Where the foxes caper unmolested, the government packs your school lunch, and the Infidel Prince of Londonistan arrives home;
Muslim fanatics labelled Prince Harry a target for assassins last night after his heroics against the Taliban.
Harry’s perilous Army mission in Afghanistan was dismissed by British extremists as a mere publicity stunt.
But they also claimed that by participating in an “illegal war”, the brave young Prince had made himself fair game for a terrorist attack.
Wasn’t he already “fair game” before all of this? It seems that all you have to be is a living breathing human being, according to their standards.
“Tory MPs last night condemned the outpourings by three influential Islamic radicals as “highly irresponsible”.”
How about highly seditious? How about arresting these traitors and deporting them?
I think they should have let him stay in Afghanistan. At least there he’d have the chance to fight against his enemies – back in Britain all he can do is wait for them to find him.
He thought he served his country well. Must be hard to take coming home to a hate filled welcome by nothing less than scumbags. The Brits should tell the cud chewing Choudrey since he hates the UK so much, he’s getting a free trip out of there to Afghanistan tomorrow morning. Brick hut waiting.
They wouldn’t dare. The blood of the Prophet flows in her veins and thus in her Grandson Harry…’United Press International
October 10, 1986
MOSLEMS IN BUCKINGHAM PALACE
Mixed in with Queen Elizabeth’s blue blood is the blood of the Moslem prophet Mohammed, according to Burke’s Peerage, the geneological guide to royalty. The relation came out when Harold B. Brooks-Baker, publishing director of Burke’s, wrote Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher to ask for better security for the royal family. ”The royal family’s direct descent from the prophet Mohammed cannot be relied upon to protect the royal family forever from Moslem terrorists,” he said. Probably realizing the connection would be a surprise to many, he added, ”It is little known by the British people that the blood of Mohammed flows in the veins of the queen. However, all Moslem religious leaders are proud of this fact.”
RFB, Muslius lay claim to everything you know. Better check my ancestry. Did you know satin was a muslim?
An interesting contrast.
Britsh royalty Prince Harry goes and fights in a war in a far away country for noble freedom and the gift of democracy. So women can get educated and live without fear.
Meanwhile, Central Canadian faux royalty Justin Trudeau admonishes Albertans to learn a language, French, to spread Quebec’s power and influence.
Nobody bothered to tell Trudeau that last yr, Calgary had over 7000 applications refused for spaces in the tech schools and university entrance because they did not have space for them.
And Edmonton was short space for another 6000 unsucessful applicants.
Last thing these kids want or need is to be misdirected into somebodys ego-stroking language program.
Britons march around calling for death to cartoonists, death to infidels, death to America – what a bloodthirsty bunch!
Harry should emigrate, the Islamic Republik of Britain doesn’t seem to want him anyhow…
Its a good thing Prince Harry isn’t a Canuck, or he’d have a Human Rights Commission Section 13 action brought against him by some Indignant Imam.
Remember: Don’t squeeze the Warman, Mr. Whipple.
When the Cult of Hate attacks Prince Harry, they’d better be ready to die as I don’t think Harry has any plans on being a willing victim.
He is a 2nd Lt. in the Blues & Royals Household Cavalry and knows a thing or two about combat.
I salute the warrior prince for serving his queen & country on the front lines. I can see why they had to get him out of there once he was outed. Imagine what would have happened had the Taliban captured him. The only silver lining behind that would have been that the British people would finally have had enough and methinks the “islamic problem” in Britain would have perhaps been taken care of more directly.
Well, I dont think theres any doubt about him being a high value target, but, and I m really not surprised by your attempt to turn this into a muslim bashing stunt, the REAL debate here is about media self-censorship.
Should Drudge have broken the story or not? Did they put his life in jeopardy?
On this site you get a dime a dozen posts to bash muslims, which is about all most of the folk here are good at, so how about a real debate on how the media has conducted itself, and how it should conduct itself.
Who knows, it might show the thinkers amongst the brainwashed.
sput, muslims need to be bashed and drudge needs his ass kicked.
Just use the existing laws. Verbal threats against a memeber of the Royal Family are supposed to carry a charge over and above the normal penalty. Should be enforced.
OF course a couple of MI5 or is it 6 mysterious deaths should settle the question ASAP.
[Posted, also, above]
Anyone even breathing these threats against the second in line to the throne needs to be thrown out of England–and immediately. As far as I’m concerned, they have forfeited any “right” to freedom of expression–or any other “rights,” for that matter.
This is an intolerable situation for Prince Harry and the Royal Family and, therefore, should not be tolerated. Enough is enough. British hospitality should not extend to those threatening the life of a soldier serving in the West’s great battle for the very existence of our Civilization.
These threats simply confirm the barbarity of the enemy–which is not only at the gates but inside the fortress, which makes the MSM’s role in outing Prince Harry especially pernicious. Once the press found out that he was in Afghanistan, they should have kept their mouths firmly shut and their pens duly still.
Loose lips sink ships.
Posted by: batb at March 2, 2008 9:09 AM
Fair enough, old white man, but then are you condoning the media’s discretion in choosing what to report and what not to report?
And similarly, what about websites like Drudge’s or indeed this one, that purport to bring to public attention certain facts?
Should Kate keep an eye on what she is saying/promoting, too?
Did a bit of research. Seems that the law that might apply is treason. BUT treason only applies to threats against the Monarch, the first born male or against the defilement of the female companion of the king or the eldest daughter of the King and Queen or the female companion of the eledest born male of the King and Queen.
Essentially no threat to the direct line of succession.
Harry would appear to be left out of that. So a threat to kill Harry would appear not to amount to treason, just your every day run of the mill threat against any person.
Sorry my mistake earlier, no special sanction for threats against Harry…Wills, the Queen are different stories.
http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1475212
Hope that clarifies one small point.
I still like the MI5/6 option though.
One more sign of the serious problem that England faces. And since when did these fanatics worry about legitmate targets, anyway?
Just thinking of how they complain of the tight lips of the Conservatives about their actions in Afghanistan. Shows you how irresponsibly the media is about putting people over there in danger. It is not if they are using words over there. They do have guns and UEDs, plus that they are very fanatical, “Western World meaning CRAZY”. Like the person said before in post, “LOOSE LIPS SINK SHIPS”. Merle Underwood
Just to set the facts straight.
Drudge posted the story AFTER it was released by the Australian media.
The Royal Family has SEMITE BLOOD?! Wait’ll the Peerage finds out… 😉
While it is apparent that the media has been irresponsible in this matter, Kate’s post is about the despicable and possibly treasonous utterances of representatives of the Religion of Peace living in Britain. The REAL debate on these threads is normally about the subject of the post.
I think that Prince Harry deserves all credit due for serving his country in a dangerous war zone. As a member of a constitutional monarchy he is therefore part of the democratically elected government of Great Britain. Having radical imams make deaths against him back home amounts to treason. Call me old school, but when it comes to treason, hanging, drawing and quartering has a lot going for it.
an “illegal war”???
Let’ see:
1. Authorized by multiple UNSC resolutions;
2. conducted under the aegis of NATO;
3. AT the request and with the support of the new democratically elected Afghanistan Govt.
WTF would these twerps’ definition of a “legal war” be? By logical connection, wouldn’t it therefore be the “war” conducted by the other side- the Taliban, Al Qaeda and all the other Islamofascists? Or would that be a just a bit too blatant Jihadism?
Of course there’s always the possibility that Harry may suffer from “post traumatic stress” and run amok. Quite possibly taking the clock tower (Big Ben) and reliving some of his Afghan nightmares. Just saying……….
Sounds like a threat to me. No matter that some people have an opposition to the Monarchy, many Royalists are probably seething. The explosion will be quite spectacular.
The 22nd is probably making “contingency” arrangements as we speak.
It’ll suck to be a fuzzy wuzzy muzzy.
They are talking themselves into an asswhipping.
I’m stocking up on popcorn and beer. 😀
Fanatics would kill their own mothers if the woman forbid them the thrill of a good old fashioned killing. The Prince was simply fullfilling his part of military service to his country and if that means killing the enemy, so be it. These animals already have the Royals on their hit list. If they haven’t been successful those far I highly doubt they’ll ever get close. Besides if they ever did I’m certain what happened in the Falklands would be kids stuff compared to the stuff that would go down. The call to arms from the UK would be different from a NATO and UN call by far. It would be very personal and I’m sure violent for the fanatics both inside and outside of England.
England has put itself in grave danger through stupid, ill thought out immigration.
There is little evidence of peace anywhere in this world where the religion of Islam rules and much evidence of danger, terrorist activity and threats where they have emigrated. We can call them moderate or radical, how do we know the difference until it’s too late?
They are not a fit with the modern Western democracies, firmly stuck in the Stone Age.
We in Canada had better take note and fast.
If the reward for a suicide bomber is 72 virgins, what’s the reward for a female suicide bomber?
set you free >
“If the reward for a suicide bomber is 72 virgins, what’s the reward for a female suicide bomber?”
The reward is zero muslim husbands to beat them nightly!………
“If the reward for a suicide bomber is 72 virgins, what’s the reward for a female suicide bomber?”
The come back as a Christian.
“If the reward for a suicide bomber is 72 virgins, what’s the reward for a female suicide bomber?” —
“set you free” at 5:54 PM
The official explanation I’ve heard is that female “shaheeds” “miraculously” get their hymens back so they can service male “shaheeds”.
“England has put itself in grave danger through stupid, ill thought out immigration.”
Well, considering that the main threat are the descendents/ grandchildren of the folks who moved to Britain in Colonial times, thats akin to saying that England has put itself in grave danger through colonialism.
They were subjects of the British empire when they moved to England. Hardly immigration per se. Even the second wave of predominantly hindu immigrants from Uganda in the 70’s were British passport holders.
Well, considering that the main threat are the descendents/ grandchildren of the folks who moved to Britain in Colonial times, thats akin to saying that England has put itself in grave danger through colonialism.
No, actually, it isn’t. Anyone with a decent grasp of logic ought to be able to understand why.