The Harper government is refusing to join the United States in calling for a return to 1967 borders as a starting point for Mideast peace, a position that has drawn sharp criticism from Canada’s staunch ally Israel.
As usual, the best part of the Globe article is in the comments. Surely, there is some type of opportunity just waiting to be exploited with so many leftist anti-Semites gathering in one place?
h/t Revnant Dream
Amazing how the mop and pail can give the impression in the first paragraph that Israel does not agree with our support of their utterly sane position.
I won’t even clean catfish on this disgusting rag.
Go Prime Minister Steve!
Go Israel!
Here’s a snippet from a comment on the G&M story at 3:22pm:
“Even a majority of Israelis support the Obama admin’s position, and a majority of their elected officials.”
There’s not one thing true about this statement but I have little doubt that it passes for intelligent thought amongst Canadian leftard ignoramuses.
If anyone needs a feel for what the term “full retard” means just read some of the comments.
wow, but the good part is we are in for a full 4.5 years of this, with no worries about getting coalitioned into another election.
It does make for entertaining reading.
Everytime I read a comments section like that one, I am reminded that it has always been the left that has had issues with the Jews.
Tossing them under buses, into gulags, ovens….etc.
I did leave a comment, but positives to the news were few and far between.
“The Pali’s could have agreed to a peaceful partition into a 2 state situation in ’48, it was part of the UN plan.
Bad decision on the part of their leaders at the time to believe they could “drive the Jews into the sea”, and all the rest since is window dressing.
When the Germans lost WW2, and had their borders redesigned, and their ethnic population expelled from various bordering countries and returned to Germany proper, they absorbed them and moved forward.
When the Pali’s and the rest of the Arab world failed to eradicate Israel in ’48, instead of admitting defeat and absorbing those displaced by the fighting, they’ve chosen to keep them disenfranchised, and refuse to recognize Israel’s right to exist.
When the neighbouring Arab nations lost again in ’56, ’67 and ’73, Israel staked a claim to a defensible border, and no further. Though they certainly could have taken large portions of Egypt, Jordan and Syria under their control, had they chosen too.
Wake up, the saddest part of all this is that a peaceful partition in ’48 could have been the start of a real change in world realpolitik, but like India/Pakistan, tribal identification overcame rational thought.”
…dust in the wind, as the snark against anything Harper or pro Israel is strong.
The Globe & Mail only speak for themselves these days. Its just going to get worse for them as Canadians wise up to the rape of this Nation & its forced tribialization.
The implicat Anti-Semitism. The NYTimes of Canada.
Only the true believers can believe the drivel they write.
Bravo MR. PM Harper for standing up to be counted when it means something.
No shortage of stupids in this Country considering we now have the internet to counter the lies of the left. AtlanticJim is right. To bad so many people including Jewish people can’t see it.
JMO
It isn’t that simple. I think one has to consider some immutable facts.
First – the Israeli people and the Palestinian people exist. No amount of ‘send them away’ will get rid of either people – as a people. Both sides have at various times wished and encouraged the other to: leave, go away, disappear into another country etc. It’s not going to happen.
Second – Israel has no intention of giving up control of the W Bank. This is not for defense purposes but for the arable land, for the settlement land and these settlements are up to almost half a million now.. and…for the aquifers.
So – any talk about ‘giving up the land in return for whatever..is just that. Talk. Empty.
Third – Israel won’t annex the W Bank because to do so would mean giving citizenship to its Palestinian occupants. They are, unfortunately, the ‘wrong religion’ and Israel won’t give them Israeli citizenship.
So- the dilemma remains. Two populations each unable and unwilling to merge with the other. Or to disappear into the night. One land base desired by both. What to do?
You can claim the other (and both sides make these claims) is antagonistic, out to destroy the people…and show factual evidence of such hostility…and continue the occupation and the settling of the land etc.
But, fourth point, this is reaching a critical threshold. This threshold is the so-called Arab Spring, a movement towards democracy, difficult and rocky as it is, which is due to the explosive increase in ME population of the last 40 years. This population has moved beyond the economic capacity of the old dictatorial two-class structures of the Islamic nations..and they must move into private enterprise capitalism. And democracy.
This means that the old Islamic hostility to a Palestinian state – and it WAS hostility for they couldn’t afford to have Palestine as a democracy while their own peoples were deprived of such freedoms..well, this era is over. Palestine can become a democracy.
