Welcome to SDA Late Night Radio.
Tonight we are a nation at a crossroads, facing one of the most troubling and uncertain times in Canada’s history. While many of us have been having sleepless nights over the unjust, almost horrifying scenario being played out, it’s almost impossible to comprehend the weight on Stephen Harper’s broad shoulders tonight as he fights for the nation he loves.
Time for a sing-along, then. One of the real bright spots in these dark times has been the stirring, most unwavering iron support for our prime minister that continues to come from that rare and valued group – conservative women. I invite the SDA army, including Dolly, Marie, soccermom and the inestimable Jema54, to stand up and sing along on the final chorus of tonight’s selection in a way that will be heard by Stephen Harper all the way over there in Ottawa.
He surely needs to hear that you continue to Stand By Your Man no matter what may come, right at the time when he needs it most.
Readers tips are, as always, welcome in the comments.

Here’s a rare gem of commentary from the MSM regarding Dion’s performance this evening.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyZa0G46Uzs
All good men and women of passion and purpose mess up once in a while. Some are BIG f’ups, some are small.
The bloodsport known as politics has few victims … they are eaten up and spewed out pretty quick.
Stay Steffie. Stay.
Jackson Browne – The Load Out / Stay – Live 1978
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtuvXrTz8DY
Take a break from this nightmare to watch this hilarious fellow: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jksnSf1jeyQ
It has NOTHING to do with Canada … well, except that he indirectly takes a shot at our “Human Rights” Commissions!!
*
i guess it’s really true what they say… iggy is the smartest banana in the bunch…
“The Ignatieff official said Mr. Ignatieff’s view not to accept a cabinet position
– if one is offered and it likely would be – should not be interpreted as some
new-founded concern over the coalition or that he is backing out of the coalition.”
two words… political… kryptonite.
*
Previously posted, but finally on the correct thread… the online petition to respect the last election. Please only sign once, and only if you haven’t already. My signature was around 202,000. Current count, 1 hour later, 209,200
Let the New Liberal Blockheads know that there’s a reason you didn’t vote NLB in the last election.
http://www.petitiononline.com/CANADIAN/petition.html
well done edb
Once in Royal Trudeau’s City,
Stephane Dion thought he was PM,
Had himself a caucus rather gritty,
Also Dippers, he had all of them,
Had the Bloc and all their team,
Then woke up and found it was a dream.
This proposed coalition is a mess, but Setting aside the fate of the country for a moment, there is something graceful about the move by Layton/Dion and the coalition. They recognized the political Shi — the situation and dynamic of the moment — and exploited it. Sun-tzu wrote “Ultimate excellence lies not in winning every battle but in defeating the enemy without every fighting”. That may be exactly what happens once this all plays out. Although it makes me a little bit nauseous to say “Dion” or “Layton” and “excellence” in the same paragraph, there is something a wee little bit admirable about the deviousness of this whole plan, and how they exploited Harper’s foolish economic update. Harper may not be in this mess had he studied The Art of War more carefully … or at all.
I was hoping tonights selection would be by John Mellencamp.
‘Little ditty about Jack and Dion…’
I’m not sure if anyone has mentioned it before, but here’s the book “Hot Air”:
http://www.mcclelland.com/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780771080968
Steal the name from a small business, and maybe… well I better read it before I make any other accusations. đ
Talking to my father tonight about the events of the day, while watching the CBC, I had an odd question especially coming from a french canadian in the middle of seperatiste/souveraniste (is that really important hmm unkown montreal pundit?) Quebec. What does the Queen think of all this?
Stephen Harper is meeting the Governor General tommorrow. What power does the PM have against her decision (if she were to accept the coalition)? The Governor general is appointed by the PM but she is the representative of the Queen.
I’m perfectly aware that it’s just another quirk derived from our unique system of government. Obsolete also comes to mind but I’m curious nonetheless.
I wonder what’s going on in jolly old england anyways.
IN the “How Can We Trust A Thing They Say” category:
Every one of the Three Comrades promised Canadians during the election that they would NEVER go into a coalition with any of the others.
So, within a few weeks they ALL broke election promises.
Not only that, every one of them comprimised their party platforms and princiapls that they promised their voters they would fight for. (Except the BLOC – he always said he wanted Quebecd to leave Canada but meanwhile we’ll take every penny we can from the stupid Anglos)
So, Canadians are supposed to believe any of them now?
Whereas, Harper ran on a platform that he then put in the Throne Speech which was passed by all parties in the House last Thursday proving that last Thursday he earned the confidence of the HOuse to carry on with his election platform.
So, who can you trust?
Of course, three parties who ran against the Conservatives will ALL say they have “no confidence” in Harper because he earned the right to enact his platform, not theirs.
How stupid do those jokers think we Canadians are?
Cherenkov, huh? The only thing that this ill conceived coalition did was to awaken the docile and politcally soft Canadian into raging against it. Not exactly a genius move IMO. The one thing that Canadians are is patriotic and buy merging with the bloc, they’ve poked the slumbering with a sharp stick.
Finance Minister Flaherty does a great job of standing up to an antagonistic Craig Oliver.
http://watch.ctv.ca/news/ctvs-question-period/nov-30-2008/#clip117262
at 6:05 Craig Oliver says â..but reducing taxes doesnât put money in peopleâs pocketsâ
âŠ.Oh really
if you love him you’ll forgive him
Even though he’s hard to understand
[…]
‘Cause after all he’s just a man
++
What if you DON’T love him
“Every one of the Three Comrades promised Canadians during the election that they would NEVER go into a coalition with any of the others. So, within a few weeks they ALL broke election promises. “
Harbinger of what’s to come if they are successful. But it wouldn’t matter, ’cause they will not have been elected!
“Promises? What promises? Harper screwed things up so royally it’s going to take months, no wait – YEARS to fix all that bad, evil stuff. And since we’re saving Canada by reinstating democracy by cooperating with the other coalition members we may have to suspend elections for a while as we finish our noble task. Please be patient.”
I consider myself the evil twin of Stephen Harper of the Calgary School đ … or let’s just say I’m a fan.
However his political miscalculations since the election have forced me to reconsider. I would probably make the same mistakes …
Regardless would somebody please bring up the OPEN GROUND WAR THIS COALITION CONTRAPTION WOULD HAVE WITH THE PROVINCES AND REGIONS. Dion talks about concensus when you and I know he’s going to be shoving a lot of rhetorical bull shit down our throats.
The machiavellian in me craves for the COALITION CONTRAPTION to succeed because of the resultant comedy and encrusted underbelly of fringe Canadian Politics on the left would be exposed for all to see. They could talk all they wanted about their unicorns and brotherly love and the ice cap disappearing but to put it all in the spot light for 18 months. What glory.
But I kid myself, nobody would be laughing but me and a couple other guys like in that theater watching ‘Blue Velvet’. Nobody will get it.
So Prorouge Parliament! Put the madness to sleep!
…. but would somedody with an audience pick up the thread of federal provincial political warfare on a number of fronts. Consensus my ass … it will be ivory tower trio of idiot savants preaching from Toronto ‘on high’ … or maybe ‘just high’.
I’ve been doing a lot of thinking over the past while, looking at the whole political situation from every angle… and I’m beginning to wonder if Harper is more of a genius then we are giving him credit for… here is my analysis:
http://anothercanadianblog.blogspot.com/
Cherenkov, maybe PMSH did not study Sun-tzu. He may have studied hockey. He said ‘it is not where the puck is, it is where it is going’.
>Tonight we are a nation at a crossroads… as he fights for the nation he loves.
>Time for a sing-along, then.
Troubling times indeed, and nothing has so much as made me crack a smile of late, but this rendered me helpless with laughter. “Time for a bake-off” or “time for a knit-a-thon” might have done it too, but either of these would, obviously, have had less resonance in the LNRadio context.
A vote of gratitude to EBD for the much-needed Zen slap to the back of the head. I find myself once again grounded in a sustaining awareness that life is always absurd one way or another, that this present absurdity too shall pass, and that the crisis du jour, no matter how momentous, will not prevent the sun from coming up in the morning – and I needed to be reminded of that. Beyond identifying and initiating such constructive action as can intelligently be taken, there’s no point in getting one’s knickers in a twist.
Just the ladies, now…
Banachek,
Thank you for that video:
http://watch.ctv.ca/news/ctvs-question-period/nov-30-2008/#clip117262
Watching it is HIGHLY enlightening to see how the media drives wedges between Canadians.
cherenkov,
What nonsense. Go read Sun Tzu a couple more times and then answer these questions:
1) As of today, what was lost or won and by whom?
2) If your band of excellent idiots “wins” – what would they win, what would they lose? What would the Conservatives lose, what would they win? What would Canadians (except Quebec) win … lose? And Quebec – same questions.
3) Which of the above groups can change any outcome with an election?
4) What would Sun Tzu do to a “general”, given 1, 2 and 3 above, who couldn’t even identify who the “enemy” is?
Why are all the talking heads missing an obvious point, namely a Lib-NDP coalition does not have enough seats to form a government? Remember the Bloc only promised to support them, not join them in any official capacity.
btw, love Tammy’s Darth Vador Helmet Hair.
With regards to Sun Tzu, ” In death ground, fight”
Must read is a column on the front page of National Post today by Terence Corcoran: “Why the PM must persist”. He has it right on.An excerpt from the column: “The whole production is a page from the work of the greatest academic authority on the subject, Princeton philosopher Harry Frankfurt, author of the 2005 bestseller, “On Bullshit”. Liars, says Prof. Frankfurt,need to know the truth. Bullshitters, interested solely in advancing their own agenda, have no use for truth. They just make things up so as to win over their audience”
Now, how much more accurate could anything be to describe the blasted Opposition and the goddamned media in this country?
Texas Canuck,
You’re right. A coalition between the Liberals and NDP does not have nearly enough seats. In order for it to be a coalition, the Bloc must join, rather than support it.
The Bloc will not do this. They want the veto rights to ram whatever they want down the ROC’s throat.
If she pursues this ridiculous notion, this is what the GG is going to have to ask them to do.
I don’t think there’s going to be a coalition government. However, the Liberals are going to wear this for a long time.
Tis time to rethink the political system. If Alberta could be represented in parliament the way PEI is then they (alberta) would be sending 80+ MP’s there. AS it is now structered Alberta with a population of aprox 1 million more people than the entire Maritime provinces, yes including Nfld (32), sends 4 MPs less (28). The total national debt should be divided between the 308 ridings, a referendum held for everyone and see what the new country looks like when the smoke clears. I would bet something like this would send shivers down the spine (metaphorically speaking) of the NDP including Washawaymylease, as I say her after question period in the house being quite indignant at being called “traitor”,along with all other participants of this unholy triumvariate, and demanding an apology. Ms Washawaymylease you and your treacherous compadres are the ones that owe the apology to the Canadian people. One can only hope that this behavior will be duly rewarded in this lifetime or the next.
You know Kate, I’ve resisted being cynical about our
political class. Some people think Harper wears a rug. I don’t know, but if thats the height (no pun intended) of his dishonesty I’m joining his hair club.
Who would have thought that good hair could have brought a retard (okay verbally challenged), a commie and a frog together.
Now we know Dion is Mr comb-over and Layton wears a hat all the time. He pretends to be Jewish except at CAW rallies. Wouldn’t want to offend the brothers-in-bigotry. Could diminish their Buzz.
The frog has a good head of hair but seems to worrry it a lot. Looks kind of wild-eyed. Maybe not a guy fully comfortable with his meds.
Okay, your saying what have illiteracy, Communism and pharmaceuticals to do with the coming change of government. Probably nothing.
Any normal Canadian deals with dim bulbs, zealots, and nut-jobs pretty much daily.
We usually hope to have elected them.
New from RAND Corporation:
Yong Kang, Lu Shi, and Elizabeth D. Brown, Chinese Corporate Governance: History and Institutional Framework
The Chinese economy has been growing rapidly in recent years, as the nation has moved toward a stronger role for private enterprise and capitalism. As China has aligned itself more closely with the international economy, it has also sought to adopt more Western-style oversight mechanisms and legal standards concerning the operation of its corporations. Corporate governance is critically important to a country’s economic growth and stability, because it provides the credibility and confidence in management that is fundamental to capital markets. There has been sparse scholarly research on Chinese corporate governance to date, and this report begins to address this gap by providing an overview of corporate governance mechanisms in China. Kang, Shi, and Brown review the history of Chinese corporate governance; discuss eight pillars that make up the institutional framework for Chinese corporate governance; and identify problems associated with Chinese corporate governance, their policy implications, and areas for further research.
[Summary and full report available in PDF only.]
I wonder if, within the Liberal Party, there are any rumblings of a split to form a new Liberal Party.
That is, with this NDP brokered coalition between the NDP, Dion’s Boys and the Bloc, the Liberal Party has been effectively swallowed by the NDP. How can they campaign in any future election except as buddies? And, with an identity of pure left politics – the socialism of the NDP and Bloc.
Wouldn’t it make sense, now, to save the Liberal Party, for a set of Liberal MPs to break away from the Dion’s Boys, and set up the New Liberal Party or whatever they want to call it. Leave Dion and his Boys dangling in the wind and declare their federalist and democratici principles…that are being destroyed by Layton, Dion and Duceppe.
Post by: ET; That is what I was wondering. Does it seem that maybe there is a behind the scenes doing in this move. Maybe the Liberal/NDP/Bloc centrists are maybe set up doing a house cleaning. If these centrists split off and formed new party, they could have representatives in every province and be a very viable party debt free. Who better to lead them but Micheal Ignattia.
merle – yes, I see your point about being debt free! But, I’d guess that the Dion’s Boys Party would insist on some debt carrying because of the cost of getting the New Liberal Party’s members elected in the October election.
It’s just that I don’t see how the NDP-Liberals in particular, can in future separate themselves. They may see themselves as ‘two separate companies’ with a contract to work together, but in reality, that’s not what is happening and in reality, the public will see them as one.
How can they have two candidates, an NDP and a ‘Liberal’ in the same riding in future elections? How can they ever undo this ‘coalition’ in the future and stand alone?
As I see it, the only way to save the Liberal Party, assuming it ought to be saved, is for a group of MPs in that party to now, break away, refuse to be part of the ‘coalition’ and set up their own party.
I think the coalition is a monstrosity, but even if they don’t get into power, one thing they have still succeeded in doing is irreparably damaging Harper. Nobody is going to come out of this smelling like roses, but Harper has the most to lose and will likely suffer the greatest wound.
while I have my own thoughts on this recent gong show, it has been striking how little Canadians know about their own system of governance, and the Parliamentary system.
We do not have representative democracy in this country. Never have.
So when I see really dumb statements like “But it wouldn’t matter, ’cause they will not have been elected!”, it truly strikes me how much ignorance exists among citizens.
Guess its the way of the world. That, and one generation of politically correct civics classes teaching nothing.
I do trust and hope the Cons will go through, political instability at a time like this is idiotic. But Harper’s cowardly climbdown from Party financing was – to say the least – inelegant.
Doing something that is right, is always right, no matter what the timing.
Simma knows where the PET Cemetery is.
…-
“Former Liberal MP slams coalition, suggests Western separation
Simma Holt
Author / Lecturer / Broadcaster
Member: Canadian News Hall of Fame
Member: Order of Canada
Member: Canadian Association of Former Parliamentarians
Member: Editorial Board: Beyond the Hill (CAFP)
The only way the three losers can get power is by total contempt of the Canadian votersâwith this Coalition. They jeer and yell across the floor of the House of Commons charging Stephen Harper with only one motiveâwanting to hold power. The only sound we hear across the miles is their hysterical demand for their own powerâpower none of them could get from the voters. Canada did not vote for Stephen Dion as the leader of this country.
I was a Liberal MP in the Government of Pierre Elliott Trudeau 1974-79. But there is no place in the Liberal Party of Canada for a true Grit. Nor is there a place for western Canadinans in this Insane Hysteria from the eternal losersâthe NDP, the Bloc, and their chosen leader Stephen Dion â to succeed in this Contemptible Coup.
This cries out to us on the Pacific Rim: âif any part of Canada should separate it is British Columbia.
The contempt of the voters of Canada, and indifference to the economic and political crisis not only of Canada but the world, makes all of these power seekers unfit to service in the Nationâs ParliamentâŠ
Simma Holt”
http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2008/12/former-liberal-mp-slams-coalition-suggests-western-separation/
Dear hardboiled,
I fully understand that we do not have a representative democracy in this country. BUT I am adamant that beyond Constitutional Legitimacy there is also Democratic Legitimacy, which is arguably even more important that the former.
If voters in a democracy do not have the perception of their vote counting then the democracy is doomed. Period. Don’t believe me? Talk with the “voters” in Zimbabwe.
The fact is that collectively Canadians elected a Conservative minority government. Period. Full stop. One can be a Radical Leftist CBC News Kool Aid Drinker and playing “62% mind games” but such talk is all nonsense and completely flies in the face of 141 years of our history.
For me, the primary reason there is no Democratic Legitimacy to Le Coalition is the timing. It’s not even 2 months after the recent election. A budget hasn’t even been presented. Yet now our vote is going to be discarded?
The secondary reason is the revelation that Jack Layton, Gilles Duceppe, and possibly Stephane Dion had this all planned long ago. Whether or not we all should have heard the NDP Conference Call is up for debate but we did and heard in Layton’s own words what he & the others had cooked up.
On these two reasons alone, what historical precedent is there for the government being overthrown in Canada? 1985 in Ontario and 1926 federally are frequently cited by Le Coalition supporters. Neither are remotely similar to what is going on now. So there is no precedent. And there’s an obvious reason why there’s no precedent: Because if it were commonplace then minority governments would be thrown out of office every few months and the stability we’ve all enjoyed and prospered from would be thrown into ruin.
The tertiary reason is the 3rd pillar of Le Coalition, the Bloc Quebecois. I find it rather peculiar/perverted that a party dedicated to removing Quebec from Canada (which would likely lead to the breakup of the rest of Canada btw) is now going to be part of the government. I concede that this is a weaker argument than the other two but is still very real in the minds of many, especially Western Canadians it seems.
You can argue that there’s no such thing as Democratic Legitimacy in a Parliamentary System. But I will absolutely & vehemently disagree for the rest of my days on this planet.
Robert W.
robert w – nice post. Thanks.
Not only is there no precedence – and the 1926 King coalition is totally different from this attempt, for King was in power, called an election, lost it to the Conservatives, and, since he hadn’t yet resigned as PM, [and that’s a key point!!! He was still, legally, PM until he resigned!]…he said that he could continue to govern with the coalition of the Progressives. The NDP-Liberals-Bloc were not in power before our October election.
And, what the Coalition is proposing is a government that has not been approved by the electorate. We didn’t vote for a coalition and of course, this 62% is sheer manipulative nonsense.
Furthermore, their restructing of the House is setting up a two-tiered process.
Motions would be voted on by MPs who are electable by 100% of the Canadian electorate. BUT, these Motions will have to be vetted by a ‘higher House authority, the Bloc, before they are actually approved. This ‘higher Authority’ consists of MPs who are electable by less than 20% of the Canadian electorate. More than 80% of the Canadian electorate will have no power to elect this level of the House.
That’s not a democracy.
I agree with most of your statements, inasmuch as the rational and earnest reasoning you include.
The fact of the matter is democratic legitimacy is irrelevant – it has no founding in the Parliamentary system. You elect a parliamentarian. They elect the government. That is the ‘full stop’. And no matter how right you may or may not be, sadly, it doesn’t matter.
There is nothing unconstitutional nor unlawful about the Three Stooges.
Being angry or (as I) disgusted that we pay fealty to a foreign monarch within a bureaucracy that simulates democratic tenets, the bottom line is that we have no such genuine democratic governance construct in this nation. Ask a westerner.
The larger concern of myself is that now there is precedent for a sitting government to avoid a confidence vote – by prorogation.
Think of that the next minority that doesn’t get bounced. Especially when you are on the other side of the partisan fence.
Worst of all, Harper cowardly climbed down from what is a very democratic action: cutting off political parties from getting welfare cheques. It was the right thing to do. It remains the right thing to do.
I understand and mostly agree with you.
