13 Replies to “Its Ok To Burn Books On Turtle Island”

  1. Heinrich Heine had something to say about book-burning:

    “Dort, wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man am Ende auch Menschen.” (“Where they burn books, they will, in the end, burn human beings too.”)

    1. Book burning is a … “gesture of reconciliation”? Well, TBF that’s pretty much the same thing Adolf practiced. He “reconciled” a country that had been overrun by Joos. He “reconciled” a German economy that had been beat down by Joos. Adolph seized the homes, shops, and businesses that had been “stolen” by the Joos in a serious “gesture of reconciliation”. And in the ULTIMATE “gesture of reconciliation” … Adolph gassed those interloper Joos.

      “We bury the ashes of racism, discrimination and stereotypes in the hope that we will grow up in an inclusive country where all can live in prosperity and security,”

      Adolph buried the ashes of many books … and many Joos. And the Arians were never discriminated against by those troublesome Joos anymore. Why can nobody see where this Hatred and self-loathing is headed?

  2. I’m going to do a bit of devil’s advocate.
    The premise is that the responsibility for residential schools are individuals that should be named, shamed, and expunged from history.
    If this is the case consider the following.
    At the time of Sir John A the practice of using methods such as this to integrate natives into western culture was accepted practice. That’s not a point I wish to argue, because I’m going on the premise that the practice (residential schools) is deemed to be the wrong committed regardless.
    My point is this.
    If Sir John A MacDonald is deemed guilty during a time when this practice was standard procedure, why are those prime ministers that allowed the practice to continue when said practice was known to be wrong excused from any responsibility?
    In 1870 residential schools where seen as a viable solution to a problem.
    In 1970 no one would advocate for such a thing.
    This would in my opinion make the PM in office in 1970 far more guilty of the so-called genocide than one in office in 1870.

  3. PM Shithead says on a personal level he wouldn’t burn books, but churches, that’s another thing.
    The book burners would get along well with the Taliban, no?

    1. Justin is playing it safe and pretending that the books he wouldn’t read are not deserving of such an incendiary end.

      And what kind of poseur burns books for “reconciliation”? One who doesn’t deserve to have a job that gives him three months off. That’s who.

  4. Canadians burning books.
    Nothing to see here move along
    Canadians are not fascist I’m told.

  5. How is burning books part of ‘reconciliation’? I would have thought they would want to burn the author at the stake, in a culturally appropriate way. After all, books can be reprinted.

    1. Add to that the culturally-correct insertion of cedar shims under the fingernails and set alight. Them Mohawks LOVED to torture their captives!

  6. They always have the noblest motives for their oppression. There’s so much love in their hearts when they remove your liberties for the public good and tax you for the honour.
    In fact, so much evil has been done for the ‘ public good ‘ that anyone who hasn’t caught on by now is a genuine fool.

  7. Have I not commented on NUMEROUS occasions that there were de-facto NAZI’s in the PMO..?? GM Butts himself for certain, Telford and PM Dickspank at a bare minimum.

    Book Burning
    Vaxports
    Mass Censorship
    Yellow Star of Daivid Shit.

    And financed by the same Globalist FILTH that did so in the 1930’s.

    Yea…tell me I’m nuts.

Navigation