Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Pilgrim's Progress
How Not To Become A Millenial
Trump The Establishment
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
I was still hearing that 4 chan crap on my local radio station less than 2 hours ago.
Anything but the truth the media party, Librano party and the RCMP party don’t want you to hear.
It’s still going on CFRA. Good grief. We even got some feminist prof from BC to explain it all to us and how this was just like the (muslim) Lapen in the Montreal mass killing of women.
So now it is nasty white males guilty of just not enough feminism. Funny how he appeared to attack everything in his path, not swerving to avoid men.
How the h3ll can these people still be employed if they suck at their jobs this badly? Seriously.
It is called publik sector employment, it is like the real employment except for the qualifications and skills.
4chan is brilliant. They determined that the attacker was a little too ethnic to be portrayed as a white supremacist and the media might not buy it. But a misogynist loser – now that’s the ticket.
We now have some authority figure on the raadio explaining how all people on 4chn are criminal or crazy misoginists. They’ll ban it and then move on the 8chan to ban Q. Conspiracy.
Terrible tragedy. I was listening to the coverage on CBC and right on queue an “expert” came on to explain that capturing the individual alive provides an excellent opportunity to question them and to determine why these people do these sorts of things. I have heard this every time someone is captured. I recall Justin Trudeau’s words about terrorism “if we could only understand them better” [my paraphrasing]. The question I have is “what have we learned?”. We have hundreds of these people in custody but we seem to need more of them to determine why they commit such acts of horror? Maybe, if we just executed them, the potential criminals would learn something – that we aren’t going to put up with that type of behavior. Instead, we hashtag.
“Maybe, if we just executed them”
Are you seriously proposing giving the power to execute people to idiot sock-puppets like Zoolander (who made euthanasia legal, flooded the land with head choppers, and has destroyed the natural human right to free speech) and his puppet masters with their arm up his ass?
Better off flying them over Ellesmere Island. Give them a Parachute and their liberty for as long as they can keep it. It is always better to maintain the high ground and kill them with kindness.
Yes, I keep on hearing media types and authority figures asking what was the motive.
They’ve got the bloke who did it, why not ask him? It’ll take 30 seconds:
“OK you’re done, why did you do it”?
“‘Cos I hate (whatever)”
Why haven’t they done that yet? Or can the publc not be trusted with the truth.
Yes, I keep on hearing media types and authority figures asking what was the motive.
They’ve got the bloke who dd it, why not ask him? It’ll take 30 seconds:
“OK you’re done, why did you do it”?
“‘Cos I hate (whatever)”
Why haven’t they done that yet? Or can the publc not be trusted with the truth.
whuts da motivvv?
to kill.
that’s it, begins and ends there. to kill. ‘experts’ and ‘authorities’ keep trying to find ‘motive’ as if theyre dealing with *rational* individuals whose motive to commit fraud was financial, or violence with revenge as motive.
this one is like so many other ‘motivvvvs’, to kill. the law has not caught up with this simple but sadly common explanation.
Don’t go to Canada for Canadian news.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-24/he-wasnt-social-person-profile-toronto-van-killer-emerges
Canonymouse;
Thanks for that profile — too bad the reporter didn’t indicate if they had learned his religion. Probably more authentic than the CBC 4chan riddled report. Makes me wonder if he was a plant by someone else controlling him. Although his behaviour in front of the cop suggests he wanted to die-by-cop.
Is there evidence he drove the van to the spot it was parked in when the cops showed up? The building he was parked next to when the altercation with the cop happened appeared to have Arabic writing on it’s sign. There was also another report of a car fleeing the scene that had been driven to an underground parking lot and had aroused the interest of the cops.
Given that we still don’t know the name of the driver of the Humboldt Broncos’ collision I suspect we won’t be getting much information out of the officials about this guy for a long time.
I am sick of that stereotypical profiling — anybody who is not a party animal gets labeled a “loner” — My guess is 60% of Canadians could be labeled that way under the right circumstances. Someone commits a crime and they examine the person’s psyche to figure out what is “different” about them, that way ensuring that we can confirm that he is not like us. Really, the media and after-the-fact analyzers are very predictable in their observations. What some detail about his being a closet conservative come out. My latest theory is that this is a politically motivated terror attack (likely done by someone involved in the religion of Peace), and that the guy is using a phony name. His motive? He does not like non-believers.
I have taken a closer look at his profile and now I wonder if he was not be manipulated by someone else. He seems a bit vulnerable intellectually. Maybe time will tell.
The strategy is to obfuscate confound and stonewall with the facts. It’s the Canadian way. We apparently can’t handle the truth.
The same thing happens in the justice system. Why is it that there is a publication ban on almost every trial?
These are an outrage in an open transparent democracy. What does the government have to hide?
http://www.yvonhache.com/albumPhotos/kap/Moncton/Moncton_2015-10-15/photos/IMG_0773m.jpg
It seems, like New Brunswick, Canada is as transparent as the Petitcodiac River.
Poor Canucks, not so illustrious progeny of the Bended-Knee Loyalist.
Canadians eat Government Crap with a smile!
“If you kill your enemies, they win”
It is such a huge relief to know we have avoided handing him a victory.
I don’t get it. What exactly did the media get wrong? How does a nutcase like Faith Goldy know they got it wrong?
“I don’t get it.”
What else is new?