But- where? Since Israel won’t give up the W Bank, then, the only suggestive solution I can come up with is a kind of single state made up of a federation of two states: Israel and Palestine. Each deals with their own citizenship, education, health etc etc…while they develop a federal govt with equal representation that deals with allocation of shared resources, currency, etc. That is, they ECONOMICALLY merge and SOCIALLY remain separate.
Will it work? Frankly, I think it would. I can think of no other option. Israel can’t continue to occupy the W Bank and since it won’t annex it and its population..then..what’s the solution?
An aging rock star schools Obama!
hehe I enjoyed that Robert.
For those without the stomach to read the comments, I did. Read 4 pages and not a single one was pro Israel. Just could not continue reading the other 1100. Got the picture so to speak.
A great deal of hatred for Stephen Harper too.
O’mediagenic “”black puppet””.
“It came from West, a mediagenic, leftist black academic.”
…-
“Why West´s Slur of President Obama Got a Headline”
“Princeton University professor Cornell West´s silly, shoot-from the lip slur of President Obama as a black puppet predictably got the headline that he knew it would for two reasons. The first is that the slur came not from the professional Obama baiters, Sarah Palin, Limbaugh, and Michelle Bachman, Tea Party leaders and activists, the shrill pack of rightwing talk show jocks, bloggers and websites. It came from West, a mediagenic, leftist black academic. Even that might not have drawn mention since West has repeatedly hectored, harangued, and tweaked Obama as a sell-out to corporate interests and for allegedly saying and doing nothing to alleviate black suffering. The strong language West used calling Obama a “black puppet” guaranteed the momentary tantalizing headline.
But West´s slur got traction for another reason. It came close on the heels of a recent Gallup poll that showed that Obama´s approval rating had taken a dip among blacks.”
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/235739
ET writes, “But, fourth point, this is reaching a critical threshold. This threshold is the so-called Arab Spring, a movement towards democracy, difficult and rocky as it is, which is due to the explosive increase in ME population of the last 40 years.” Maybe.
However, I recently heard a talk by an American political/security insider, who said that the “so-called Arab Spring”—good term, ET—isn’t likely to work out well for the West or Israel. The Arab uprisings have everything to do with the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), achieving power all over the ME. Israel? What could the MB’s plan possibly be?
“Spring” doesn’t begin to describe it. Neither does “democracy”: once the MB’s in charge, free votes will be a thing of the past.
I’m very proud that PMSH understands the stakes here and is standing tall with Israel.
Canada has supported US policy where it is supportable, and has finessed where it was not –
until now, where finessing is not possible. Congratulations to PMSH for his balls.
BTW there is no peace in the Middle East and there will be none.
Next Act: nuclear Iran takes centre stage.
Canada needs nuclear weapons. As one of the participants in the Manhattan Project we could have had them by 1950. We need them NOW ASAP.
“A nuke a day keeps Barack at bay”.
I too read a few pages of comments and stopped just prior to becoming ill. I’ll give the G&M this, they sure know how to gather in all the village idiots.
lookout – I disagree that the ‘arab spring’ uprisings are about the Muslim Brotherhood coming to power. The people in the ME are not going to exchange one dictatorial regime for another.
And, Islamic fundamentalism is a two-tiered societal structure, made up of the Guardian-Rulers and the Ruled. Exactly like the dictator regimes of the ME. This infrastructure is unable to engender what is economically necessary in the ME; namely, a private middle class economy made up of small to medium size businesses – owned by individuals.
This transformation from a centralist statist economic mode, based on a state monopoly of one resource (oil, Suez tolls) is necessary because of the massive population increase in the ME – beyond the economic capacity of a state single-resource economy. And, an economic middle class must have political power; namely, democracy.
Therefore, I disagree, the MB will not come to power in the ME – because it economically cannot develop that vital middle class economy.
Thanks Robert. Nice rant by Gene Simmons. “Obama has no effing idea” pretty well sums things up.
ET, you may be correct. However, the inside operative I mentioned, who’s spent decades in the ME and has intelligence not available to the rest of us, said differently. This person also said that Obama is, if not actually a Muslim, certainly aiding and abetting the Muslim cause in the ME. My instinct—and what I can see/hear with my own eyes/ears—persuades me to agree with this expert.
