35 Replies to “Reader Tips”

  1. nothing beats climate change for divisiveness.
    “It’s more politically polarizing than abortion,” says Anthony Leiserowitz, director of the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. “It’s more politically polarizing than gay marriage.”
    Leiserowitz says 17 percent of Americans, the fastest-growing group, are alarmed by climate change and want action now, based on surveys by Yale and George Mason University.
    Another 28 percent are concerned, thinking it’s a man-made threat, but somewhat distant in time and place. Twenty-seven percent are cautious, still on the fence, and 11 percent are doubtful. An often-vocal 10 percent are dismissive, rejecting the concept of warming and the science. And about 7 percent are disengaged, not even paying attention because they’ve got more pressing needs.
    http://bigstory.ap.org/ce7583314867404485a310255546f647

  2. “Airy-fairy platitudes no deterrent to terrorism”- Mark Bonoski, Calgary Sun,
    http://www.calgarysun.com/2016/08/15/airy-fairy-platitudes-no-deterrent-to-terrorism?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=recommend-button&utm_campaign=Airy-fairy%20platitudes%20no%20deterrent%20to%20terrorism
    ——————————————————————————-
    Talk about a scary headline.
    More so for the taxi driver, in small town Ontario, almost blown up by a convicted jihadi. For those so convicted should they be sentenced:
    A). To wear an ankle bracelet for a few months?
    and
    B). Be subject to airy-fairy platitudes telling them not to believe what they read?
    or
    C). Face a firing squad?
    Give reasons for your answer.

  3. A widely-used class of insecticides called neonicotinoids has contributed to the large-scale and long-term decline of wild bees, according to research unveiled Tuesday.
    A study covered 62 species from 1994 to 2011, examining the impact of exposure to the pesticide…
    The results also bolster small-scale and short-term studies that have previously fingered neonics as a culprit in bee decline, especially species bred for pollination and honey production.
    Unlike contact pesticides — which remain on the surface of foliage — neonicotinoids are absorbed by the plant from the seed phase and transported to leaves, flowers, roots and stems. They have been widely used over the last 20 years, and were designed to control sap-feeding insects such as aphids and root-feeding grubs…
    Previous studies have found neonicotinoids can cause bees to become disorientated such that they cannot find their way back to the hive, and lower their resistance to disease. Recent experiments showed that the insecticides also diminish the viability of bee sperm…
    Neonics are deemed to be only one of several causes for the dramatic decline in bee colonies, especially in Europe and the United States. “It is unlikely that they are acting in isolation,” “Habitat loss and fragmentation, pathogens, climate change and other insecticides” are other likely factors…
    Bees of all kinds account for an estimated 80 percent of plant pollination by insects.
    The scientists involved in the wild bee study caution against “simplistic solutions” to the problems of pollinators. They say a “holistic” approach to the use of insecticides must be taken and they are lukewarm about the idea of banning chemicals.
    “When you grow oilseed rape you can’t do it without pesticides, there’s an underlying reality to this,” said Dr Woodcock.
    “Just because you say ‘don’t use neonicotinoids anymore’, the likelihood is that another pesticide is going to have to be used to compensate for that, that is going to have impacts on runoffs into waterways and on other species that you can control for.”
    “It needs to be taken in a very holistic perspective, you can’t just say as long as we can save the bees everything else can go to hell, that’s not where you want to be at.”
    http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37089385

  4. “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” — H. L. Mencken

  5. We reject the bigotry of Hillary Clinton, which panders to, and talks down to communities of color and sees them only as votes — that’s all they care about — not as individual human beings worthy of a better future. They have taken advantage. She doesn’t care at all about the hurting people of this country.
    “It’s time for rule by the people, not rule for the special interest, which we have right now,” he stated. “I’m fighting for you” and for “peaceful regime change in our own country.”
    A snippet of Trumps speech in Milwaukee.
    Video here.

  6. Ontario in the hands of a majority and arrogant government led by Madam Wynne and her incompetents is the worst in our history. She poo poos any form of criticism, even from the Auditor General which is typical of a know-it-all arrogant prig with too much power. We’ve heard the saying power corrupts, it’s hard to recognize what corruption is any more, anything goes. Using money she doesn’t have for self serving ads to push her green agenda then saying it’s informing the people. Yes, informing the people what she is doing and no one can stop her. Bully. It’s a great time to leave Ontario…oh wait…there’s no escape, we have incompetent Liberals with a majority running the country…trapped.

  7. Ah, yes….. H. L. Mencken, one of my favourite curmudgeons. Here’s a gem from Ambrose Bierce, another gadfly I like:
    “Politics, n. A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage.”
    And another one:
    “Politician, n. An eel in the fundamental mud upon which the superstructure of organized society is reared. When he wriggles he mistakes the agitation of his tail for the trembling of the edifice. As compared with the statesman, he suffers the disadvantage of being alive.”
    Bierce’s book “The Devil’s Dictionary” is filled with similarly barbed comments.

  8. Hummmmmm….0620 MDT, and the only two “tips” that are not full of BS are Liz J and G. Must have been a bad day yesterday.

  9. To B (no, not Shakespearean) You’re warning us about the coming Silent Spring?
    What could possibly go wrong?

  10. Wonder if the residents of Ontario realize they are paying the highest electricity prices in North America while generating the cheapest electricity in decades?

  11. Here, http://globalnews.ca/national/program/global-national/ @22:40 minute mark is piece on AGW. It is a massive full frontal attack propaganda piece. Talking about this year being the hottest.
    One has to ask, does 8 months make a year?
    A guy that calls himself “scientist” sez, the planet is on fire.
    Yeah.
    The news reader is well known for near fainting when talking about the airhead in Ottawa.
    The propaganda piece is a full force ahead without one question, an ounce of skepticism. Noting will stop the global from making sure those that watch don’t know.
    Here is another view on the weather, http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/17/farmers-almanac-forecasts-ice-cold-winter-in-2016/ “Farmers’ Almanac Crushes Dreams Of Global Warming Zealots With ‘ICE COLD WINTER’ Forecast”.
    If for no other reason the global could introduce another view, though, that would definitely be too much to ask.
    Growing up in a socialist country run by communists, this kind of propaganda is familiar, interesting part is that the population in general did not believe any of it.
    Standard practice was, they lie, we don’t believe them.
    If the real journalists wanted the plebeians to know, they wrote with meaning between the lines, the population knew exactly what was going on.
    It is interesting that those real scientists from private sector that don’t agree are put down because they are paid as part of their job by companies they work for.
    As opposed to those “scientists” that work for government and support propaganda to remain in their well paid jobs courtesy of the taxpayer
    By the way are there any government scientists that came up with anything scientific?
    Just askin’

  12. Another leftard hypocrite and his “foundation” slush fund
    ———————————————–
    …the [Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation] therefore is not required to file itemized public disclosures about its own revenue, expenditures and disbursements.
    Despite repeated efforts, DiCaprio, 41, the LDF and the CCF all declined to fully answer fundamental questions related to transparency and accountability of the foundation
    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/leonardo-dicaprio-malaysian-money-scandal-920199

  13. The day the USSR and ideology died, but not history. Somebody called a coup but nobody came. Remember the media’s “right wing communists?”
    “On Aug. 19, 1991, a group of eight senior hard-line Communist leaders, including the KGB chairman, had seized power from Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev, declaring that Gorbachev was unable to continue as head of the party due to illness.”
    In fact, Gorbachev was under arrest and the “Gang of Eight” intended to roll back his reformist policies of glasnost and perestroika, which they believed had set the Soviet Union on a path of disaster … Muscovites turned out to defend the spirit of democracy that Gorbachev had unleashed, and many Soviet officers defied their orders and sided with the people, ensuring that that the plotters failed.”
    Under Putin, the Russian political system has taken a clear turn back toward authoritarian rule. He also has tried to restore elements of the old empire, by recentralizing power, restoring control over the media, rebuilding the military and reclaiming a global role. Those who remember the August 1991 crisis, however, say the totalitarian state of old is gone for good.”
    “The current political regime is repressive, but freedom is not only about voting for political parties,” said Ragozin, now a freelance journalist. “It’s about being able to choose your lifestyle, about being able to travel, choose your profession. That was largely absent in the Soviet Union, which was a truly totalitarian state.” They moved away from totalitarianism, we move towards it; so very sad for freedom & prosperity.
    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_RUSSIA_COUP_ANNIVERSARY?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-08-17-05-39-06

  14. It’s so hard to know what to believe these days. It’s an article in the newspaper written by a “science” writer, summarizing a STATISTICAL study done by some people I’ve never heard of ….. are they statisticians or are they bee “experts”?
    No matter. They have found a mathematical correlation between wild bee populations and use of neonicotinoids used in growing canola in GB (or is it with increased acreage?) ……. but then maybe smaller bee populations also correlates with rising CO2 levels. Has anyone checked this possible relationship, I mean apparently wild bee populations are decreasing (is this even true?) and CO2 levels are increasing. That’s what correlation does. It correlates but doesn’t really establish a cause/effect.
    The “scientists” have done it to themselves, with the help of “science writers”. No one knows what to believe anymore.

  15. Your Moral and Intellectual Superiors
    ————————————-
    The [Milwaukee shooting] victim’s sister, Sherelle Smith, delivered a disturbing message to the media, encouraging the rioters to burn down the suburbs instead.
    But when CNN reported Smith’s message, they conveniently left out the most shocking part of it, both on their website and on air.
    http://www.redstate.com/saragonzales/2016/08/16/cnn-caught-editing-milwaukee-shooting-victims-sisters-statement-remove-violent-parts/

  16. Exactly. These people have an agenda as did the DDT ban crowd.
    We picked up some honey from one of local honey producers near our home just north Saskatoon. He has been in business for over thirty years and says that overall the bees are doing just fine. In total there are more hives around than ever.
    Btw, he has a supply contract with Bee Maid and told us that Bee Maid is 100% Canadian honey and there is no foreign honey (from China or elsewhere) mixed in.

Navigation