5 Replies to “Yes, it is that bad.”

  1. AOSHQ was saying this is even bad for relatives of fed employees. So that would mean me as my bro has some serious security clearances. Oh wellz, at least my Dad got to kill some Chicoms in Korea back in 51, so on balance my family is still on the winning end of this deal. FU China.

  2. It’s not problem because the preezy of united steezy is on it. Well actually he’s just waiting to hear about it in the newspaper and he’ll be madder than hell when he does.

  3. I knew all these bureaucrats could be targeted by Chinese agents when I first read of this. Then I said to myself, “What the hey! they’re(the bureaucrats) all commies on the make anyway and why is every western government letting the Chinese flood our countries for if not to let in agents to undermine our society in the first place?”
    Seriously, there were articles about Obama hanging Christmas tree ornaments with images of Chairman Mao on them back in 2009.
    bfd he isn’t called ObaMao for nothing

  4. Read those forms.
    If you would report such intimate details on yourself, do you have any self respect, personal integrity worth mentioning?
    The only thing I see here is great;” Fire them all” as these “public servants” are now all security hazards to the State.
    Like they have always been, spineless malleable personalities who will do anything to slurp at the public trough.
    Any such persons are a hazard to employ look to your national DEBT, term limits on civil service are required… for the safety of the nation.
    No employment longer that 5 years total lifetime, no right to vote while on taxpayers dime.
    Sure this week it is the Chinese Agencies shopping for minions, but these are perfect minions, they do not have a preferred master, excepting the taxpaying citizens who they openly loath and refuse to serve under any conditions.

Navigation