7 Replies to “What Would We Do Without Experts?”

  1. Leftard language is not designed to convey information.
    It exists solely to gaslight people into believing absurdities, so that they may next commit atrocities.

  2. “Respect muh Authority”.
    The smaller the person,the greater their lust for power over others.
    Expert, has long been defined a “X” an unknown quantity.
    Spurt “A drip under pressure”.
    And they really did turn out to be classic Drips.
    Spineless followers of “The Mandate”.
    herdbeasts all the way down.
    “We are just following orders”.
    “Look what you made me do”.
    Hypocrisy and contradiction..all the way.

    Masks as specified are useless against a Corona Virus”.
    “Wear them masks”.
    6 Feet.
    Why?

    Save Grandma,cause we want the pleasure of offing her ourselves..come on Grandma get the jab,save your grandchildren.
    Two weeks to save healthcare..Turns out healthcare was already dead and toxic to those who came in contact.
    Next it will be,”Don’t blame us.sure we were wrong and damaged society immeasurably, BUT we meant well”..
    We did as we were ordered..
    “How were we supposed to know?”..
    We are the experts!
    Obey!

  3. L- Trust the experts is well written, logical and describes how former high trust societies
    became low trust ones. Read the comments section below it, about an interview with a senior surgeon, who would like to retire, His comments on current students would make a scary movie; one so scary Boris Karlof and Vincent Price would reuse to act in it.

  4. The problem is not the “experts”. The problem is the people who appoint and direct these “experts”.

    Just like with the Coronahoax and the moronic, anti-scientific lie of AGW, the desired results are predetermined. The game then becomes how to make these “experts” appear unbiased and rational to an unsuspecting public.

    But the purpose behind all such lies is to weaken and impoverish targeted people, and gaslight those who question the conclusions, while bolstering the views of the fools who swallow the tripe, aka progressives.

  5. In the same vein as my previous post, the issue is not with journalism but with the people who hire and police and fund the journalists.

    The problem is not with professors, but with the people who hire and police and fund those professors.

    The same problem exists for so many organizations where the people behind the scenes hire only those who will follow a specific agenda, and weed out those who won’t. They are the real problem.

    The people behind the curtain are the ones who actually rule over us, and the ones who must eventually be discovered and overthrown for us to ever experience positive change. Lashing out at their puppets accomplishes nothing.

  6. And the MSM continues to push ‘experts’ like Paul Ehrlich, who after 50+ years of front page, fearporn predictions has managed to maintain an impeccable batting average of .000…

Navigation