46 Replies to “Best Canada Can Do Is Fentanyl”

  1. This needs to happen in Canada. I have written to my MP and also to Holland. No response. It is not clear why they are blocking access to Ivermectin.

      2. Abstract
        In 2015, the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine, in its only award for treatments of infectious diseases since six decades prior, honoured the discovery of ivermectin (IVM), a multifaceted drug deployed against some of the world’s most devastating tropical diseases. Since March 2020, when IVM was first used against a new global scourge, COVID-19, more than 20 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have tracked such inpatient and outpatient treatments. Six of seven meta-analyses of IVM treatment RCTs reporting in 2021 found notable reductions in COVID-19 fatalities, with a mean 31% relative risk of mortality vs. controls. During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments. Reductions in deaths correlated with the extent of IVM distributions in all 25 states with p < 0.002. Sharp reductions in morbidity using IVM were also observed in two animal models, of SARS-CoV-2 and a related betacoronavirus. The indicated biological mechanism of IVM, competitive binding with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is likely non-epitope specific, possibly yielding full efficacy against emerging viral mutant strains.

        Keywords: COVID-19; H. pylori; SARS-CoV-2; ivermectin; spike protein.

        1. Yes, I heard ivermectin not only treats COVID but it prevents COVID and a slew of other diseases. But only if you triple the recommended dose. So don’t wait, every loyal reader of this website should start mainlining that ivermectin today!

          2. @MikeT:
            JSR may be an alias to trolls we all know and love around here… (/s, as if you couldn’t tell)

            btw… anyone hear from UnReal recently?

    3. 1. Holland is a vapid idiot. Won’t help.
      2. CBSA rabidly seizes packages from India. Why? Who knows.
      3. It’s safe. One of the 10 most important medications, according to the —-WHO—-. Yes, that one.
      4. It has many applications. Ignore the bots, their purpose is to deflect and distract.
      5. It’s showing promise in cancer treatment. That should not be ignored. Chemo is toxic and far from effective.
      Ignore the bots.
      Soon, it will be OTC in most states, just a return trip away.
      You can get in Canada, but it’s not obvious. Excuse me while I have my daily oats.

  2. They can put free Ivermectin in every box of Cracker Jacks. Still doesn’t help with COVID.

        1. That’s a newspaper article that doesn’t even list or link the “studies” mentioned. Therefore you are wrong.

          Hey, I don’t make the rules. But those are your rules.

      3. “India and several African countries have evidence to the contrary.”

        That’s true. Some ‘experts’ are now attempting to ‘walk back’ that evidence (for money, obviously) but very few people are still gullible enough to believe them…the Boy Who Cried Wolf now applies.

        (but then there is our very own Killer Marmot, who never saw an Official Version of anything that he didn’t immediately and enthusiastically embrace…)

        1. Well of course. Any result you disapprove of must mean the authors were bought off.

          In reality, the reason the Indian Council of Medical Research “walked back” those results was because a re-examination of the evidence showed that it didn’t support the efficacy of Ivermectin.

      1. You could have God arrive on earth and prolong life by a 1,000 years, resurrect every dead human since the beginning, and clear the ocean’s of all pollution and some would still say, Marx would do it better.

      2. Here’s a paper that was actually published in a journal, not just on the internet. Unlike your study, they were discerning so far as the quality of studies they included in their meta-analysis. In particular, they only included randomized controlled studies (RCT).

        https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924857924001663

        To quote…

        Ivermectin did not reduce hospitalization, all-cause mortality or adverse events when compared with controls.

        Ivermectin did not reduce mechanical ventilation, clinical worsening or serious adverse events and did not increase clinical improvement and viral clearance when compared with controls.

        1. You’d be the Russian guy quoting studies published in journals from the Soviet Union, rather than actual leaked information from the scientists forced to sign off on the lies being published by the KGB.

          2. If by “full-blown conspiracy theory”, you mean, “not admitted by the very liars pushing the lies in the same doctored medical journals that you site” then yes, you are correct.

            And simple.

    4. Nor does it help with bogeyman infestations.

      The best cure for an imaginary problem is turning off the CBC.

      1. Haven’t watched the CBC for decades, save for the odd sports program. It turns out that sometimes people’s beliefs are derived from evidence, not propaganda.

          2. I believe that viruses are as capable of causing disease as scabs are capable of causing wounds.

            And I have never claimed that bacteria doesn’t cause disease. That is well known, and easily testable and provable.

            The two are completely unrelated – one is real and the other is utter fiction.

    5. That’s funny Killer? My doctor I had for over thirty years said he’d give me Ivermectin for Covid, just not a preventive . He’s since died.
      Maybe he’s just not as smart as you. But he’s one person I was lucky to know.

  4. I guess I’m the contrarian on this issue (along with the usual propaganda “Vaccine” brigade)…but for different reasons, I’m sure. I don’t support any drugs over the counter. I’d draw the line at 500 mg of Tylenol. I don’t think most people have the discipline to self-medicate. I don’t think most people have the tools to use something as innocuous as vitamins properly. Hell, I don’t think a lot of doctors have the discipline and scruples to apply medications properly. All you need do is take a look at the abuse of opioids and over use of anti-biotics to see that.

      1. Yeah, maybe booze, smokes and pot should only be allowed under authorized guidance.

        If it just saves one stupid person from self-harm it’ll be worth it.

    2. Too many people over-medicate with weird pharma shite, thanks to the advice of their “doctors.”
      They would arguably be better off self medicating with tried and true nostrums, like whiskey and weed, coffee and cigs, and no TV.

      1. Well, I smoked pot as a youth, and now I still enjoy my booze, cigarettes and coffee. I stopped watching the TV many moons ago.

        I don’t take weird pharma shite under the advice of my doctor but I do take vitamins and certain supplements such as Quercetin and NMN after certain oldtimers I know mentioned them, after which I read up on them.
        .

        1. Lupus,
          We are basically on the same page.
          I also take daily vitamins and related things.
          Turmeric has done wonders for alleviating my arthritic issues.
          I am not familiar with the other things you cited.
          PS… I smoked weed in my youth, and continue to imbibe, daily, as it complements my booze, smokes, and lack of TV.
          Oh, and I frequent my local library and read widely. One librarian chick is sweet on me, even.
          All of which is to say…don’t sweepingly think that pot smokers are merely blunt liberal sheep.
          I don’t mean you, Lupus, just a general comment.

          I do, though, these days, enjoy episodes of Pete Santanello on you tube. Check him out.

          Excuse the ramble…just got some high test from my Indian buds.
          Have a nice day, and demand an election now.

    3. So what are you advocating? No drugs to anyone? Pharmacists are Gods? Doctors should not be in the medical profession? You’re kind of going in too many directions to track.

      Aside, I think allowing people to decide their ultimate fate in whatever manner, be it self prescribing, weapons, diet or smoking, is fine, as long as other people do not have to support the destructive habits.

    4. “I don’t think most people have the discipline to self-medicate.”

      How nice of you to make that decision for me, good sir.

      While you’re at it, why not make the Income Tax 100% and give to each according to their needs? Most people lack the discipline to manage their own money, after all. Better that you should manage it all for them, eh?

  5. Doctors in Canada are not allowed to prescribe ivermectin routinely for parasites unless they are an unusually virulent type. Instead they use pyrethrin or permethrin (chrysanthemum flowers) which rarely work. I knew someone who couldn’t get rid of scabies. He bought veterinary ivermectin and was fixed in one treatment. Veterinary use is now restricted, at least in Alberta, to registered farmers. The whole world uses ivermectin as the first line treatment, except for Canada.

    Using hydroxychloroquine as an antiviral wasn’t some insane experiment. Quinine was used as an anti-viral for well over 100 years. I have looked at tens of thousands of WWI soldiers’ files and the go-to treatment for Spanish Flu was Quinine.

    1. “Doctors in Canada are not allowed to prescribe ivermectin routinely for parasites unless they are an unusually virulent type. ”

      Yes, and pharmacists here in BC are also *not allowed* to fill any prescriptions for it even if they did. No one seems to even wonder why.

    2. I was able to obtain veterinary ivermectin “over the counter” at the local farm store, it was on sale for $6 CAD a syringe, all you had to do was state it was “For personal use” and they handed it over. Otherwise yes, you needed a farm number. My relative that was visiting from the usa at the time, bought some as well and took it home with him. This was during the peak of the pandemic.

  6. Ivermectin is almost as effective as doing absolutely nothing to cure someone of the Coronahoax. In fact the odds of survival using this method are 100%.

    When combined with vaccines, the odds drop precipitously, and immediately.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation