WSJ;
Six members of the Paw family, each listing the house at 41 Shelbourne Ave. as their residence, have donated a combined $45,000 to the Democratic senator from New York since 2005, for her presidential campaign, her Senate re-election last year and her political action committee. In all, the six Paws have donated a total of $200,000 to Democratic candidates since 2005, election records show.
|
 |
More – Where there’s a Clinton, can shady financers be far away?
Must be all that money they saved by not hiring a landscaper.
or a house painter who wasn’t color blind.
Nothing to see her. The Clinton’s integrity is unimpeachable….errrrr…forget about that one…
This smells to high heaven. Unfortunately the Hillary loving MSM won’t run with it.
A single income mailman forks over $200,000 in the past 2 years to Dem candidates, but, never gave a dime until 3 years before. Please, please, let this go before a jury of regular folks, hey, even third graders. There is a money laundering offense to this, besides breaking campaign contribution laws.
The Clintons weren’t nicknamed The First Grifters for nothing.
“There is no factual support for this story and if Mr. Hsu’s name was Smith or Jones, I don’t believe it would be a story.” He didn’t elaborate.
He didn’t need to elaborate…you’re questioning a Democrat ergo, you must be a racist.
I think SOOOOOOMMMMMTTTTTTHHHHHHIIIIINNNGGGGGG smells fishy here ! Identical amounts ? Postal worker ? Green Card in 82 ? Lives in trailer? Total Giving = $200,00.00 ? Yeaaaaaaaa Right !!!!!!
Move along now …… shows over folks.
Clinton and company not doing anything inappropriate …. never have never will….
Looks like Chretien’s Liberal backroom boys found new employment.
After all, the Shawinigan Strangler and Clinton were pals, right?
Maybe they got loans from Joe Volpe’s kids?
Hehe well I hope the Paws enjoy their upcoming fun. Their about to have the equivalent of a colonoscopy performed upon them by several agencies, with the IRS calling first dibs.
Now I take it the head of this family would be Paw Paw?
Hil.must have taken Fundraising 101 from Volpe!Were any of this family legally dead??
IT TAKE A VILLAGE IDIOTS TO MAKE GOOD CHILD INTO A WHINNY LITTLE LIBERAL BRAT WANTING TO HUG TREES EAT VEGGIE BURGERS AND CALL THE EARTH THEIR MOTHER
*Opens SDA door and peaks inside, surprised to find a room full of wankers engaged in mutual masturbation*
Hello…? Oops, wrong room – I was looking for critical discussion.
Hey it’s the democrats, it must be on the up-and-up, surely.
I think the correct term would be there is something rotten in Democrat er Denmark!
Is that home an indication of a “subprime mortgage” in all its splendor?
Wo ai zhongguo ren.
Wo ai zhongguo ren.
Wo ai zhongguo ren.
Ni hao ma; ni hao ma; ni hao ma; zaijien!
The article made Drudge. Yes!
If I was a member of the Paw Family I wouldn’t be caught dead in Fort Macey park !!!
,
The MSM will eventually run this article under the heading:
Bush orders illegal probe to discredit Hillary
Anon, you shouldn’t be so critical of wankers, as they say 1% admits to it, the other 99% lies about it.
Anon: It is back to rabble and kos for you. this site is for grown-ups. After you wash your mouth out with soap first, that is.
Nothing like getting caught redhanded to take the humor out of a situation, eh Anon?
Actually it does the trick for Hillary.
It’s the Paws that refreshes.
>> “This smells to high heaven. Unfortunately the Hillary loving MSM won’t run with it.”
Um… what source exactly do you think Kate linked to here?
Huffington already talked about this issue. It’s boring, but perfect for the SDA echo chamber.
You guys really have the ol’ “circle jerk” vibe going strong over here.
In actual fact this isn’t surprising or unusual, especially for those desiring power and those who want to help said person get the power. Just ask ole Joe “I have no mob connections” Volpe how it works. The common thread is that wanna be kings and king makers will find ways of doing things. The Clintons have a very deep closet when it comes to the quest for power. Whether it is he or she or both that have the ambition, I don’t really know.
BTW anon, nice cherry picking.
The address is less than two miles from San Francisco’s southern border, but SURPRISE! the story didn’t make it onto the San Franciso Chronicle‘s web site. The web site does, however, have room for important stories such as “Fewer Unwanted Pit Bulls in SF” and “A Vow to Tackle Urban PTSD”.
Hey leftard idiot. You come to a right wing blog and read right wing stuff. What did you expect? A gay love in? A prayer for the pedophile martyr? Support of AGW? Are you a total f@#$ing moron?
The long suffering Hillary will make it to the White House and Billy Boy can have all the fun.
>> “but SURPRISE! the story didn’t make it onto the San Franciso Chronicle’s web site.”
because, of course, everyone there is NO such thing as copyright laws in San Francisco!!
damn those rich democrat civil servants. btw, san fran is now trying to get black americans to return to the city. not sure why the hell they would want to.
“The long suffering Hillary will make it to the White House …”
Not a chance.
It’s all theater.
Americans may often be fools, but not when the chips are down.
Anon, does the Neptec Design Group know what you do on their computers during the day? If you don’t like the discussion here, you know where the door is.
Looks like the Paws didn’t get their tax deduction for the political donations 😀
Interestingly enough the “Paws” are common in Liberal ridings north and south of 49th.
If the genetic pattern is linear the 6 Paws will be casting 12 ballots. 😉
This may not be an issue today or in the near future, but once she gets the nomination we can expect a ‘swift-boat’-like attack by the reps IF it is in their interest (i.e. if they do not have similar suspect donors).
Also, it is very doubtful that this is the only money-laundering scheme going on. Remember this is in large part what brought Nixon down…
This may not be an issue today or in the near future, but once she gets the nomination we can expect a ‘swift-boat’-like attack by the reps IF it is in their interest (i.e. if they do not have similar suspect donors).
Also, it is very doubtful that this is the only money-laundering scheme going on. Remember this is in large part what brought Nixon down…
This may not be an issue today or in the near future, but once she gets the nomination we can expect a ‘swift-boat’-like attack by the reps IF it is in their interest (i.e. if they do not have similar suspect donors).
Also, it is very doubtful that this is the only money-laundering scheme going on. Remember this is in large part what brought Nixon down…
Jeeze, trolls are busy today eh? Probably trying to get in some quality trolling before school starts next week.
>> “but SURPRISE! the story didn’t make it onto the San Franciso Chronicle’s web site.”
because, of course, everyone there is NO such thing as copyright laws in San Francisco!!
and because the Chronicle is incapable of doing investigative reporting
and because the Chronicle is incapable of putting a link to the WSJ story on its page
and because the Chronicle is incapable of paying the WSJ to put the story on its page (much of the Chronicle‘s content is either wire-service feed or has come from other newspapers)
etc.
and evidently there is no such thing as proper punctuation or agreement of verb and predicate nominative in some people’s heads
Silicon:
The WSJ “broke” the story TODAY, if it turns out to be a story. The second a story like this breaks, other papers don’t have any right to it and they don’t put links on their sites to competitor’s news items. Fancy that.
Typically, if a paper doesn’t have a syndicalization arrangement beforehand, they’ll not sell the story until a day or so later so they can get the mileage out of it. Especially, if there is a series of follow-ups over the next few days. By then, the others aren’t so interested in paying because they’ll have read the original article and sent their own reporters to gather the same information.
Just checked my calender. And ‘lo… it’s still August 28!
What you don’t seem to acknowledge is that media is business. They try to make money. They don’t make money if they give their product away or tell their readers to go elsewhere. Anyone who just takes a story is stealing it.
Silicon, Penny, other Vast Leftwing Media Conspiracy theorists: As predicted by anyone with any objectivity and a quarter of a brain, the story has indeed been picked up by many many papers and other media: news.google.com/news?tab=wn&ie=UTF-8&ncl=1120041913&hl=en
Some are reporting on the news of the WSJ story, others on their own digging or the Clinton response.
People, you have to relax a bit, loosen the tin foil hats.
At the very least, don’t whine about the media not jumping all over a story that is hours old one day, and then whining about what a horrible media we have the next because they put an article up without independently verifying every single fact (which, guess what, takes more time).
Hey, Ted, right hat, wrong crowd.
The Wapo, the NYT’s, CNN, NPR, CBS, pick any evening news you want, etc can report the story “as revealed by the Wall Street Journal today”, happens all of the time, your garbage about syndication rights is nonsense.
“if it turns out to be a story”…..looks well documented to me, the WSJ doesn’t have a legacy of poorly vetting or egregious well publicized corrections. Or, a question to you, what part of the story doesn’t look like a story to Ted’s eyes?
But, I know you were trying to make a point here and it was?……..
Funny you should mention the NYT, CNN, CBS (and you could have mentioned NBC and a few others), since SURPRISE SURPRISE they are indeed already reporting it.
Ah, but the oh so astute Silicon and Penny are on the ready for that deft use of FACTS and basic reality to counter their conspiracy theory. Within in minutes they’ll point out that there are some media that haven’t yet reported on this hours old story so THERE. Proof positive!!!!!
Vast Leftwing Media Conspiracy Theorists of the world, untie, er, UNITE!
Let me sign up. Pass me a tin foil hat!
As usual Ted you have nothing to add and are late to the game. Have you always finished last ted?
“What you don’t seem to acknowledge is that media is business.”
So is prostitution but one is legal one isn’t…go figure. Media whores=business but common whore=criminal….must be a matter of how much political juice your patronage has.
She means well. Isn’t that enough?
Pass me a tin foil hat!
Love to, Ted, but, they are in short supply here.
All used up, eh, penny? No surprise you’ve run out.
All used up, eh, penny?
Not standard issue here, Ted, no inventory to lend out. Sorry.
But, back to my question….“Or, a question to you, what part of the story doesn’t look like a story to Ted’s eyes?” Let’s not globalize of obfuscate with a lame departure into “Vast Leftwing Media Conspiracy Theorists”, specifically defend your statement “if it turns out to be a story”. Just do it, Ted, answer that question.
I missed your answer.
Exactly, penny, don’t change the topic.
You claimed that “The Media” wouldn’t cover this.
There are plenty of reasons why other competing media would not yet have covered an hours old story. Even then, some already have covered it.
Are you now retracting your unsupported/unsupportable inference?