13 Replies to “Judicial Watch”

  1. Or Huma could just email…pick a server, any server, but she might have to stay in the closet!

  2. Why bother ? They’re all gonna take the 5th … or end up ‘committing suicide’ in some questionable manner … I believe the Democraps call it … ‘transparency’ … you know … as in ‘the most transparent administration in the history of the world’ !!!

  3. I read it differently. The woman had already taken up too much time and so Huma was doing what she is supposed to do: keep the line moving so as many people can speak to Hillary as possible. It looked rude but when dealing with people like that you sometimes have to be.

  4. Ahhhh ha ha ha ha ha … Your apologetics on behalf of Hill and Huma are laughable. Arrogance and imperiousness is a trait these two heridans share.

  5. That the authorities wanted evidence under oath from HRC underlings has been circulated for a while. I guess this is official confirmation. It’s hilarious to hear the desperate defense of Hillary that messages were unclassified “at the time she read them.” Another underling has already taken the 5th when asked if he removed classification markings on her emails. The net is closing in, Mayor Giuliani has stated they are very close to referring charges to the AG, that all the evidence given under oath by Huma an others will in fact be made public. Hillary says she’s not worried. Did I just hear a dog bark?

  6. Judge Sullivan said:
    Those drips have amounted to “at least a ‘reasonable suspicion’ ”
    ‘reasonable suspicion’ ” ??
    Hillary has shoveled more shit under the radar than any of us lower echelons could push in several lifetimes, even if we were selling classified information.
    ‘reasonable suspicion’ ” That is just too funny…

  7. Ahhhh ha ha ha ha ha..

    She was just helping Hillary to keep those low information voters moving-
    Push them out the door,
    ‘Stop talking and get the hell out there and vote.’

  8. Touchy, touchy.
    Very easy to be misread on this blog, as we all know from experience.
    I don’t like either Hillary or Huma. (I’m only living long enough to see Trump win.)
    I would have been annoyed with the stupid lady who took too much time and thought a hug was appropriate in a crowd like that and definitely would have moved her on, but maybe with a smile. (I doubt Huma ever smiles.)
    One stops to talk and gets a hug, and then everyone thinks they’re entitled.
    Also, didn’t Hillary look tired to you?
    (And Kenji, next time try not to jump to conclusions without a bit of evidence.)

  9. Fair-enough … I did jump on you without sufficient cause. Please accept my apology.
    However … there is always a polite way to handle things such as Hillary’s reception line. And politeness and social decorum are “learned” and “practiced” … none of which is evident in these two Wenches. This reminds me of having her Secret Service agents bulldoze reporters with a rope. Not even the Pope treats well wishers with such disdain. Although it IS fairly evident that Hillary thinks herself more important than the Pope

  10. Thanks.
    Personally I’ve never seen a photo of Huma smiling, and not sure she could.
    I find her creepy, and I might be unfair but then look who she is married to as well as her questionable connections.

  11. Gellen. Huma works simultaneously for Clinton personally, her’s and Bill’s Foundation and the State Dept, as a “special government employee.” More evidence rules only apply to the little people with these appartchiks seeking power.

Navigation