Your Moral And Intellectual Superiors

In other words, sent to die.

13 Replies to “Your Moral And Intellectual Superiors”

    1. The fairness doctrine was forced dissemination of liberal talking points. It is, and was, a bad thing.

  1. Her tweets are high on accusations but are low on information.

    “Source tells me…” “…NeverTrumper mags…” “… top Internet company…” “… major newspaper.”

    Who?, who?, who? and who?

    No doubt though, leftards have proven that these kinds of sleazy actions, as my youngest daughter would say, are exactly their ‘jam’. I can only hope Emerald’s source was 100% correct when they alleged “Once this story is out, these people will never recover…”

    Heard that one too many times already.

    1. I stopped reading Weekly Standard, National Rview, etc. when they were PO’d aout ol’ Low Energy Bush not being the candidate.

  2. Tom Fitton, head of the excellent “Judicial Watch” summarizes what goes on by tweeting this out the day of the synagogue shooting:

    Tom Fitton‏Verified account

    ‘The Left spent the week using the mail bomb crimes as a pretext to attack the First Amendment. Today, the terrible Pittsburgh murders to go after the Second Amendment.’

  3. Why would a “neverTrump” magazine ask for money to do what they want to do naturally. I can see payments as being a reward for being true to their beliefs, but I don’t see payments being used as encouragement.

    1. Pretty simple, really. One of the ways the Left controls the narrative is to name Conservatives. Hence, we get Jen Rubin at the Washington Post (who calls her a Conservative). We get interviews on CNN where someone like Bill Kristol shows up and they call him a Conservative.

      What they are essentially doing is cherry picking individuals who they know will promote their agenda, then they portray it as how all Conservatives should think, and in some cases they try to bring across that all “good” Conservatives DO think that way. Only the xenophobic think otherwise. The Rubins and Kristols are more than happy to oblige provided they are compensated.

      On this specific issue, The Weekly Standard was more than happy to support the censorship of Conservative views by Facebook and Twitter simply because they think they will be “the last man standing” and that’s good for business (since they’ve lost a HUGE portion of their readership). A New York Times article a little over a month ago confirmed outright that these Nevertrumpers are getting paid out of the Left’s coffers.

      The last thing the Left wants is a unified Right. That’s why the Kavanaugh fiasco was so damaging. For a fraction of a second there, the Right was unified….all except for Bill Kristol (who was arguing rather stringently that Kavanaugh should have been pulled from the nomination). How much do you think he got for pushing that opinion? Who do you think paid him to do it?

      1. Exactly. I think Kristol has gone over to the dark side.

        This does not in the least surprise me about the Weekly Standard and Bill Kristol as they have been never Trumpers right from the get go, but, I had not heard about the National Review.

        1. I heard Andrew McCarthy, of National Review last night (Lou Dobbs, if I recall) opining on PDJT’s EXECUTIVE ORDER to suspend birthright citizenship. and not surprisingly … he said that ONLY CONGRESS and a CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION could do such a thing. Not surprisingly. At all. I paused the TV (as I am want to do) and predicted what he would say about it … and was 100% correct. Still a GOPe, globalist, cheap-labor, Chamber of Commerce guy. Too bad, because I usually agree with 90% of what he says … but he just cannot bring himself to align with Trump … or … THE PEOPLE. I have little use for the … TRUE conservatives. They can all hang themselves with a necktie on a doorknob (Robin Williams style) for all I care.

          What’ya think about THAT, Gord Tulk ?

Navigation