50 Replies to “Climate Barbie: Origins”

  1. Whenever she says “climatechangeclimatechangeclimatechange”, what she’s really saying is: “I’m going to convince you that things are scary. I will save you from all those scary things once you elect me as Prime Minister, you unsophisticated hicks.”

    I’ll bet she’s already debating what sort of curtains she wants for 24 Sussex.

    1. You touched on a great point to me….

      **GlobalWarmingGlobalWarmingGlobalWarmingGlobalWarmingGlobalWarmingGlobalWarming**

      I think it is vital that we not fall into the eco-idiots’ newest propaganda trap of ‘denying climate change’ and that we repeatedly and firmly hold these fraudsters to their original PROMISE of…. CATASTROPHIC MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING!!

      I am actually hopeful that our very own Climate Barbie will be Canada’s version of a Hilary/Pelosi, and her overt ignorance and arrogance will actually end up helping us in exposing their lies.

      1. Good point except that Pelosi is apparently still in control when it comes to the latest budget, for example.

      2. Couldn’t agree more Canadian Observer. That was a clever move for them to change the term to Climate Change so they can blame EVERYTHING on it. And they do without any challenge from the Media. Same as when they say Tax on CARBON. Or CARBON pollution. I always correct them asking, You mean a Tax on CARBON DIOXIDE? Air we breath out? Plant food? Or… CARBON DIOXIDE is a pollutant? When did that SCIENCE change?

      1. They probably do. After all, are there any polar bears in Antarctica?

        Then again, how come there aren’t any penguins in Canada, besides those that are in zoos and, of course, stuffed likenesses of Opus from Bloom County? It must be due to climate change, right?

  3. Climate Barbie still hasn’t figured it all out. Somehow she thinks she is the minister in charge of the weather. It figures I suppose, more simplistic than explaining what she can’t explain due to lack of knowledge on the environment file. To compensate for this she tells us peons she has no time for us “folks” , “like you know” we really gotta get our acts together, she tells us she has three children, where that fits in the discussion is anyone’s guess.

    1. “she tells us she has three children, where that fits in the discussion is anyone’s guess.” MacKenna’s a “superhero” dontcha know, just like super-lisp Juthtin… not only do they both like to dress up as “superheros”, they”re both going to save all the little children by taxing the hell out of you and me and everyone else, that’ll stop globull warming/climate change/pollution/whatever they call it now. ( sarcasm aside) MacKennas an arrogant cow and an admitted fool who knows nothing of her file. MacKenna’s emotional pivot to the empty “but think of the children” talking point just further illustrates her phoniness, her personal shallowness and the utter lack of any substantial knowledgeable evidence to back up her doomsday claims , she’s a fake, just like that lisping turd Juthtin.

  4. Yes but:

    – She’s right.
    – We’re wrong ( – not that she gives a $hit what we think about anything, anyways – ).
    – She KNOWS this – and her Boss knows it even harder.

    You can’t fix stupid – thank FR1G we can still vote it out, hopefully soon, but all they need is Toronto and Quebec; and they both know this too.

    – from the Maritimes, who voted-in 100% Liberal last time, and will almost certainly do the same next time – 🙁

    1. Yeah, good luck with your “voting them out” delusion. By the next election, no one who is cisgengered or white will even be allowed to hold public office in this country.

      I will be laughing pretty hard when the white females get the same demotion down the victim totem pole that they gave to the white males.

  5. Per Wikipedia, for whatever that’s worth.
    Studied French and International relations in the University of Toronto. Masters from London School of Economics in international relations, and law degree from McGill. How that qualifies her for an appointment as Minister of Environment and Climate Change you’ll have to ask your PM. Of course the very title of the office denotes propaganda rather than science.
    And she has the temerity to be uppity about her scientific beliefs? What her background eminently qualifies her for is ambassador to France, where she can compare notes with the French government on how best to deal with the Muslim immigration situation.
    And oh, her three children are very relevant to environmentalists, in a negative way. One child is barely acceptable, two children do irreparable harm to the environment, and three children are just evil.

    1. – Yes, but David Suzuki has five; that’s okay though, because they’re being raised by David Suzuki.

      “Greeeen Tyranny for THEE, but not for ME”…

    2. How that qualifies her for an appointment as Minister of Environment and Climate Change

      That’s easy. With no background whatsoever in science, she’s impartial, neutral, and unbiased. In other words, she is completely uncontaminated by such things as actual knowledge about the subject, which has some additional side effects such as facts and reasoned analysis.

      She’d make a great brain surgeon with that, don’t you think?

