54 Replies to “Down The Primrose Path”

  1. Russia’s greatest threat is its nuclear arsenal. Cornering and antagonizing a bear is not the wisest thing to do.

  2. Before Trudeau commits Canadian boots to the ground, would someone send draft notices to Xavier and Ella-Grace. And Justin, too, for that matter. There are plenty of 50 year olds dying in Ukraine on both sides.

  3. FILTHY LIBERALS
    President Trump is evil for wanting Peace!
    Something drastic by President Trump will happen in response to these Dangerous Morons in UK.

    Expect Little Potato to copy/paste Idiot Starmer.
    FILTHY LIBERALS

  4. The price of dead Ukrainians is acceptable, not just to the Neocons, but also to Zelenskyy.

  5. What Mikey fails to grasp is that Russia is now Fully trained and manpower ready, plus their military production is war capable and has a higher rate than all nato countries combined. Plus Russia now has new capabilities, and possibly new stock piles of advanced weapons. Mikey is an idiot.

    1. Yes, depleting Russia’s capability and removing Putin from power was the goal, but they fail on both accounts.

    2. Such a superpower that they’re using donkeys, horses, and cheap Chinese electric golf carts across the front line.

      1. “Such a superpower that they’re using donkeys, horses, and cheap Chinese electric golf carts across the front line.”

        Wow…going Green in a war zone, but still winning? Is there nothing that Putin can’t do?

      4. Soldiers using whatever they can get their hands on.
        Wow.
        That’s never happened in the whole history of warfare.
        Ever.

  6. Stark admissions? Let us not forget the German newspaper interview with Angela Merkel where she flat-out stated that the West had no intention of living up to the Minsk Agreements and the whole point of the game was to buy time to build up Ukraine. Once you start looking into it, it is hard not to conclude this war was manufactured.

    1. More fake news. Toss it into the bin with NATO expansion, Johnson scuttled a deal, 9 year genocide, bioweapons labs,

      2. Nope. Merkel actually said that.

        https://www.reuters.com/world/putin-russia-may-have-make-ukraine-deal-one-day-partners-cheated-past-2022-12-09/

        “In an interview published in Germany’s Zeit magazine on Wednesday, former German chancellor Angela Merkel said that the Minsk agreements had been an attempt to “give Ukraine time” to build up its defences.
        Speaking on Friday at a news conference in Kyrgyzstan, Putin said he was “disappointed” by Merkel’s comments.”

        Try to keep up, shortbus.

        1. And some more:

          https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/09/us/politics/russia-ukraine-james-baker.html

          “Having said that, Mr. Gorbachev agreed that NATO expansion was unnecessarily provocative. “It was definitely a violation of the spirit of the statements and assurances made to us in 1990,” he said.

          “As it happens, one of those who suggested a different approach was Mr. Baker. In 1993, as NATO was contemplating admitting Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, he proposed in an op-ed in The Los Angeles Times that the alliance consider another possible member: Russia itself.”

          So you c**ks**kers spent 30 years aggravating the Russians. Now you are going to eat s**t as a result.

          We classical conservative types tried to warn you.

          1. Do I understand correctly from your post that your definition of “classical conservative type” is someone who wants to see the Ruϟϟischeschweinen regime in NATO?

            If yes, it means that everybody you define as a “classical conservative” is a certifiable idiot who thinks it’s possible to cure a rabid dog by admitting it into a pack of heathy dogs.

        2. AllanS has an annoying tendency to ignore inconvenient facts that goes against his world view.

          1. Well, that actually is a defining feature of 90% of the local inhabitants, so why do you pick him in particular?

        3. “Give Ukraine time” was about politics and the government, it wasn’t about the military. Go find the full quote.

          This is typical of Russian propagandists.

  8. OK. And what’s the exciting idea of depleting Russia’s armaments? To make it easier to invade Russia? So the LGBTQueer world order can eliminate the last European “homophobe”?

    Yeayyyy … *cough*. *cough*

    These people are mentally ill. No wonder they are normalizing the mentally ill trannies … to make this insanity appear … normal.

  9. Americans have died in this conflict, but clearly not enough to catch the attention of dim wits like this fellow. Yesterday I saw a video of three soldiers (sounded American) who were caught in an ambush and killed. Headcam of one of them told the tale. One source claimed it was Ukrainian special forces taking revenge for what they see as an American betrayal.

      1. I heard it was Notre Dame, DCH, but Ohio State beat them, so now Russia is eyeing the Buckeyes as the next place to invade.

  11. “I can’t think of a better military investment than spending $175B to eliminate half of Russia’s military capacity without a drop of US blood.”

    This is just terrible. Spending $10B to eliminate three quarters would be way better.

  12. A year or so back,one of the Alex’s of The Duran,made the point that foreign troops,NATO troops were already dying in this conflict.
    The “Tell” he said would be hidden on the obituaries.
    Where military personnel would die in,Skiing accidents,car crashes,you name it..that their deaths would not be acknowledged in their home countries,denying their families both benefits and knowledge.
    How would we know?
    As for setting up the Ukrainian Grunts?
    They did not even pretend to hide it.
    “We will fight to the last Ukrainian”.
    And when Dear Leader and its ilk ;”Have your back”.
    You know betrayal will follow.

  13. This shit show is beyond stupid. HELLO ! ….. government’s have no money, it’s taxpayers money. They can’t even issue war bonds because they are not actually at war. They have your wallet and gave it to zelensky!

  14. Russia: “Don’t do this thing. We will consider t an act of war, and respond accordingly.”
    NATO: “We must do this thing to stop Russian aggression.”

    1. Exactly! There’s a REASON Trump didn’t want to give Zelenskyyyy “security guarantees”, read: boots on the ground and air cover. That is a defacto NATO occupation of Ukraine. In every other war, the State Dept. would be running around with their hair on fire for such a bellicose and provocative move. But in this war against a “homophobic” world leader? Who cares … let the nukes fly!!

  15. Biden Destroys Civilization.
    Attempting to park NATO on Russia’s border will forever be ranked as the dumbest action in Western history. Even the sniveling, cowardly withdrawal from Afghanistan ranks second.

    1. The sniveling, cowardly withdrawal from Afghanistan was Trump’s policy. Sure, Biden’s handlers screwed up the mechanics of it, but the wider inevitable result of the (Pakistani)Taliban crushing the pseudo-Afghan government was baked in by Trump’s naive perception of realpolitik powerplay as mere business dealings. Biden saved Trump from the consequences of his own folly.

      NATO has been on Russia’s border for over a quarter of a century. Nothing bad happened to Russia except the crimping of its re-expansion plans. Boo hoo.

  17. I truly hope that Elon’s gutting of USAID was just practice for taking on the MIC.

  18. Russia wanted the war. And it got the war it wanted. Of course it did not go the way they wanted.

  20. Born: San fransisco
    Indoctrination: Georgetown University, Edmund G. Walsh school of foreign service.
    Co-Founder: The Lincoln Project
    Divorced: Wife of 10 years after 3 children.
    Status: Loser

  21. At what point does the Turd, extradite migrate Ukrainians that fled to Canada? They all seem to want the fighting to continue, they’re all still wearing their pins and flying the blue and yellow.
    They all seem to want Canada/west to contribute more. Maybe all the men and women should be back in Ukraine, to take up the battle themselves ?

    1. Leave the pole dancers please, some of them are pretty hot, and they have “flexible” morals. just sayin 😉

  22. It’s not just him. All of these politicians think like that with maybe the exception of Trump himself. They are psychopaths. Been like that forever.

    That video of the poor guy with Downe’s syndrome was heart breaking. Who treats someone like that? Evil.

    Whatever course of life takes you down the path of caring so little for human life, I hope I never encounter.

  23. Look up Mike Madrid:

    “In 2020, Madrid co-founded the Lincoln Project, a Republican anti-Trump organization that became one of the most successful Political Action Committees in US history. ”

    Guess the phrase “most successful” has a different meaning from what they are saying here.

  24. Bang for bucks? What’s a Ukie life worth? Depends.
    Discrepancies in the numbers (Trump is throwing around a millions number):

    “””Vladimir Zelensky claimed the armed forces of Ukraine has lost 45,100 service members as dead. In his words, around 390,000 cases of injuries were reported. Some service members were injured multiple times, he added.”””

    “”According to the Russian defense ministry, Ukraine’s losses in 2022 amounted to around 118,500 servicemen, and in 2023 – to around 405,400 servicemen…Kiev lost some 595,000 troops as killed or wounded in action in 2024, which exceeds the combined casualty figures of the special operation’s first two years.”” (loss=killed or wounded)

  25. The basic premise of this post is wrong. There is no “finally saying the quiet part out loud”. The “value for money” angle has been a pro-defending-Ukraine line from near the get go. And it’s brutally true, whichever side you think is justified.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation