25 Replies to “Safe and Effective®”

  1. Just drove from Montana to Idaho where they sell Ivermectin over the counter – no prescription needed – $84.00 for a one week number of tablets.

    I’m ready for the next US Government financed Chinese Communist Flu.

    F.U. to Fauci, Baric, Daszak and all the Democrats for outlawing Ivermectin and many other effective cheap remedies during the “Fauci/CCP Flu.” You forced poisons on the populace like Remdesivir and your so called “vaccines.” Glad I and my family were smart enough to never get your jab. You are all evil, sick scum bags.

  2. Never mind the evidence!

    “The high respect for autonomy becomes particularly important when the certainty of the evidence is low or very low. In such circumstances, clinicians should work with patients to ensure that care reflects the experience, goals and priorities of those needing care — that is, their values and preferences,”

    #Dr.GordonGuyatt, ‘Mr.EvidenceBasedMedicine man.’

    But only when the issue is pediatric gender transition, not Covid. For Covid it’s “take the shot and shut up, peasants.” The NDPee is not big on personal autonomy and personal freedom, generally speaking.

  3. With 22 entire data points, this is not the type of study that you say “Ivermectin is helpful against COVID” but rather “Needs a far bigger study.”

    1. Meaning they are covering their asses….like the UK government is currently doing refusing to release their data for study. Not surprising…..in early 2022, the death rate from Covid among the double boosted jumped from 0% in week 1 to almost 75% by week 13 and was still climbing….in the same time,the death rate in the completely unvaxxed fell from about 25% to just under 10%. That was the last week the weekly UK vaccine surveillance reports were issued showing the death and new case rates by vax status and age.

    2. Well this is an Australian study, so I don’t think it’s got anything to do with the British government.

    3. “With 22 entire data points, this is not the type of study that you say “Ivermectin is helpful against COVID” but rather “Needs a far bigger study.””

      A study that you and your ilk would do your very best to obstruct, oppose and prevent from ever happening.

      1. I don’t have an ilk. I’ve gotta moose, a few deer, no ilk.

        But I had no idea your paranoia ran so deep. That is funny.

    4. Absolutely, need a large study. Wonder why that didn’t happen (or was suppressed, like this one was for 4 years) back in 2021? Maybe Thomas, below, has the answer.

      1. If you have to resort to conspiracy theories, you’re probably barking up the wrong tree.

  4. What’s the average age of those on the ‘wait list’? I strongly suspect they are Baby Boomer senior citizens. This just adds more to my conviction that the Canadian government will put the promotion of the MAID program into high gear because they simply don’t have the resources to adequately deal with this disastrous situation.

    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhe2fXw_DDz_YpDfa4q3uqZCYrMJpvVYSjtU-rIWqSu8UX9YhEhU_VS_aWDF8HN1bwRQJVgPATbWMxpIKWZ9Ei3etG1e1oDxeDsr4GQ2rnjlMk9vcCcxEy-mEwMTuzOWBCTMgvJs3H9Ppn6FeRTE3YcS51WFwZrAPqK6e291Z7zE5UOcHriqy_cDse5l_v1/s687/1%20sgdfgsdfgsdfg.jpg

  5. My wife had Covid 3 times. Each time I popped an Ivermectin for 6 days and never got it. I did have the first vax, my wife had many. I could easily be immune to start with but I like being self reliant.

    1. You might well have had it. For some people and some strains, COVID was asymptomatic. And the home tests were not reliable unless you put that swab right up into your brain.

      1. You might have had it even though you didn’t because you were asymptomatic.
        But you should have stuck a swab into your brain to reliably know.
        WHOA. Lethal Rodent has jumped the shark … but do a far bigger study and get back to us.
        Make sure it’s peer reviewed by the researchers who agree with those who fund them.
        Have a nice day.

        1. “Make sure it’s peer reviewed by the researchers who agree with those who fund them.”

          Exactly. It is *always* about the money…the ‘science’ is just the excuse they use to justify their continued employment.

      2. Surely for a ‘mucosal’ virus, you simply need to take a swab of mucus?
        And I thought PCR tests were “the gold standard”…….

  6. John Campbell started off well when he began posting videos explaining medical issues on YouTube. He was soundly on the side of science, and denounced shoddy arguments from internet quacks.

    But then he posted a video skeptical of COVID vaccines, and his YouTube views went through the roof. Since then he’s gotten weirder and weirder, pushing ever more dubious scientific (and sometimes historical) theories. It has no doubt made him a lot of money, but his reputation amongst anyone on the side of evidence-based medicine lies in ruins.

Navigation