10 Replies to “The Children Are Our Future.”

  1. they sure used a lot of words to say they no longer will tolerate free speech.

  2. Any expressed thought that is contrary to the narrative of the left wing, SJW, BLM, LBGQTXMFP… etc, is considered hate speech.
    And subsequent gatherings of these types where a free thinker may be scheduled to speak is an implementation of their intent for violence to silence them.
    However, they need to be careful cause once the free thinker is silenced en masse by force, they tend to push back.
    Just sayin

  3. Thing is, the average young person, who must by nature have some degree (no pun intended) of (safe) rebelliousness in order to leave the nest, has had nothing to protest against for generations.
    I do not include Islamic expansion here, because these children are at least smart enough to avoid things that will hurt them. So, as they always do, they choose targets that (generally) will not retaliate with force.
    What better than conservatives – parental figures who won’t kill them, (unfortunately).

  4. It is sooo obvious to me that leftards are the true intolerant bigots in today’s society. They OPENLY and ENTHUSIASTICALLY collaborate to practice race-baiting and identity politics, along with violence and hatred towards anyone with an opposing view. Their response to any comment is always directly determined by the color/racial/partisan status of that commenter.
    It is time the right took a cue from our successes and start calling out ALL leftards as the truly intolerant haters they are.
    It worked for us when it came time to point out who the REAL purveyors of FAKE NEWS were.
    Racist. bigoted, lying pigs that they are.

  5. The writer on hotair.com commented on the bad writing. How true. Unwittingly, the writer of the Wellesley student editorial got this one right:
    “Shutting down rhetoric that undermines the existence and rights of others is not a violation of free speech; it is hate speech.”
    Yes, shutting down rhetoric that the writer thinks “undermines the existence and rights of others” (such as what this very editorial tries to do) is indeed hate speech, not just a violation of free speech.

  6. Non-progressives are always overreacting. Progressives aren’t demanding control over very many things at all. In fact only three Itty-bitty things: what you say, what you do, and what you think. For your own good and the good of the collective. Please, thank you and or else…!
    Any questions? Shut up, they explained.

  7. Why the quibbling about grammar and meaning, we all know grammar is a white colonial racist construct.

  8. The only thing missing is a backdrop of a black swastika on red flag and the author wearing g a Brown inform replete with Jack boots n spurs, carrying a baton.
    Bring it on Libtards,….my father knew how to deal with you bastards…and I listened – very carefully.

Navigation