11 Replies to “When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal”

  2. Mueller said that he had no evidence that Trump DID NOT commit a crime. And I thought, migawd, that’s a variation of the “have you stopped beating your wife” trap.

    Mueller = scumbag.
    He was on the foiled coup team, lets be clear about this.
    He knew it was a scam before he even started.
    And he’s probably scared as well he should be.

  4. Muller should have either found evidence to “convict” or just shut his pie hole. Maybe is not a legal option. Nor is proving a negative. As NMD states, muller is a team player, and that would be the o’butthole team.

    1. First of all … Mueller looks, sounds, and acts like an arrogant, supercilious … bureaucrat. Prattling on about his “judgements”. Take your “judgements” and shove em. You’re an “investigator” … who “found” nothing after milking the taxpayer for two years chasing a FAKE story created entirely from whole cloth by HER. What a putz.

      But what I find particularly annoying is his INCOMPLETE explanation of WHY a sitting president cannot be indicted. He almost derisively said that it was unconstitutional… as if he loathes the document. If he were a man of integrity, he would have EXPLAINED the reason a sitting president cannot be indicted … like Mark Levin has repeated over and over.

      http://hardnoxandfriends.com/2017/06/20/mark-levin-a-sitting-u-s-president-can-not-be-indicted-by-the-justice-department/

      If a sitting president could be indicted … it would be an endless “open season” on the President … you know … kinda like what the Demoncraps have been doing to MY President since BEFORE HE did the impossible … by defeating HER! Nothing but endless lies, threats, and distractions by the Demoncreeps. Our 3-branches of Govt. have devolved into a 3-ring circus. And Mueller simply sneers at the US Constitution.

  5. Mueller, Comey, Obama, Valjar, Brennan, Pelosi. All of them walked away from the truth so long ago, that I don’t think they would recognize it if it landed on their heads like an anvil. They are not ‘amoral’ which is the current popular term. They are immoral. It’s been a successful claw to the top for them. Why would they change? How would it even be possible?

  7. Mueller said that he had no evidence that Trump DID NOT commit a crime.
    Yes, guilty until proven innocent. NOT in America, not even for the most heinous crimes committed in public.
    Let Mueller prove that he has evidence that he DID NOT conspire in a coup, or else send his a** to jail. Convict him by his own standards.

  8. Mueller relied heavily on the concept that “a sitting President cannot be indicted” and he then implied that it’s Congress’s responsibility to impeach Trump. What no one seems to have picked up on is that Mueller could have brought charges against anyone BUT the President if in fact there was evidence of collusion. Does anyone think that if the campaign had colluded with the Russians that it was Donald Trump on his own that was involved??? If there was evidence of collusion Mueller should have charged everyone on Trump’s team that was involved.
    Evidence of Russian meddling is a serious concern, BUT, unless there is evidence that someone from Trump’s team was involved there is NO collusion.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation