A More “Humane” Approach

I’m old enough to remember when putting kids in cages was a bad thing.

The New York Times has a different definition of “humane” than the average person. *

6 Replies to “A More “Humane” Approach”

  1. I’m old enough to remember that only Trump did that. Allegations that Holy Saint Barry did it earlier were, of course, debunked, right?

  2. Don’t think of it as incarceration of minors, think of the closed-circuit TV monitors as a pizzagate Tinder.

  3. It’s almost like all these stupid issues they nailed blumpf on are a little more complicated than crying infront of a fence for tv cameras. How’s the Biden covid plan coming along? How’s his start from scratch vaccine rollout going? No one will ever follow up on that bullshit of course.

  4. They’re not cages any more. They’re “bullpens” … with chain link fencing … like on a baseball field. That’s the ticket, they’re all playing baseball … Jaou Biden style.

  5. Not when they do it, because now it’s all magical, so reality and consequences of their childlike analysis is moot.
    Why govern? Why lead? Let’s “Open Biden” to whatever collectivist concoction they and George Soros can think of.
    https://meaww.com/nancy-pelosi-says-grandkids-utter-magic-words-open-biden-while-playing-conservatives-call-it-creepy
    More riots in the streets? Less police. Energy independence? Cancelled Keystone. Kids in cages? Kids in cargo containers.
    Watch the video; it’s chilling. The capacity of voters to support lie to your face while laughing at you charlatans is tragically epic.
    You can’t crush productivity by seconding liberty and get away with it forever. Government now exists to serve itself.
    Politicians must support citizens interests, not their “party position.” It’s long past the time to ditch brokerage politics.
    Canadians tell us they don’t like negative politics, but watch it sink into that again and again, as adversaries reveal themselves.

Navigation