That said: I hope you’re right and I’m wrong.
Perhaps the CJC would like to explain why they never take issue with the anti-semitic comments at CBC and the Gob? Funny I don’t see the champions of Secion 13 holding the anti-semites at those sites’ accountable, perhaps they like trolling unknown sites looking for neo-nazis why bother with concensus media?
“For those without the stomach to read the comments, I did. Read 4 pages and not a single one was pro Israel. Just could not continue reading the other 1100. Got the picture so to speak.
A great deal of hatred for Stephen Harper too.
Posted by: RCGZ at May 21, 2011 5:22 PM
Thank you for saving my sanity, RCGZ!!! I got through the first TWO comments only,let alone two pages. Who owns this rag again??
Israel’s borders taste O’good.
O’AlMoh recommends: Have a heapin’ helpin’.
H/T Liberal MP Hezbollah Coderre.
…-
“Because as everybody knows, they think the biggest problem in the Middle East today is Israel’s borders.”
“The biggest priority of the age is to tame Israel and build windmills all over the landscape. Do you disagree? Well you don’t count.”
“Strictly From Hunger”
http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2011/05/21/strictly-from-hunger/#comments
“…so-called Arab Spring, a movement towards democracy”.
I wonder what you would call a democratic movement that the majority would wish to “wipe Israel off the map” and Christians living within the country be persecuted to invisibility, conversion or death?
It’s funny that since CNN turned off the cameras and packed their bags & hair gel, leaving Egypt to their new democratic dark ages, we hear very little about the atrocities against the remaining Christians in that country. A little Google searching gives a peek into the democratic hell many are now living under.
Won’t it be nice when we can also experience our own democratic Islamic Spring in the west in years to come?
Some time back, a Palestinian co-worker was starting to whine about Israel and the plight of the Palestinian people. So I asked him if the Jewish God is the same God of the Muslims. Yes was the reply. Then I said if the one and same God decreed that Israel is for His people, the Jews, way before Mohammad was a glean in his great great great great great grandfather’s eye, then who is to argue with God? No reply.
I decided to keep reading until I found a pro Israel/ harper message. I found the first 190 comments into the 1200 comment thread:
The muslim Arab states have been calling for the total eradication of Israel. And you limp wristers don’t expect them to fight? Idiots!
Israel, NUKE Iran, NOW, before they develop their own nuclear weapons and use them on you! Make no bones about it, they will if they can! Take out Iran, and you won’t have to worry about the other mid east Countries.
All the rest approximate this:
Yet again Harper’s government shows itself farther to the right than just about any other Western nation. The U.K. (with a Conservative government, we should note), Germany, France, Poland… etc. all support the Obama Plan for returning to pre-1967 borders with suitable “swaps” of other tracts of land.
But not this embarrassment of a government here in Canada.
How does this happen? Again! We have a government that only 40 percent of the population supports and agrees with on most issues.
ET writes,
“…what’s the solution?”
The same as most everywhere on the planet. Declare independence.
The Palies will never do that because such threatens their lucrative status as refugees, and, most of all, they would have to declare their intended borders.
Not going to happen.
Frankly, your comments were general blame Israel/West only type, but more tempered than most. Palestinians have options. Obama’s mistake was to make it sound like land exchage can be done without “right of return” settlement also. Big mistake, even if he did not know it.
Also, with the Arab Spring, the scary reality is coming to the diplo elites in the west, and the lefties: The Arab revolutionaries don’t care about the Palestinians. That’s why the diplos lie and talk about Israel betta’ do sumpthin’ now stuff.
ET
As usual you got ME wrong.
Islamic fundamentalim is not a two-tiered societal structure. Further, Guardianship of Jurists exist only in Shia Islam, it has nothing to do with Sunni Islam.
State monopoly of resources is important only in countries which have the natural resources. Only Libya has a lot of oil, Egypt’ and Tunisia’ primary resource is tourism.
Rule of fundamentalist MB does not preclude middle class from having the power in their countries, because MB does consist of the middle class Egyptians who are, in their majority, fundamentalist.
And lastly it is not certain that Arab spring will result in democratic governments, Iranian democratic uprising against the shah in Iran resulted in theocratic government there.
