags Now…

      Like everything from Govt – MSM – Bought off Medical folks – Anyone the GLOBAL NAZI’s can Buy which is fucking Near EVERYONE….self excepted.

      No plans to sell my soul, whatsoever.

  11. .. very old white guy

    Apparently not , the peasants too busy being WOKE to realize they are being screwed , while the elite are busy installing tyranny everywhere you look.

    If the powers that be really wanted to end this mess , which they apparently do not wish to do , it could be resolved by using effective early therapeutic treatment (HCL , Ivermectin etc.) .

  12. I think the long term stat I will look at is the live births year over year. That should make it pretty plain. Possibly “bought” research studies can’t produce extra children at the end of a year.

  13. Whenever I read a medical document which refers to “pregnant persons” I have a lot of trouble taking the content or authors seriously.

    1. Ya, science is taking a backseat to unrelated political matters and that back seat is in a clown car.

  14. This FDA public hearing on the Booster probably didn’t go as expected. In the end they voted 16 -3 against boosters. At 4 hours (yes hours) in there is a segment I listened to and thoroughly enjoyed. First guy up after the break was better reading the slides due to a strong accent but really interesting info about why historically only organisms with high toxicity have needed boosting at about the 10 year mark or after stepping on rusty nails. https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M Next guy up may have been trolling, or was an idiot (Thalidomide was a fiasco for FDA but whatever). Third up an inconvenient truth (VAERS hockey stick) and it just kept going. I do believe fertility was in the line up, I stopped after about 15 minutes. Would just add that keeping people perpetually inflamed with boosters seems like a tried and true safe and effective thingie.

  15. Ontario NDP leader Andrea Horwath released a statement today, that she wants it to be illegal for people to enter a church unless they are fully vaccinated.

    1. Andrea Horwath, yeah.

      What Andrea really wants is for churches to be illegal, and the people who go to them sent to jail. But being a Leftist, she’s to cowardly to admit it.

      And I say that as a man who hasn’t voluntarily gone in a church in 40+ years other than weddings and funerals.

      1. Former Ontario premier Wynne was on CTV this evening, explaining that vaccination passports should be used forever.

  16. Realistically, it’ll be three to four pregnancy terms before any definitive determination can be made. So about three years. If there’s a significant difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated women with fertility and miscarriages, then there will be a lot of angry, heartbroken women. Yet another reason to hold off on vaccinating low risk, prepubescent kids since no one knows what, if any, reproduction effects could occur. Especially since the shot doesn’t prevent infection or transmission of covid.

    1. Gee LC, you mean maybe hold back a bit on the experimental genetic modification treatment? The one that even the guy who invented the technology is a little cautious of?

      But but but isn’t that anti-science and anti-vax talk?

      To be perfectly honest, I’m a fan of the technology. We don’t have many weapons to fight viruses. It would be awesome to be able to pick a flaw in a virus and make a shot for it. Imagine what you could do treating herpes, HIV, Smallpox, the cold, the flu, all that stuff.

      But, and this is the nasty part, they didn’t test this thing much. The Covid-19 shot, nobody knows what it’ll do in three years. Nobody foresaw that it would move from the inoculation site and show up in every organ, including the nerves and brain. Nobody thought the spike proteins would leave the outer coating of the cells producing them and float around the bloodstream. Nobody had any warning that kids would start showing up with pericarditis after taking the shot. Nobody knows what’s coming down the pipe, either.

      So it would have been nice if the authorities had approached this in a reasonable and responsible way, instead of treating it like a football and running for the end-zone too score a touchdown.

      1. I also think that the technology of mRNA holds promise and other gene therapies. But, it does not appear to be fit to task for covid. It simply is not giving any signs of achieving long term immunity like a vaccine should. It’s looking more and more like a treatment that, at best, should have been used on high risk groups only. It is not nearly safe enough or effective enough to continue forcing mass vaccinations, boosters, employment mandates and vaccines passports.

        The abandonment of all other treatment options is unforgivable. The continuation of ignoring treatments after the vaccines are clearly failing is now criminal, imo.

        Frankly, l think our politicians have gone mad with power and greed. I hope citizens, voters and history will judge them harshly. All sewage treatment plants and landfills should be named after our current political leaders.

        1. By the admission of the MRNA companies at the time, the focus of mRNA drug development was switched from therapeutic drugs to vaccines because the therapeutics had too many side effects to get out of animal trials and vaccines only require one or two doses.

          Now the “experts” are pushing boosters and no one is asking the question- how many boosters will it take before a person has received a high enough cumulative dose of mRNA that the incredibly bad side effect profile of the mRNA animal trials starts showing up?

          1. “Now the “experts” are pushing boosters and no one is asking the question- how many boosters will it take before a person has received a high enough cumulative dose of mRNA that the incredibly bad side effect profile of the mRNA animal trials starts showing up?”

            Never, I hope
            Soon, I fear

      2. Phantom

        You still seem to think this is about a Virus..??
        Seriously.?
        A Global phenomena…all 100% in Lockstep
        No Comments FROM ANY Govt source on Vitamin D, B1, C w/Zinc..?
        Full on early Trashing of HCQ & IVMCTN…?
        …..and Full on “NAZI to Jews” style VidVAx COERCION.?

        These EVIL Global ratfucks knew PRECISELY what the mRNA Vaxes will do…they’ve had 22 years to perfect their Bio -Weapon….and it’s working exactly as designed.

        Wake up my son….

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation