38 Replies to “Nice hair, though.”

  1. It is $100 not $100M, M is reserved for gifts taxpayers give to Justine’s friends.

      1. JFK at least prevented a nuclear war. What’s Shiny Unicorn done that’s comparable? “Standing up to” Trump and snorting at him?

  2. That’s “$100”, not “$100M”…

    A hundred bucks – THAT’LL larn ‘im!

  3. I am just curious … did PM Sockeyebrow … INHERIT enough $$$$$ from daddy to cover the $100M fine ? Or did he save and invest enough of his dance instructing wages to cover it on his own ?

  4. It’s evidence that our conflict of interest laws are pathetic. The maximum penalty under the law is $500.

    1. “…penalty under the law is $500 ”

      The $500 is money that comes from taxpayers. These people don’t work. The fine should be $ 5000 and 48 hours in prison. They should be held to a higher standard, elitist as they are.

    2. The average traffic related ticket is around $100. So, apparently, the cost of influence pedaling is equal to the cost of a traffic ticket. Welcome to the “L”iberal wor”L”d of Canada. A conservative PM would have to resign.

  5. The Wall Street Journal has been taken over by Trump supporters…
    …and they are posting anti-global warming articles!

    Thirty Years On, How Well Do Global Warming Predictions Stand Up?

    “Thirty years of data have been collected since Mr. Hansen outlined his scenarios—enough to determine which was closest to reality. And the winner is Scenario C. Global surface temperature has not increased significantly since 2000, discounting the larger-than-usual El Niño of 2015-16. Assessed by Mr. Hansen’s model, surface temperatures are behaving as if we had capped 18 years ago the carbon-dioxide emissions responsible for the enhanced greenhouse effect. But we didn’t. And it isn’t just Mr. Hansen who got it wrong. Models devised by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have, on average, predicted about twice as much warming as has been observed since global satellite temperature monitoring began 40 years ago”

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/thirty-years-on-how-well-do-global-warming-predictions-stand-up-1529623442

  6. Nice fake hair, you mean. No 46 year old man has such luxuriant black hair without “assistance.” The hair under his drooping fake eyebrow shows his natural colour and thickness, and is appropriate for his age.

    1. ” Nice fake hair…fake eyebrows ” etc
      Yes, agreed most guys really don’t have time or the devotion that it takes to dye hair etc. But dying hair is one thing if you have to look the part, as an actor. Ever notice the different hairstyles that an actor like Brad Pitt has? He gets millions of $…. most guys would dye or shave bald for money that Brad gets.

      To go ALL FULL FAKE EYEBROW, WITH GRAVITY SUCH AS IT IS, AND THE HEAT OF GLOBAL WARMING CHANCING A SLIDE-DOWN, YOU HAVE TO BE A FULL IDIOT TO DO THIS SORT OF MAQUILLAGE.

      I will never get over the sight of this fake PM losing an eyebrow. It is funny and TRAGIC!

      1. And a little disturbing for a dude to paste on eyebrows…Regarding the CBC headline, they could have truncated it to “trudeau fined 100$ for being too slow” full stop

  7. I am surprised he hasn’t blamed Harper.
    But it’s not like he’d ever be embarrassed about anything he does. He’s never made a mistake in his life that wasn’t someone else’s fault. Such a douche.

  8. Any “fine” for this infraction is meaningless to Trudeau.

    I’m fine with the fine being $100. or even $10. as it exposes them for what they’ve become, and that damage is less easy to overcome than the damage to his fiscal state.

    When people in the real world are typically fined hundreds of dollars by both the judicial system, and then by insurance companies for the meaningless infractions of adjusting a radio, as it’s “distracted” … I doubt the imbecile is aware of how he is spoken of in the coffee shops of the nation.

    The Supreme Court of Canada looks at the piece of shit Constitution of Canada, the one that says interprovincial transport will be unimpeded, then decides that interprovincial transport of beer is an infraction worth taxing as “look what it’d do” to milk quotas, and “free expression” doesn’t mean free speech… we can simply make up out of whole cloth any other rules you need to.

    $100 for unethical conduct? really.

  9. Hm, what with all these negative comments I guess there isn’t much sense in my starting a crowdfund here to help pay Justin’s fine.

    1. You know… that publicity would be just the ticket.
      or,
      A little spare change for that girl he apologised to for the non crime of being too forward, while the rest of us hesitate now to hold doors open for dykes.

  10. Nothing surprising here.
    Expecting any change where a liberal let alone one named Trudeau would do anything more than talk alot about ethics is a waste of time.
    Both he and Sophie expect to be treated like the kind of royalty that lives under the philosophy of the divine right of kings.

  11. *
    oh, c’mon… everybody knows the government is there
    to save you…

    “We’ve received information from a firearms expert
    and that information was compelling to say the least,”
    said Crown prosecutor Jim Sawa, who wouldn’t reveal
    what the evidence was
    .

    at least the good guys won this one.

    *

    1. Your beloved JBTs turn out not to be the good guys??????
      Are you feeling alright?

  12. The three reporters sharing this by-line might want to stop and wipe the cum off their chins.

    nationalpost.com/news/politics/why-an-18-year-old-groping-allegation-against-justin-trudeau-is-not-a-metoo-moment

    1. Apologies to Buddy above who posted this link. My link doesn’t seem to be working. No apologies for the language. The “conservative” press should be ashamed.

      1. But a locker room comment that Trump made some 10 years ago is considered an impeachable offense. Evidently, according to the MSM, liberals and lefties are incapable of doing wrong–past, present, and future.

        1. The MSM must have gone through Trump’s past with a fine tooth comb once he was nominated. The way I look at it is, if this is all that they have managed to dig up, Trump must have led such a squeaky clean life the past decade, especially considering his reputation. I don’t think many of us would be able to emerge from such scrutiny with only having said something indelicate.

  13. The answer Justin would have given if Parliament was still in session
    “uh, uh Mr Speaker I’m entitled to uh sample products from uh, uh Canadian manufacturers, cause uh it promotes uh international trade. And as everyone knows uh part of my job is to uh, uh, show great Canadian products to uh the world. This is just some of the uh sacrifices I make for Canada.”

Navigation