Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
One step removed from Piss Christ.
Renaissance coward picking on babies, famous dead artists and the Mother of Christ.
Oh, in fairness, there are some horrible-looking babies from renaissance and medieval paintings. Wizened, unnatural creatures.
John Lewis – is it only blasphemy if the babies are meant to be Jesus? Is any negative criticism of a painting blasphemous if the subject matter of the painting is ostensibly religious?
Renaissance coward picking on babies, famous dead artists and the Mother of Christ.
Babies were painted to be little adults. Hell one of them looked like they had a 6 o’clock shadow.
Honestly they do look ugly.
What about no.5? That herd of naked six-month-olds(?) by Titian. Normally good stuff, Titian, but that’s just terrible. One of them is firing into the baby-crowd, and another is climbing an effing tree like a lemur, left-hand corner. Two of them are making out; I know it’s “The Worship of Venus”, but that’s still just not right.
Renaissance man
had no tan.
The only outrage here is that of the crappy artists. I guess they were present in the renaissance as well.
I apologize for the double post.
Black Mamba – rightly or wrongly, I had the impression that the comments were not simply an attempt to point out poor painting techniques, but also an attempt to mock the Madonna and child. The exception being the “Worship of Venus” which I agree is especially disturbing.
It’s interesting that the children were painted to look like miniature adults given that’s exactly what the prevailing belief was at the time in respect to children. Our current attitudes about children and childhood is a fairly recent/modern phenomena.
Be aware that artists of the time mostly painted a portrait of a sitting subject, or used sitting models for scenes. Babies, being what they are, would not sit still for such an endeavor, forcing the artist to improvise. Hence the results you see.
If Renaissance artists needed to know what a baby looks like, they should have, you know, gone out and looked at one.