The problem is that we live in a statist gulag built and designed for the rulers, not the citizen. God save our gracious Queen man.
You may rise.
…when she says so…
hardboiled – I understand your concerns about a multi-tiered political system – but we must have such a system because it sets up checks and balances. I agree that a GG such as we have, is ridiculous though I’m not against the monarchy as a symbol of history.
But, more to the point, what the ‘Coalition’ was setting up was a deeply undemocratic process.
Democracy matters. You may not think so, but it has to be the mainstay of our system. It even says so in our Charter – ‘a free and democratic society’.
However, our MPs are not free to do as they wish; we have a representative system and they must represent, not themselves, but us. Therefore, they are not as unbound and random as you suggest.
The Coalition was ignoring the results of the last election, and instead, setting up a blatant coup. To call it constitutional is irrelevant, for our constitution says nothing about coalitions. Nor is it legitimate, in that it both ignores our election and its duty to abide by our wishes in that election. It also refuses to take its option, a coalition, to the people.
The precedent that the coalition was setting up was such that in every minority government situation, and this is almost our normal mode, at each and every annual budget, the opposition parties would regularly bring down the current government and install themselves. Without an election. Is that democracy?
Harper was right to prorogue government and give the Canadian people the opportunity to see and debate the Hidden Agenda of the Coalition. Layton, Duceppe, Dion, wanted to keep it hidden from us and spring it on the day of the budget and leap into power. Just like that. Barring us from having an election for several years, by bribing the Bloc to support them.
That’s a travesty of our system. If our system doesn’t have in it, rules that could outlaw such a disgraceful action as these Three anti-democratic stooges have set up, then, now we know, and can develop such laws.
Any political miscalculation on PM Stephen Harper’s part may be his thinking that the opposition parties would NEVER stoop as low as they have. He may have thought that they had more integrity and that they held the Canadian electorate in higher esteem. As it is, they’ve been playing us all for fools.
Who else would have thought that this Troika of Twits, with about one and a half brains between them and even fewer moral or ethical scruples, would have dared to put together a coalition to form a new government (sic) just six weeks after the CPC was duly and democratically elected–and a coalition whose de facto Prime Minister would be the separatist par excellence, Gilles Duceppe?
If PMSH can be faulted, I suggest it’s for being a thoroughly decent and civilized guy (unlike his counterparts in the Dumb Dude’s Coalition)–and a shrewd politician for understanding that the revoking of the $1.95/vote public subsidy would smoke out the parsimonious pettiness of the Opposition parties.
I’m not so sure that PMSH didn’t mean to go for broke. These asshats, in the first week of Parliament, notwhithstanding their voting in favour of the Throne Speech, were already beginning to gag, blindfold, and bind the arms and legs of PMSH and his CPC. Can you imagine ANOTHER Parliamentary session the same as the last? A slow and painful death.
Maybe PMSH simply decided to speed up the inevitable.
The PET Cemetery is found by another “Bedrock Lib”.
…-
“Thursday, Dec 4
Bedrock Lib weighs in: Realist Liberals should cross the floor
As a lifelong Liberal, may I suggest that two can play this lethal Coalition game.
If Dion can rule in a sleazy new order driven by the separatists (rest in peace, PET!), logic dictates that some centre-right Liberals might regard Harper as the lesser of the two evils and cross the floor to join him, at least temporarily. According to reports on the Web a few of the Ignatieff stripe are already entertaining this prospect. The upshot would be a true division of political authority in Ottawa at last: The forces of the Left, embracing Dion’s expedient, power-mad Liberals, the NDP and the equally socialistic Bloc and a Centre-Right group, consisting of the necessarily more moderate Conservatives and Realist Liberals. After all, Harper, even though he is a bully and who inflicted this crisis on himself, at the very least supports a strong, united Canada, unlike Dion’s separatist allies.
Meanwhile, may I recommend to Dion and his caucus drones that they read the essays of the late Oxford historian, AJP Taylor, on the decline and fall of the British Liberals. By seeking a coalition with the Loony Left and the separatists, they are on a similar march of folly to the one that destroyed their equally arrogant British cousins who made deals with devils.
Oh, a final thought: Surely all paid up members of the Liberal Party should be allowed to vote on whether to enter a coalition with our hitherto mortal socialist and separatist foes? Or is the Liberal party now the preserve of a clique of self-empowered MPs who would liquidate the noble legacy of Trudeau to consort with the likes of the triumphant Gilles Duceppe and the smarmy Layton?
Raymond Heard”
http://www.bourque.org/notes.html
To note, I was responding to Robert.
And ET: you’ve obviously been drinking your bathwater.
Obituary: Odetta: singer who joined Martin Luther King on his freedom march
One of the great voices of the Civil Rights movement, Odetta brought the diva-like power of an opera singer to US folk music.
Had she chosen the world of R&B, gospel and soul music, she might have been a rival to Aretha Franklin, Mavis Staples and Nina Simone, but she preferred the more understated pleasures of folk â although her repertoire did also encompass blues, spiritual, jazz, work hollers and civil rights songs. An early influence on Bob Dylan, she drew her own inspiration from the great seam of traditional US song and the acoustic blues of the prewar era…
Why Wall Street Always Blows It
In my example from the housing boom, for instance, each participantâs job was not to predict what the housing market would do but to accomplish a more concrete aim. The buyer wanted to buy a house; the real-estate agent wanted to earn a commission; the mortgage broker wanted to sell a loan; Wall Street wanted to buy loans so it could package and resell them as âmortgage-backed securitiesâ; Alan Greenspan wanted to keep American prosperity alive; members of Congress wanted to get reelected. None of these participants, it is important to note, was paid to predict the likely future movements of the housing market. In every case (except, perhaps, the buyerâs), that was, at best, a minor concern.
“As much as I like” … Wrong thread.
This is aletter to the editor.
Dera Mr. Ed,
N.L. is not hockeycountry; it’s Danny ABC williams country, aka Newfie/Labrador.
Noter Mr.Ed: These words from MSM, “the North American market” is the Dead Tree Newspaper market.
Newsprint, Mr. Ed. Can you hear the tree falling?
But, hope youse don’t fall too far; newspapers are great for recycling in the old wood stove.
One more, Mr. ed; its’ Bowater, not bathwater.
…-
“AbitibiBowater cuts 1,100 jobs, closes N.L. mill
Paper producer AbitibiBowater Inc. (TSX:ABH) is cutting 1,100 jobs as it closes its troubled newsprint mill in Grand Falls, N.L., and a plant in Tennessee to cope with falling demand in the North American market” (nnw)
and a shrewd politician for understanding that the revoking of the $1.95/vote public subsidy would smoke out the parsimonious pettiness of the Opposition parties. Posted by: batb at December 4, 2008 2:13 PM
He sure wasn’t shrewd on this. He had 2 rabid dogs backed into a corner (Dion & Duceppe – whose parties would atrophy without their government cheques). What is really worse, is that Harper climbed down over it, and got nothing. In negotiations, that is the worst case scenario.
So, the Three Stooges remain (for now at least), threatening to take out the government (or more likely, an Ignatieff/Harper election in the spring).
Either or, now financing rules are off the table for years, and the government is still unstable.
And nothing was gained. How Canadian.
Odetta Live in concert 2005, “House of the Rising Sun”
Among the corpses in the litter box of the Lib caucus: Kyoto Dead, Green Shift Dead, Separatist Coalition Dead.
Next: Bring Ad$Cam Chretien-MartinJr-Gagliano-CitoyenDion, et al, into a criminal court under oath.
Answer this question: Where have you stashed the $140 million your Liberal Party stole from the tax payers of Canada via Ad$Cam?
…-
“Liberal MP Jim Karygiannis says coalition is
finished, Dion should resign
After emerging from a closed-door meeting with the Liberal caucus, the MP for Scarborough-Agincourt Jim Karygiannis emerged with some critical words for the leadership and communication skills of Liberal leader Stephane Dion”
…-
“Only ‘monumental changes’ will save Harper’s government: Dion
The Liberals are “more committed than ever” to replacing the Tories in government, said Liberal Leader StĂ©phane Dion on Thursday, after Gov. Gen. MichaĂ«lle Jean granted Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s request to suspend Parliament until Jan. 26.(via nnw)