Cite This Article: “Distribution of earthquake activity in mountain area based on embedded system and physical fitness detection of basketball”
Cite This Article: “Distribution of earthquake activity in mountain area based on embedded system and physical fitness detection of basketball”
This is not peer reviewed yet but. . .
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353750912_Analysis_of_all-cause_mortality_by_week_in_Canada_2010-_2021_by_province_age_and_sex_There_was_no_COVID-19_pandemic_and_there_is_strong_evidence_of_response-_caused_deaths_in_the_most_elderly_and_in_y
Em, I think I have been saying that for sometime now.
But, but, but, it’s all about the science right, right, right?
Scientists are INFALLIBLE, nothing to see here! Damn deplorables and your obsession with truth…
ANY publication that doesn’t capture and eliminate these OBVIOUS piles of offal … doesn’t deserve to publish. When the TITLE alone screams BULLSHIT!!!! … it seems that the very FIRST person who took-in this entry would summarily reject it.
Don’t worry, AI will solve this problem.
There’s got to be at least a ten-goat penalty for each retracted paper, or this problem will never get fixed.
C’mon folks, you know their playbook – smash every institution. Science and journals are certainly on the burn list.
Only then can they I3uild I3ack I3etter….
but some of those titles were really, really great.