Down with context

Get that little weirdo:

“(Danish filmmaker) Lars von Trier facing (French) charges for Hitler rant…”

Danish police have charged Director Lars von Trier for comments he made about Hitler and Nazism…”

Good. It’s time to put a stop, once and for all, to all this ‘joking around’ crap. Politically incorrect quips, mischievous little provocations, winking jibes, black humour, Scandinavian deadpan, negative capability, irony – these things should be treated as criminal matters.
Let literal-mindedness reign.

12 Replies to “Down with context”

  1. Ok, so he had a wee bit (tiny) of sympathy for someone who’s been dead 66 years. Big hairy deal. His other sin was to say Jews were a pain in the ass. Millions of Muslims say that every day without much controversy.Jews say the same thing about Muslims.
    His real crime ( as the courts will probably show)was being Western/European caucasian instead of a minority group.
    Stalin was a far greater tyrant and butcher than Hitler and what the Japanese did to POW’s and conquered subjects during the war also equals a 10 on the savagery scale. The difference between the guilt trips is fading with each generation but we spend untold millions to make sure “never again” remains fresh. Israel will remain our friend and Ally by default since everyone else in that part of the world hates the Christian Infidels. Threatning anyone who has even a tiny slur against the Jews just shows that political correctness has completely run amuck and will cost far more friends than it makes.
    The threshhold for insults by caucasians could be raised by a couple notches for everyones benefit. Perhaps then, such simple comments would not wind up in the newspapers or the courts.

  2. Kirsten looked pretty uncomfortable, and pretty quickly after his comment.
    The problem with not taking any action is that the “sympathy” would grow to be becoming more mainstream and acceptable. Which in a lot of ways already is.
    Not quite sure of the complete politics of Cannes, but to be honest this surprises me to hear this. I would have assumed that these comments at this event wouldn’t be taken so seriously.
    Btw, many great films that wouldn’t hit the theaters are only brought to the forefront due to the festival. So all in all, I am happy that they took the stance that they did.

  3. Free speech means having to tolerate idiots speaking ridiculous stupid things.
    Anything less than free speech, and I have seen it become more and more controlled during my short 56 years, is fascism.
    And here’s the kicker. When the speech of idiots is suppressed, they gain credibility. This is because rather than hear the idiocy of their words, the people see the idiots as martyrs.

  4. I don’t think I can really stand Lars von Trier, but I will die (I guess) for his right to be the pretentious, free-speeking doucheb@g that he is.
    (Futhermore, nothing he said was remotely pro-Nazi in any reasonable sense of the expression, based on what I just read. But even if it had been…)

  5. @deadwood
    If we actually had free speech than I would agree with you, but at the present moment there is a filter, and it isn’t equal and thus the game must be played.

  6. and hitler has been proven to 90% degree or better to have a jooish linage, so if’n you dis hitler are you anti semetic????

  7. What I find bizarre is that to express intolerance to intolerance is to invite accusations of “nazi”, facism etc….by the real fascists.
    But then with a bit of knowledge/understanding of the fascist’s modus operendi it is not bizarre at all but to be expected.

  8. So Muslims in their mist can spew and promote death to Jews that would surpass even the Nazis, and that is ignored. The absence of good judgement and common sense.

  9. Good. It’s about time to prosecute all those leftards who kept referring to W as “Bushitler”.
    Let them rot in jail
    Oh, wait…
    mhb23re

  10. I have no interest in Naziism. I do however fear those who would deny Nazis and others the right to speak.

  11. “Free speech means having to tolerate idiots speaking ridiculous stupid things.”
    Not quite; free speech means being able to call a stupid son-of-a-bitch a stupid son-of-a-bitch when he or she says something stupid. However, it must be reciprocal, unless the son-of-bitches are socialists. They deserve the stocks.
    Cheers

  12. There should be no topic that is off limit for discussion, positive or negative. Blacks can call each other niger but whites can not. Blacks can also call whites whatever they feel like and never look over their shoulder for the HRC’s.
    Indians can insult whites and lay on supposed guilt trips without reproach and insulting anything Jewish or gay or female can put you in a negative spotlight that could cost you your job or put you in front of a unelected, unaccountable tribunal with the power to make your life miserable. But only if you are white. If you happen to be staight middle class caucasion male you probably know that you are the only group that is monitored constantly for the crime of hurting someone elses feelings. To the best of my knowledge no minority person has ever been hauled in front of any HRC for any reason.
    The backlash will be inevitable unless the Government sees the common sense approach to start treating ALL their citizens under the same rules. The best way of dealing with the whole lopsided situation is to shut off funding to all HRC’s. Hurt feelings should never be a issue and there are real courts for real crimes.

Navigation