53 Replies to “Decisive”

  1. Such a relief to be honest. Charest was resoundingly rejected. We’ve now identified every single turncoat libtard too.

    1. The reporting is Charest at 16% and Lewis at 9% but that is the weighted method. In raw votes Charest and Lewis tied at 11%.
      And PP got 71% raw votes.

  2. I voted for Leslyn Lewis because, she was one of the first MPs to visit the trucker’s convoy, I have a great sense of humor, and according to Trudeau I’m:

    “racist, misogynist, Nazi extremist, have unacceptable views, and we shouldn’t tolerate the unvaccinated” 🙂

    Clearly the current occupant of the PMO is off his political hobby horse rocker and should be mercilessly mocked for severe stupidity.

    I wish Pierre well in his endeavors…to unseat the trust fund man-child.

    Cheers

    Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

    1st Saint Nicolaas Army
    Army Group “True North”

    1. Consider that Lewis only got nine percent of the vote.

      If people would rather vote in a Liberal wash-out, the Tories are not conservative.

      1. @Osumashi

        You are clearly referring to the CINO/RINO uni-party element as embodied in Jean Charest.

        Yes I have “low tolerance” for washed out failed Liberal leaders… 🙂

        Cheers

        Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

        1st Saint Nicolaas Army
        Army Group “True North”

      1. Agreed, OK. Her messages throughout the campaign had that same grace and style. The one candidate who attacked her openly (Scott A.) finished dead last, and I am guessing that going after her in the way he did contributed to that dismal finish.
        It would be interesting for someone in the CPC to tabulate who had the most #2 votes. The numbers are there, and are easy to tabulate.

        1. She was also the actual brave one who supported the convoy before it became “fashionable”.

  3. I’m sticking with Max but I hope these two can re-unite the right, just without globalists or Toronto corporate types running that merger. We’ll see if PP can stay true to his ideals, or if he will prove to be just another false dawn. At least we know for sure what Max stands for, and we need to keep that focus so the CPC has something they can either embrace or reject, with the appropriate political consequences.

      1. “Bait and switch splitting the vote”? Exactly so. It’s what kept Jean Chretien in power for a decade amid the ruins of a divided Progressive Conservative Party after Mulroney. We’ve already seen what a useless knob Max Bernier was after his terms as a Harper cabinet minister. Bernier was completely useless as a Minister, achieving utterly nothing in all his cabinet positions.

        What Max stands for? Hah! He’s a bag of wind indulging in a pure vanity ploy. He lost the leadership contest to Andrew Scheer and directly splitting the conservative vote, resulting in razor-thin losses to Justatwit in the 2019 election. What is amusing is all the supposed conservatives who take this windbag seriously.

        1. Tell me what decades of “pragmatic” voting has done?

          Oh, yes – handed Pierre’s idiot-boy the prime minister’s office.

          Canadians got neither the social nor fiscal conservative candidate.

    1. Max often says things I like to hear. Please point out anything he has actually done to advance a just cause. You may say he never had the opportunity, but he did.
      When he was industry minister, PSKnight asked him for help when the courts allowed CSA to take our laws unto themselves as their own exclusive property. He failed to even reply! This failure to do his ministerial duty to point out corruption, defines him. I will not consider forgiving him until after he has confessed…. Don’t worry, I won’t be holding my breath.

  4. There is no doubt that he has coast-to-coast support from the party faithful. Quite impressive how he kicked Charest’s ass in Quebec.

    It’s healthy for democracy to have clear choices.

    He’ll have to fight the media. Harper and Trump showed it can be done!

  5. From what I have seen and heard, he is well capable of taking it to the left and the media. As long as he keeps poking at them he will eventually get under their skin and then the unraveling will begin. Congratulations to P.P. Steve O

  6. Our mainstream media will be eating each other trying to develop fake stories to toss into the news to see what might possibly stick.
    Nothing to see that’s different with the what is their normal operational procedures.

  7. Face it. Peter Pea-rabbit won because he figured it was to his immediate advantage to sound more like Max than sounding like Scheer-the-steer or Pinky no’tool.

    1. Yup. Pierre played the cons, neocons and pcons like a master angler reeling in a ravenous blue marlin with all of the attendant leaping and splashing and cheering. Well played sir, well played.
      However, I saw a straight-up genuine understanding and a commitment to oppose/dismantle the main tumorous establishment of socialism in Canada, with all of its metastatic malignancies, in the eyes, words, constancy and the quiet yet resilient comportment of Roman Baber; and I think that was something that a lot of people either ignored or failed to notice and appreciate.
      Pierre Trudeau and his devil spawn also rode the waves of the Liberal Trudeaumanic camp with flash and panache.
      I hope that Roman Baber and Maxime Bernier, with patient work ethic and calloused hands like the classical outport Newfoundlander hauling in the cod and the lobster traps, will continue their important work to represent the equally classical small-c conservative Canadian.
      Time will tell with PP, as it did with his predecessors.

  8. To all the PP naysayers, let me just make this clear. You can support Justin Trudeau and the LPC by sitting on your hands during the next federal election, because CINO or it isn’t Leslyn Lewis or whatever other reason, or by throwing your vote away by going PPC, which will never, ever seat a single MP in the HoC. Politics is the art of the possible. If you hold out for the impossible or disengage, you’re effectively supporting Trudeau.

    Now go back to your habitual negativity.

    1. Spot on. Liberals and commies will vote for their candidate regardless of what they might do that is disgusting (see Bill & Hillary and see Jack Layton).
      They don’t care if another parties candidate cured Covid or cancer or every other malady known to humans. They would stiil vote for their candidate. They’re insane but happy to do that.

    2. “Pragmatic” voting is what go us here to begin with.

      People would rather vote for Charest than Lewis. A washed-up Liberal was preferable to a socially conservative black woman’s opinions.

      Because “possible”.

  9. Had Charest won there would have been an immediate swelling sentiment for independence in western Canada.
    This had to be adverted.
    Pray P.P. Words don’t prove hollow.

  10. Anyone who doubts Pollievre’s resolve to stand against UN tyranny, remember, he was the only one who voted against the Paris Accord.

    Wait, what’s that you say? He voted with the Liberals and NDP on it. Hmmm. Oh well. Hopefully he’s solid on everything else. I’m sure he has our backs. At the very least, let’s hope he’s slightly less worse than the guy we got now.

    Sorry for the pessimism. Had the football pulled away too many time I guess. Carry on.

    1. Nice Charlie Brown reference. I said the same thing months ago when PP announced his run for the leadership.

      I will say that I’m relieved. I was on record of saying that if PP DID NOT win on the first ballot, he could be in for a spot of trouble in the rank balloting/points system.
      So there you go. He won… he won DECISEVLY, and I am happy about that.
      NOW let’s see what PP will do now that he has the reins. Will he “pivot” as so many of his predecessors did INCLUDING Harper? Will he try, as the conservative party consultant Glenn McGregor on CTV (fake)News tried to suggest, and PIVOT to the left to “appease to more Canadians,” now that he’s won over his base, like the Tool man did before him?
      Or will he stick to his guns, and give the lie-beral media the finger, which is what I’m hoping he will do, but as you said, I too had the football pulled away from me too many times, so we shall see if PP is for real, or if he’s just another CINO like the Tool.

      As for me, I’m sticking with the PPC. You see, the combined CPC/PPC vote in my riding was still not enough to overtake the safe liberal incumbent in the last election, so really, I’m not taking any risk of splitting the vote. What I am doing is try to give the PPC as many popular votes as possible, so that they can qualify for more federal funding as a legitimate political party. Everyone else here has to assess their own ridings and take that into consideration when voting strategically. Which means that yes, I am conditionally endorsing the CPC with PP as the new leader, where the votes really count, provided he doesn’t take an abrupt left turn in the next election… if we even make it to the next election. Something tells me that the turd might try to find a new “emergency” that will give him justification to… well… You know…

    2. I’m disappointed that he supports supply management, too. At least he didn’t drink milk during his acceptance speech to show that the fix was in.

  11. So his first step will be to get rid of the braintrust that ran the last few elections, and put his people in place…

    right?

    1. Hopefully so; do they work for him or the Conservative Party? I’m still not clear on how they organize the hierarchy.
      I see some backroom brawling in the near future; the mandarins aren’t going to go quietly.

  12. In other (good) news, it looks like there will be a new government in Sweden.
    The right side leads 176-173 over the left (MPs), with a 0.9% vote count lead (should mean no bad surprises).
    The “populist” Sweden Democrats is now the second largest party with 20.7% of the vote.

  13. Just because Pierre won doesn’t mean much yet. We need to keep the pressure up on provincial sovereignty

  14. I do remember the misplaced trust the west put in Mulroney. He said all the “right” things too.

  15. The Canadian media specifically instructed you stupid hicks not to vote for Poilievre. Such a blatant disregard for the op-eds of this country’s hard working progressive journalists can only be considered an abuse of democracy.

  16. 321 democracy is in danger and the liberals need to change all the rules to protect it.. its actually getting kind of boring..

  17. NDP Members of Parliament have a chance to stay relevant or follow Justin’s Liberals off a cliff, which would be amusing too.

    But they’re likely too dumb to make a move, their leader is certainly a dumbstick.

  18. There was a female politician who spoke in support of the truckers before almost anyone. Can’t remember her name. What happened to her. Forgive me, as an American, it’s all I can do to keep up with Xiden and his cabal at this point in time.

Navigation