Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Don't Run
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
To which I would reply…
“No kidding, Sherlock!”
Now here is an example of prudery spoiling art. The alliteration is what makes “no shit, Sherlock” witty. To abandon it to avoid rudeness is to allow virtue to erase merit. I know you act from sincere motives as an honest Christian, and I rather admire you for it, but should a Christian conscience be satisfied with the suppression of merit by virtue? Should they not enhance each other rather than conflict?
The coming Poilievre government is going sell off the CBC, right? Just like previous governments have sold off the national oil company, the national railway and the national airline, right?
If they don’t, they’re showing why they’re known as the stupid party.
Or they’re just the Party of Kang, taking over after years of mis-rule from the Party of Kodos.
Keeping people on the reservation through their belief in the power of the people via (s)elections.
Well, CTV had an ad last fall that stated that they weren’t there to inform us with the news, but to use the news to shape our opinions.
And your typical CTV didn’t even perceive anything wrong with that statement. Also, CBC viewers and listeners won’t find out about the ombudsman statement, because of course the CBC would never report it.
Unwise is not the word I’d use.
And confirmation bias is what Liberal Leftard’s live for and why freedom scares them so.
Jack Nagler tells us not to rely on CBC News for the full story. Brave words upon his retirement, but he has been MIA for many of his 34 years at the Corpse. I wrote to Mr Nagler a few years ago regarding the “Being Black In Canada” banner on their news site showing five fists raised in the Black Power salute of the sixties. Mr Nagler said he did not ‘have the authority to remove the banner” and suggested writing to their news boss Brodie Fenlon. I did so and got a flannelling response that did nothing to inspire confidence in the news service. I wish Mr Nagler well in retirement but wish he’d shown more courage earlier in his career.
It’s an expensive propaganda arm of the left and now opposed to the current direction of the electorate. It has almost no viewers and it is paid for by those who choose not to watch it. It is like a mangy deer flopping around on the roadside after being hit by someone without the morality and courage to put it out of its misery.
I don’t have to look to know CBC sucks a big one.
And in other news, ‘a lit match burns’.
I once got a response from him that he needed my full name/address/phone number in order to investigate an article that was objectively wrong, and completely misrepresented the quote in question, replacing important context with a “…”
So he’s just another hack
Here is the report that Blacklock’s is referring to:
https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/ombudsman/reviews/Deep_Dive
I just red the summary part, but it says that, in ever-so-genteel terms, readers ought to check other sources of information other than relying solely on CBC news. It also says that news ought to start checking on alternate points of view. But other than that, the report shoelace-kisses his pay-masters.
The new CBC news ombudsman:
https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/ombudsman
The CBC ombudsman complaint process has been crappy anyways.
The CBC Ombudsman is just a fancy word for “CBC Senate Seat”
For years I thought an “ombudsman” was a Buddhist who smoked dope.
… Jack Nagler tells 40 million Canadians, who lost trust in the CBC approximately 34 years ago, not to trust the CBC now that he’s received his golden shower, er gold watch. But continue funding it so we go bankrupt financially and morally. Take your advice Jack and shove it where your co-workers play.
It’s a public secret.
Everybody that’s interested in the affairs of men knows that.
None the less there are still hundreds of thousands that think the tv station is the best.
It remains to be seen what is the next prime minister going to do about that.
Socialist government broadcasts the news it paid for. Surely this is not unexpected.