  6. C C Barbie remains the best asset to opponents of a Liberal carbon tax grab, the more she talks the more she demonstrates how utterly clueless she is on environmental matters. Climate change caused the Alta forest fires, Co2 is a :pollutant ,etc. But, a science background would not in any way help her, the whole scam is not science based. Her talking points are prepared by Butts and others, she is simply the mouthpiece. I suspect when the serious Constitutional fight gets underway she may get the hook for someone more diplomatically inclined.
    Still if Jr can be PM, what difference does it make if any cabinet members have experience relevant to their portfolios? There is no department yet, of drama or snow boarding and he is firmly in control of the Liberals.
    The more she explains the more apt the nickname becomes.

  7. Based on what I have learned about climate science, and climate scientists … she is eminently qualified to discuss global warming. Anyone who can create a chart with exaggerated scales, manipulate data, and issue frightening public pronouncements … is … well … a … climate scientist.

    Hell, a railroad engineer (train driver) is head of the UN IPCC

  8. Linking Fort Mac fires to climate change was pretty awful. At best, there’s a incredibly low statistical chance of climate change causing a very slight increase in the risk of fires globally, but only if their models are correct – and the models haven’t been reliable. In reality, the risk of any X weather/climate event being caused by human CO2 emmissions is within the margin of error, in the noise, of computer models because there’s too many variables to measure, too much not understood, too much uncertainty.

    What CAGW alarmists are doing is a much older form of persuasion. It’s a religious/pagan pre-science argument. The holy men blame God’s wrath, witches, sinful behaviour, comets, whatever for crop failures, volcanic eruptions, drought, floods, etc. It’s an oldie but a goodie.

    To continue from yesterday’s discussion, if True Believers really feared droughts, floods and fires they’d advocate for concrete, no regret solutions. Reservoirs for water management and irrigation , clearing trees and making firebreaks around vulnerable communities, real solutions. A tax, like a religious tithe, does nothing to fix this problem.

    1. “…but only if their models are correct – and the models haven’t been reliable …”

      There’s nothing wrong with their models – they are computerized, after all. It’s just that the actual climate keeps getting itself wrong.

      1. I wish that were a joke but climate scientists actually do have a bad habit of “adjusting” data to fit the models. From NOAA taking out The Pause right before an important climate meeting, to lowering historical temps to exaggerate the warming acceleration slope, to adjustments in temperature stations that reliably turn stasis or cooling into warming, unauthorised IPCC revisions. When adjustments and errors are always biased in one direction, to warming, it’s difficult to not assume data tampering. Especially with the replication crisis and unethical research methods uncovered in so many other academic disciplines.

    2. Linking Fort Mac fires to climate change was pretty awful.

      No, it isn’t. Doesn’t everyone know that it was climate change that caused Red Rachel, et. al. to cancel the water bomber contracts, those same water bombers that might have reduced the damage to the Fort Mac area?

      I am being sarcastic, of course, but I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if the Alberta Dippers use a similar excuse to justify their ineptitude. Personally, I think they wanted the fires to burn down the oil sands plants, hoping that rebuilding them would be too expensive and, therefore, would have to be abandoned.

      1. The NDPs dislike of rural areas is obvious. During the NDPs rule in Sask., one of their MLAs defended lack of road repairs to small communities by saying there was more traffic in her back alley in the city. A rural MLA was quick to remind her that government neglect resulting in poor condition of rural roads was a safety issue, it was a moral duty to have passable roads because those roads were essential to get children safely to school, police to crime and ambulances to hospitals.

        It’s difficult to remember that the NDP has its origins as a western, rural protest party dedicated to equality and fairness.

        1. “It’s difficult to remember that the NDP has its origins as a western, rural protest party dedicated to equality and fairness.”

          FYI, it was always a lie. All you ever need to know about socialism is in ‘Animal Farm’.

          1. “All you ever need to know about socialism is in ‘Animal Farm’.”, and Ralph is our Squealer.

    3. next you’ll state that a flood to the height of covering Mt Everest is BS!!!!!

  10. Climate change is a given, it’s as old as planet earth, Greenland was once green. Gore told us we were all going to fry, we had global warming, that didn’t prove to be happening so now it’s just climate change.
    We dare not utter a word to the contrary, Barbie will not be pleased, “like you know” she won’t have any time for us mere folks , neither will she and her ilk have an excuse to tax the hell out of us….it’s more about tax than reality.

    Ontario is an example of green stupidity, we are paying higher and higher prices for everything we need to survive in this modern world. We need to be smart enough to boot out the extremists, sadly we are not there yet.

  11. Shouldn’t Canada be advocating for global warming? I mean, sure, a Mexican government that believed in it might be worried.

    But Canada? I mean, that’d be like Siberians saying “we don’t need none of that fancy above-freezing city-folk weather ’round these parts, no sirree”.

  12. still completely NOTHING about the chirese WIPING OUT *any* ‘gains’ on CO2 emissions via their 100s of COLD FIRED generators.

    not a peep.

    from ANY ideologue, pol party, mp, leader, pundit wtfEVER.

    not a peep.

  14. Sick of this stuff. We would have had all this a lot sooner, if Monsieur Kyoto Dion spoke ” da betttter ha-Englissshh! Maybe Harper didn’t do what he should have in some portfolios, (like C.B.C.) when he had a majority, but , at least, he left Canadians alone to work and live. This bunch is Obama in Canada! We’ll just have to tell them to shut the eff up and go blow, next election. Give them the Duffy Duffy Duffy ad infinitum treatment. I hate those fkers!

  15. It’s almost unfair attacking barbie. You gotta tie one hand behind your back and leave you brain in a jar – in the fridge…freezer.
    She is thick.
    Pathetic.

    1. Thick like that Canadian Tire Ice Block pickup truck?

      or that Jethro Tull song?

  16. Time for Alberta to use the Clarity Act to push for a better deal. Alberta does OK once in a blue moon when the libs are out of favor in Quebec. The rest of the time we are the country’s debit machine and embarrassing cousin all rolled into one. I’m sick of being polite to this eastern (and now Western) gaggle.

  17. Since she claims to be the “Minister of Weather”, does that mean she has meteorological powers and, thereby, has divine characteristics? If so, she’d be in distinguished company as the only person I heard of who could calm storms also had the ability to walk on water.

  18. The problem with turdo la doo and all his ministers is that their arrogance, narcissism, and fundamental dishonesty prevents them from acknowledging the obvious: they owe their present situation to one thing – a vote by the shallow, for the shallow.

    I mean, what a collection – a true theatre of the absurd: liars, crooks, incompetents, and outright fools….led by a simpering fop as Prime Mincer.

  20. These cardboard cutouts that masquerade as Ministers of Whatever don’t worry me so much, it’s the ones behind the scenes that do. They line ’em up & give them their talking points, in Climate Barbie’s case those working in her department. For T2 it’s Butts & Sorearse et al, along with every commie from China through Norkville & points west to the EU.

    Another Harper error was not firing everybody from a deputy minister to the mid level out the door as soon as he took office. These depts would still function without the middle & up, because that’s just how bureaucracy flows. The real Minister then runs the place according to party mandates. If you select the right people, with the right background things should just tick along. The Minister doesn’t even need to be a political person. Hire a friggin’ manager from private sector, if you need to. Then ditch the “hiring agency” (the union) & hire direct. It’s not rocket science.

  21. I see this dates from last year,however it is clear the writer was listening to Climate Barbie.
    Her bragging about her ignorance at the start of her ministry, is only compound by her obvious inability to grasp anything beyond the talking points.
    Now she announces her desire to not be addressed by any doubting peons.
    How dare you question me,who do you think I am?
    Minister of the Environment or something?
    Bastille Day comes to mind,every time I hear these Fools and Bandits speak.

  23. The whole climate debate farce will be proven to be the fraud it is, but time is in the essence!!!! Dr. Kari Mullis puts it best in his book , “Dancing Naked in the Mind Field”! Then all that have put mankind in peril, like Catherine Mackenna will be forced into the light!! Let’s hope it’s not too late!

    1. Keith…it HAS Been PROVED a Total FRAUD…..by none other than two top execs at the UN’s IPCC.

      Christina Figueres
      Ottmar Edenhofer

      Both of whom have publicly stated that Climate Change per se has squat to do with the environment and everything to do with changing the Worlds Economic Model of the past 150 years. Hmmm, Seems pretty CRYSTAL F’n CLEAR to me..??? Globalism as the thin veneer for a full on push to Marxism. All started by Maurice Strong & Power Corp, now Led by them and your other usual suspects…

      One must ask oneself why it is that ONLY (for the most part), Western Nations that have been saddled with inefficient and for the most part USELESS Renewables that have done ZIP for the so called environment (except to destroy it), and everything to take electricity prices to 7-10 times their nominal value…and who benefitted eh..?? Leftist-Liberal-Marxist Insiders in those very industries.

      We Are Being boned up the (_i_) by these SOBs … time for a freaking revolution. Been around long enough to know when I’ve been screwed over…. These liberal F’krs are Criminals – Traitors and to me should end up like Ceaucescu…hanging on a meat hook. Justin (aka Marie Antoinett), Trudeau being first in line…..(that I would live to see the day….priceless)

      1. You just summed up exactly what it is all about. Climate Barbie is just one of the front people stooges.

  26. Think of the people in her riding who voted for her.

    There’s dumb. And then there’s dumber.

  27. Her comments would explain why her PhD thesis, which reaches the earth-shattering conclusion that you can’t predict the weather in Scotland, has been cited exactly twice, and those citations coming from other enviro-loons.

  28. Lemon,
    Except Stan Laurel was more hilarious and less stoned, at least in that photo you show of him! She is on meds!

  29. Why should we be surprized that she knew nothing about cliimate. After all she was given the job by a man who is totally ignorant about running a country.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation