Remember that the payroll is crawling with Islamists and it all makes sense.
The BBC has been accused of “whitewashing” the views of participants in its controversial Gaza documentary after repeatedly mistranslating references to “the Jews” and omitting praise of “jihad”.
The Telegraph can reveal that on at least five occasions the words Yahud or Yahudy – Arabic for “Jew” or “Jews” – were changed to “Israel” or “Israeli forces”, or were removed from the subtitles altogether.
An interviewee praising Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas leader, for “jihad against the Jews” was also mistranslated as saying he was fighting “Israeli forces”.
The BBC is under pressure to reveal whether taxpayers’ money was given to Hamas during the making of Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone.
Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said that if the BBC finds evidence money was given to Hamas, then counter terror police should investigate.
Asked whether the Met Police should investigate, she said: “We know that it is illegal to give money to terrorist organisations. Hamas is a terrorist organisation. The Met would make its operational decisions.
“I think that the BBC certainly needs to investigate and get the evidence for what has or what hasn’t happened, and then the police can make a decision on that. But we know what is right and what is legal in our country, and giving money to terrorists is not it.”
The same country that gave lifetime known rapist Jimmy Saville a personal office room in the biggest hospital for troubled girls so he could rape his way through the patients?
The same country that is currently holding in solitary confinement the only journalist that will dare investigate and talk about the official cover up of thousands of young girls that have been raped and murdered by hundreds of terrorist supporting parasites over the last 40 years?
Sure, that’ll happen.
Exactly. And it makes no difference if they are devout Roman Catholics like Saville or muslims like the replacement population being imported by those behind the curtain.
The goal is oppression and replacement of the native populations using any means necessary.
BBC rec’d my American taxpayer monies from USAID. I WANT MY MONEY BACK.
Weird how despite there supposedly being sovereign nations, the wealth of the most productive nations (comprised of historically white, productive, non-socialist peoples) flows across borders regardless. And bleeds the wealth away from those who produce to those who don’t. Artificially propping up otherwise 3rd world basket cases, and funding subversive groups everywhere else.
Almost as though this isn’t done by accident, and whose primary purpose isn’t to enrich corrupt officials although that most certainly occurs.
Bleeding heart white people look at disparities between what we enjoy and what third-world populations have and think that we can “share” our advantages .. ignoring that those societies lack the ethos to build upon what is given. Look at RSA.
Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said that if the BBC finds evidence money was given to Hamas, then counter terror police should investigate.
__________________________________________________
This is why the “conservatives” of the UK are useless. First, she accepts the BBC policing themselves and expects a corporate media entity to report themselves for penalty and punishment if their investigation shows malfeasance. Then, she states that law enforcement should investigate should the perpetrator say it’s OK with them.
What should have been done: Those with reason to believe the BBC funded terrorist organizations should have immediately gone to law enforcement and reported it. Then, en masse, conservative “leaders” should have leaned on law enforcement to do their jobs without any interference by the BBC. Failure to follow up on this alleged crime should be publicized and used by the Conservatives as a policy point in future elections. It’s like the “conservatives” in the UK want to lose, be ineffectual, and not have the responsibility of their label.
If the “conservative” party in the UK were actually instead a controlled opposition party, whose purpose was to generate the appearance of an opposition without actually countering the ruling party, then this would make a lot of sense.
Kinda like in every other western nation, including Canada.
Ever notice that when an actual conservative party is formed, all of the other parties attack it. And no one attacks it harder than the supposedly conservative party. Both Reform and Wildrose come to mind. In those instances CINOs Joe Clark and Jesuit Jason Kenney led the attacks.
Ever notice that when an actual conservative party is formed, all of the other parties attack it. And no one attacks it harder than the supposedly conservative party.
-___________________________________
THAT is a fantastic point.
This is what your $200 yearly “TV License” in Britain pays for.
But at least you can opt out, although the UK court system is awash with people charged with watching TV without a license.
If only Canadians had the same choice. Instead, we all pay for the 2% who actually watch the CBC.