ET, I hope you’re right about the immanence of democracy, but I can’t see it. Islamic cultures don’t do democrcy. As I see it, in secular states such as Turkey there is less freedom to practise strict Islam than in Canada.
Without democracy, the surrounding countries will remain hostile to Israel.
I just sent Prime Minister Harper a note in support of his position to side with Israel and to continue opposing the U.S. President’s unfortunate views.
Wouldn’t hurt to also send the Prime Minister a note of your support as well.
http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/contact.asp?featureId=10
I keep seeing statements like this one below in the Grope and Flail in virtually every article I’ve read since Obama said the US position is now that Israel should agree to go back to 1967 line (thought the US Senate got to vote on foreign policy stuff like that??).
“Israel defeated Arab nations in 1967, seizing Gaza, Old Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Golan Heights.”.
I haven’t read an article yet that gave the context of who attacked who which as per my suggested edit as follows;
“The attempted invasion and destruction of the State of Israel by it’s Muslim neighbours Egypt, Syria and Jordan in 1967 forced Israel to defend itself and push the invaders back resulting in Isreal occupying the strategic ground in Gaza, the West Bank, and, especially the Golan Heights thereby giving Israel a significantly more defensible postion in the event its Muslim neighbours attempt any future invasions.”.
Keep it up Steve!
I once suggested to a couple baptist ministers that there is a scenario whereby every Jew that died in the holacaust was made a proposition by God before they were born; do you give up your life in that terrible stage of Jewish history so that the aftermath is a Jewish state? free to decide, but if so much as one of you declines, so much for that outcome. p.s. do you want to be the spoiler?
so what do we have now 63 years later and still going strong? there is an article in the ‘leftist’ Foreign Policy current issue about the huge benefits realized by the alliance of Israel and the U.S.
maybe obama is like dubya and ‘doesn’t read newspapers [and such]’
Canada needs nuclear weapons. As one of the participants in the Manhattan Project we could have had them by 1950. We need them NOW ASAP.”
gee, I wonder if your ‘merican ‘allies’ would try to snatch our oil and water resources like they already have plans tucked away in a washington vault to do if it comes to that, if we had some nukes likewise tucked away in a secret spot.
I for one wouldn’t hesitate to push the button to wipe out, oh, say chicago (get the connection?).
ping >
Aw come on now ping, everyone knows the American’s view Canadians as nice people. And we in turn know that American’s are all Ozzy & Harriet, Green Acers and Father Knows Best. Would John Wayne send in the 7th Calvary on nice people and “pop a cap in their ass”? Hell no.
That’s why Obamba is a Nobel Peace Prize winner.
He’s expanding the war into Pakistan & North Africa because “they ain’t nice people” like Canadians who smile lots, eat granola for breakfast and subsidize their natural resources through free trade and American corporate conglomeration.
We don’t need no stinkin nukes, we just need lots of weed and big smiles. John Wayne will always be saddled up to ride to our rescue should the need arise. 🙂
There is nothing wrong with the 1967 borders; as long as they are the December 31, 1967 (ie AFTER the Six Day War) borders. In this case Egypt must hand over big whacks of the Sinai to Isreal.
I am NOT a fan of Gene, nor is Kiss music for me, even though I live, love Rock and roll. For a fifty plus I can hold my own.
But I have to give the man credit, Gene has it to a TEE.
The high school debating champion in chief, has NOT a F^%king clue! I laugh, along withn the rest of the thinking world, whenever he approaches a microphone.
World affairs should not be addressed from a mirror mirror perspective.
The next election can’t come soon enough. He’ll crash on his own, no bullet required.
well, ella, ‘as usual’, you and I will continue to disagree. I stand by all my points. Just because you tell me that I’ve ‘got it all wrong’ doesn’t mean that this is indeed the case.
Islamic fundamentalism, like any fundamentalist societal system, is two-tiered, with a small set who have authority and the rest of the population who lack that authority. Nothing to do with Shia or Sunni, but with the societal system. Remember, Islam is not so much a religion as it is a political and societal system.
State monopoly of the economy refers to, not only oil, but Suez tolls and tourism – and to control of all sources of revenue. This means that the economy lacks a middle class economy which can produce revenue from private small and medium businesses.
No, a bureaucracy of people employed by the govt is not a middle class; it’s a set of adjuncts to the elite set of Rulers. What I mean by a middle class economy is a set of the population engaged in private enterprise. Small and medium businesses owned by them. Not by the government. This lack of private capitalism is a major problem in the ME. There is no middle class economy.
No, the majority of people in Egypt are not fundamentalist. [And don’t try to bring up that flawed PEW poll as ‘evidence’]. The Iranian ‘revolution’ was decades ago and is an invalid comparison to what is going on now.
You are ignoring the realities of massive population growth in the last 3-4 decades, which has rendered the old statist economies in the ME unable to deal with this population’s needs.
Therefore, I reject your comments.
Jack – I think your ‘declare independence’ an illogical answer. Independence from what? And with what? They have no land base! They’ve already declared their borders. And your assumption that they want the US money more than they want control over their own lives is just you opinion. I reject it.
The ‘Arab revolutionaries’ are not fighting for or about Palestine. Bringing up Israel-Palestine is a red herring. The rebels are fighting for freedom – both political and economic – within their own nations.
Knight 99 – yes, I suggest that the Islamic nations will move into democracy. They have no choice because they must move into private market capitalism made up of small/medium business rather than a statist socialist economic mode. And democracy is the political mode that is linked to private market capitalism.
As for tolerance of minorities, that has less to do with democracy and more to do with cultural change, economic security and education. Takes time to undo centuries of considering other peoples as ‘Other’. Even though nations in the West were democracies, it took time for blacks/whites to collaborate in the US, for women to get the vote in many nations, for different views of Christianity to be tolerated in France, in Germany, for Jews to be accepted in Canada in public office, in owning various land etc.
When your ideology has a tradition of rejection of others – and this goes back long, long before Israel – then, such change is hard. Same in Israel, where the orthodox have an equally long tradition – centuries old – of rejecting Islamists and ‘gentiles’.
These beliefs have nothing, absolutely nothing, to do with democracy.
RCGA- your ‘only 40% agrees with Harper’ rhetoric is tiresome. After all, only 20% agree with the Liberals and only 30% with the NDP. So, what’s your point?
ET, I can’t be sure you are referring to my post about the 40%, but if you are, your question can only be answered by the poster at the Globe & Mail. That was a paste of a comment below the GM article. I would have been happy to put quotation marks around it and the other comment above if my iPad would have allowed a scroll.
Call me lazy for not pasting it up in a separate program. It’s not my comment. I’m of the view that 80% didn’t vote Liberal, and 70% didn’t vote NDP.
ET >
ET – “yes, I suggest that the Islamic nations will move into democracy”
Like they say “Democracy = two wolves and a sheep deciding on what’s for dinner”.
ET – “….it took time for blacks/whites to collaborate in the US……”
I’d say the jury’s still out on the results of that.
ET – “When your ideology has a tradition of rejection of others – and this goes back long, long before Israel – then, such change is hard”
Not there is the understatement of the century. Of course I agree, and would include that it is the crux of the matter. This is not a simple matter of some western philosophical debate while opening our doors to allow the patients to lounge around our lobby while they make up their minds which direction they wish to go.
Our cultures don’t blend well at all. In fact they are polar opposites.
ET – “….These beliefs have nothing, absolutely nothing, to do with democracy”
Again true, but we do not have the luxury of 200 years of allowing them to merge into our society’s and “hope” those beliefs will transform magically into ours.
Democracy in the ME/ NA is not necessarily in favor of western culture and values, in fact the cultural norms you mentioned has proved the opposite. Self determination is obviously a good thing for Arab peoples, but we need to very cautious about embracing it as a positive thing for us.
Please correct me if I am wrong, I only lived during the time. I keep hearing about this unilatetal war by Israel. If I remember it, Israel was attacked on multiple sides by several different countries. I remember thinking, they are toast, and then they turned around and kicked their butts backwards. That is when they picked up all that buffer land. I was young but it did make an impression on me. Why is nobody correcting the record?
Another Kate
Short answer….Truth is incompatible with the “narrative”.
ET – “the so-called Arab Spring, a movement towards democracy,”
I hope, as others have already said, that your rosy view of the Arab future proves true, but all evidence I’ve seen has been the oposite. Odds are the outcome will be a lot more islamic republics hostile to Israel. Democracy doesn’t necessarily mean a western style government and economy. Perhaps my memory fails me, but wasn’t Hamas democratically elected?
I would guess that the Arab Spring is losing Steam!
Obama is the hand puppet of Soros,and the EU/UN.
He was speaking words provided by the UN (Think Tanks) designed to heat up the ME conflicts
The US Congress would have to revisit 1967, dig up LBJ and hang the bastard for treason re: the attack on the USS liberty….The pain of reliving
those days are not good for Democrats, or the US
Obama is just an ass****
I’ve always found the comments threads at both the G&M and Macleans to be rather telling. Both outlets — particularly doctor’s-office-rag Macleans, which seems to tout that it’s sort of MOR/average Canadian and non-partisan — market themselves as being essentially balanced, but it’s obvious that big-state leftists and disgruntled Liberals offended that their tribe is no longer in charge massively predominate the comments.
I doubt that many Conservatives – outside of Toronto/Ottawa, perhaps – are regular readers of either of these two publications.
Obama’s anti-Israel policy announcement will be read as by the Jihadis as a green light for war on all the Kuffir(Christians and Jews) in the Middle East.
Knew ET’s stance on Israel would not change.
May 22, 2011 Jerusalem Post:
“Over 62 percent of the Arab citizens of Israel believe Jews are a foreign imprint on the Middle East and are destined to be replaced by Palestinians, and a similar proportion believe that Israel has no right to exist as a Jewish state, according to a nationwide survey scheduled for release on Sunday.”
As Martin Luther King Jr. said shortly before his death:
“peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality.
ET: Neither your plan nor Obama’s provide security for the Jews.
A peace plan prepared by the Anti-Christ will be accepted by the Jews and we all know what that will lead to.
That was one important thing Harold Camping left out of his equation.
ET is wearing rose coloured glasses methinks… He/she/it needs to spend less time thinking like “Forest Gump” and more time thinking like “Team America”… Except “Team America” turned puzzy under Obama… Please-please-please bring back “Team America”!
Hey ET, welcome back! Another inter-galactic journey?
We missed your insightful perspective on these geo-political landmines which are so inter-twined in politics, religion, ideology, wealth/ poverty, power/oppression, etc., etc.
It’s nice to read your commentary, even if your views don’t always mirror those of my own. Agree/ disagree, what’s important is it makes one re-evaluate his own standard.
BTW, how about another analysis of the POTUS, and what if anything has changed of late? The dude seems to have a proclivity for stepping in even the most out-of-the-way cowpatties.
I’m with Snagglepuss, great to have you back ET. Please don’t mind some of the less friendly replies to your comments. Your insights and thoroughness always deepen and broaden the debate.
I hope you stick around.
Al Macey >
“So ther’s no reason to deny Hitler was right-wing or that his terrible anti-semitism was right-wing”
Anti-Semitism is undeniably left wing. There is very little support of Israel by the left. The only indignation by the left in western countries (mostly feigned) is fully aimed at so called “right wing” extremist anti-Semitic fringe groups as a way to bolster their moral high ground. A sacrifice to the god of political correctness for ill gotten gains.
Indeed Hitler was a corporate fascist to a large degree, yet he was brought to power on a socialist platform. Sound familiar with anywhere else these days? The degree of socialism is determined by the degree of government control as a simplified definition. The Nazi’s were a socialist party, full stop. Whether Hitler was on track with his parties campaign promises is the debatable issue.
A society that keep it’s women bound up in sacks, stones them to death for flaunting an ankle, forbids young people from having sex other than with farm animals, is incapable of living in peace with civilized neighbors.
They (Muslims) are going to have to lift their leg up a lot higher if they want to piss with the big dogs.
All the philosophizn’ with ET won’t change those facts. Sure, some of them are no doubt trying, but there is a billion three of them and well over a hundred million are determined to keep the rest down.
That is a big ship to sink and with Obama on their side and the rest of the west allowing security guards to frisk their genitals to protect them from costumed bearded freaks with Koran in hand at airports … well … you get the picture.
We will just have to wait for Kate’s asteroid to show up … that is what it will take to bring about the level of change in the human condition that is oh so badly needed.
This planet could not be more messed up … and many of you still think an all wise all merciful, all powerful god is responsible for this show?
Maybe it’s his idea of a cosmic comedy club … I dunno. Perhaps all those saucer sightings are the audience.