Today it finally happened. Something I thought might never come, but I never quite gave up hope. The Mueller witch hunt has officially ended with the dismissal of the final indictment (setting aside the meaningless, for-show charges against a bunch of random Russians no one has ever heard of and no one will ever see anyway).
I’ve followed this case closely since 2018 because, even among all the injustices carried out by Mueller’s thugs, this one stood out as particularly grotesque. I’ll write more about it later, but in short: Mueller’s team went through General Flynn’s old client list and targeted one of his former clients on a matter that had nothing to do with Trump or Russia, purely to pressure him into saying something damaging about Flynn and by extension, Trump.
That client, @ekimalptekin, refused to lie. So Mueller’s team hit him with completely fabricated FARA charges. He couldn’t see his family or children for many years, fearing extradition to the United States. He spent millions on legal fees. His business, his life, everything was wrecked.
So I couldn’t be happier that Ekim’s long nightmare has finally ended. A huge thank you to everyone here who kept this injustice alive in the public eye all these years, especially my friend @FOOL_NELSON and everyone else in the Russiagate research community.
But most of all, thank you to Lindsey Halligan. What an absolute legend for getting this done in a matter of a few days after seven long years of despair. Having followed this case and the people involved extremely closely, I can say with absolute certainty that without Lindsey Halligan, this would not have happened. We all owe her a great debt of gratitude for finally, formally ending the Russiagate witch hunt.
4 Replies to “When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Oh don’t expect FBI to reimburse the millions in legal fees. Not without spending millions more.
Only in government can someone totally destroy another person and then say, “Oops! Oh shucky darn I was mistaken. Oh well, nobody’s perfect!” and then carry on as though nothing happened.
You mean like charging P. Diddy with everything under the sun … and your primary evidence is “cases of baby oil”? Then charging him for paying a woman to fly in to have an orgy? Gov’mnt PUHleeze!
L – Malicious Prosecution, proving the charge requires: 1. A lack of evidence that reaches proof beyond a reasonable doubt, yet proceeded with by the prosecuting attorney. This standard is high enough that it is an established standard. 2. The prosecutor’s manual also requires that the prosecution is in the public interest, not of an improper motive. This is more difficult to prove as it involves the mens rea, the intent of the guilty mind. But after proving, the first point. Why would a prosecuting attorney, a professional, deviate from standard practice is a logical question. Are there personal or ideological motives for which there is evidence e.i. Lawfare…
Even proving only the first part brings the prosecutor’s or possibly the entire Office of the Prosecutors into question. Because in either case bringing the administration of Justice into disrepute reduces the credibility of the Justice system, without which it can’t function in a British Common-Law nation.
I seem to recall that Flynn pled guilty because they threatened to arrest his somewhat wayward son for some old crimes that were ignored when they happened, but not statute barred yet. Comey is absolute scum of the earth.