17 Replies to “Your Moral And Intellectual Superiors”

  1. Here’s a tip for legacy media: Maybe, just maybe if you printed actual facts and opinions that lined up with reality, and not your phoney version, you wouldn’t be regarded as a Pravda for a dying establishment.

  2. Just read a posting at BPR about the “leaked” war plans. Story was written by a well-known fabulist for The Atlantic – both of whom have been proven to be “Liars, Liars, Pants on Fire” in the past. That is the trouble with Liars, your past catches up with you like the boy who cried wolf and so you are eaten!

    1. Unfortunately, a lie will be three quarters around the world before the truth even gets out of bed.

      1. The C made a point of posting that lie below in Readers Tips. That’s because he’s currently pushing an anti-Trump narrative.

  3. Russia, India, they’re close enough.
    Putin, Modi, they almost sound alike and are probably the same guy.
    Right AP?

    Racist lying scum, the lot of them.
    ESADIAF

  4. I fondly remember a time, over 50 years ago, when what the AP said was gold.
    Now, if they had a dick, they would step on it.

    1. That’s because no one had the easy ability to call them out like we do now.

      I had a communist for a teacher; a Stalin groupie actually. He talked about how to manipulate through propaganda. Even in the 1970’s I saw how the “news” was not informing but trying to push a certain thought process. AP and everyone else were no better then than now. We just have the ability to call them out.

  5. Self canceling misinformation. That’s what FREE SPEECH delivers. It allows LIARS to self-cancel. See: MSNBC and CNN

  6. 1. Publish some bullshit story to drive and support a narrative.
    2. Let it marinate and be repeated by media acolytes so the plebes consider it an established fact.
    3. Don’t forget late night “comedians” as a vector for speading the BS since they reach more people than MSM.
    4. In the remote possibility you get called on it, deny, obfuscate and maybe, just maybe issue a correction on page E-19, in paragraph 12 of an article where the 11 previous para repeat the lie.

    1. “CTV news ad last fall.

      “We’re here to form your opinions”…..”

      The New York Times bragged about doing the same thing decades ago, and have been caught doing it more than once. People still seem to defend them as trustworthy, for some reason…

  7. I see Canada’s version of the deep state has weighed in on the election, claiming the Indians helped Pollievre get the leadership without his knowledge because he didn’t have clearance, as leaked to the Globe and Mail by CSIS. It would only be a mediocre deep state, as like everything Canadian it is mediocre. Dear little deep state bureaucrat, if you are reading this, please congratulate your wife on being the only woman in Canada who knows what Trudeau’s dick tastes like, second hand of course. Is there any mouthwash that will delouse you?

Navigation