44 Replies to “Dead Men(and some boys)Tell The Tale”

  1. Drip, drip, drip…the truth about the medium and long term adverse affects of the mandated covid shots is slowly revealed. Hopefully, counteracting the diseases and disabilities caused by the shots will move faster.

    1. Why do you suppose that day 3 after the “vaccine” is the most likely time for death to occur relative to “vaccine” induced myocarditis? The graph he shows is stunning.

      1. Not sure but I hope someone is looking into the cause. To my knowledge, the contents of the shots and full access to data has not been given to researchers. Only heavily redacted data that the regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies were forced to release.

        Researchers seem to be having to do the equivalent of reverse engineering to find out what is going on with the covid shots.

        1. LC
          All it takes is a good look at what Dr Ryan Cole has pulled outa cadavers on a regular basis since early to mid 2021.

          4 ft long blood clots are unexplainable … uhuh.
          Funny that they are only EVER found in those that are 3+ vaxxed.

  2. He did accidentally say the word twice, so he might be canceled. Killer Marmot?

  3. “The individual is no longer…no longer.” That’s about it isn’t it?
    Your government deliberately lied and continues to lie about C19, ‘safety measures’ and the ‘vaccine’.
    It’s only happening because we let them. Sure they made a monumental effort to squelch truth seekers and they didn’t did they? So…

  4. It was very effective but I feel like people misunderstood what exactly it was effective at doing. Once they made it mandatory I knew exactly what it was they meant and knew I’d been had.

  5. So how did the spike protein get in the blood stream? Vaccines are supposed to be delivered into the muscle. I was forced to take the mRNA “vaccine” in order to cross the border. I heard Dr. Campbell’s advice, on this site, to make sure that the needle was aspirated before injection and I made sure that advice was followed. Both of the women delivering the shot thought it odd that I insisted upon that but both were happy enough to go along with it. So far, so good. Thanks Dr. Campbell.

  6. Move along — Nothing to see here except:
    Guillain-Barré syndrome
    Acute disseminated encephaloymelitis (“Characterized by a brief but widespread attack of inflammation in the brain and spinal cord that damages myelin – the protective covering of nerve fibers,” )
    Transverse myelitis
    Encephalitis/ myelitis / encephalomyelitis / meningoencephalitis / meningitis / encepholaphathy
    Convulsions / seizures
    Stroke
    Narcolepsy
    Cataplexy
    Anaphlyaxis
    Acute myocardial infarction
    Myocarditis/pericarditis
    Autoimmune diseases including Autoimmune Hepatitis / immune-mediated hepatitis, small fiber neuropathy
    and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS)
    Adult Sudden Death Syndrome
    Pregnancy and birth adverse outcomes
    Acute demyelinating diseases
    Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)—a rare and potentially fatal skin disorder
    Myalgic encephalomyelitis
    Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
    Thrombocytopenia
    Ischemia of the deep retinal capillary plexus
    Acute macular neuroretinopathy
    Retinal vein occlusions
    Disseminated intravascular coagulation
    Venous thromboembolism
    Arthritis and arthralgia
    Kawasaki disease
    Immune-mediated Hepatitis
    Vaccine enhanced disease
    Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in children
    VAIDS (vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome)
    IgG4-Related Disease
    New arrhythmias
    New seizure disorders
    New chorea movement disorder…, and more

  7. All sorts of red flags are raised here…

    1. One of the authors is Peter McCullough, who has repeatedly made false and misleading statements of COVID.
    2. The name of the journal that this article has been submitted to was not mentioned.
    3. The paper has not yet passed peer review. Given that the preprint showed up on July 17, the review process might have just begun.

    In these cases, the best response is not “Gotcha!” but rather “Better wait and see.”

    1. Hey KM. This is too FUNNY. Let me get this straight. You’re ACCUSING a WORLD RENOWNED TOP IN THEIR FIELD CARDIOLOGIST of “making false and misleading statements about COVID”? You can’t attack the paper (which incidentally INVOLVES vax induced fatal heart damage) so you do a BASELESS dirty rat drive by attacking his character. What’s Your Proof??? Put up OR SHUT UP. It seems you’re accusing him of something YOU DO HERE in every comment you make. You’re a joke. GTH Commie POS.

          3. Such tough guys on the internet. I always get this picture of some fat slob pounding back Doritos.

          4. Look who’s cyber brave. Hiding behind a stupid “handle” and accusing others. Killer Marmot? I’d just use a shotgun on pesky varmints.

          5. I’m still wondering how you’re going to shut me up. Telling someone on the internet to shut up is among the most futile and idiotic things anyone can do.

          6. I’ll shut you up as far as I need by scrolling past your posts. Works for me. Everyone else is on their own. Do you assume everyone is talking to you, by the way? Shut up and line up for your boosters was generically meant for anyone who would gladly tell me that.

          7. “I’ll shut you up as far as I need by scrolling past your posts.”

            Sounds fine to me. Except you don’t, do you? You insist on making vacuous, childish insults without addressing the points made. You can’t help yourself. Someone has an opinion you don’t want to hear so you lash out.

        2. I believe ” heath feedback” is deliberately trying to discredit McCullough. There is a lot of that. Undoubtedly most experts are not 100% right all the time. Anyone who speaks out against the vax is a target. I think there is sufficient evidence at this point to confirm that the vaxes are not safe for many people, and they also are not particularly effective. Edward Dowd is a very credible source: https://palexander.substack.com/p/ed-dowd-drops-bombshell-covid-vaccine

          1. Health Feedback is very clear about what McCullough said and why they think it’s either misleading, unsupported, or outright false.

            Which of the their nine claims do you take issue with?

          2. @ Killer. I pretty much disagree with all of them. My point, however, is that because McCullough goes against the ” Covid vaccines are safe and effective” narrative, he becomes a target. I believe McCullough’s claims are correct. Often, there are scientific studies supporting alternative views. I am shocked that Health Feedback is claiming the vaxes are safe for pregnant women — lots of evidence they are not.

          3. @ Killer What study is this based on? “Large-scale trials show that COVID-19 vaccines don’t increase the risk of negative pregnancy.” There were no large scale studies when they started recommending for pregnant women and I am not aware of any since. Shouldn’t thry reference their claim?
            Also Mucullough indicated they did not test for effectiveness in stopping transmission before rolling this out to everyone and their cousin. Absolutely true and their ” pretense” that the vaxes might stop transmission was deliberately misleading. There was no reason to assume they would stop transmission. Total hit piece on McCullough.

      2. After further research, I made a discovery.

        Your “world renowned top in their field cardiologist” has been decertified by the American Board of Internal Medicine, and further has been terminated as Editor-In-Chief of the journal Cardiorenal Medicine and Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine.

        1. KM, everyone who objects to the “approved narrative” has been discredentialed, cancelled, or otherwise marginalized. Dr. McCullough is one the most published physicians, clinicians and researchers in the history of medicine, until he dared mention the emperor’s clothes may be missing.

          Galileo was treated similarly, although I suspect you wouldn’t defend that. What I fail to understand is how you cannot see the parallels.

          1. It is possible that McCullough is being censored purely for having unpopular opinions.

            But I don’t think so. Some of his public claims are clearly at odds with the bulk of the scientific evidence. And yes, I think he does have a duty to fairly represent the scientific evidence when communicating with the public.

            As an example, he claimed that the original vaccines were pulled because they were “completely useless.” That’s complete garbage. They were pulled because newer vaccines were developed that better handled with the newer strains, but the original vaccines were still of value.

            By the way, the number of papers is not a particularly accurate measure of a researcher’s worth. McCullough had his name on about 70 papers in 2021. It beggars belief that he contributed significantly to most of them, but rather was added to the authors list as a kind of honorific, a practice I abhor.

    2. How many boosters have you taken? Will you continue to boooooost even as it becomes more and more clear it’s at best useless and at worst a kill shot?

    3. KM

      You’re a colossal JOKE.
      …and utterly Ignorant.
      BTW: How many jabs have you had..??

      1. Perhaps you’re the joke for naively accepting shoddy evidence because it reinforces what you wish to be true.

    1. A marmot is a fine-looking, intelligent animal that can survive in the high alpine where few others can.

  10. Scotland’s hospitals are in a right mess with a significant increase in admissions and it’s SUMMER. Why? Delayed effects of Covid vacc perhaps. See Daily Mail.

    1. Your post is typical of those opposed to COVID vaccines; speculation presented as “yet more evidence that vaccines are dangerous.”

      But there are many potential reasons why there’s an uptick in admissions. For example, Scotland is having one of its hottest summers on record, and I doubt there’s a lot of A/Cs in Scotland. Or it may be the delayed effects of COVID itself, which can cause lasting damage to vital organs. Or it may be that many Scots avoided regular medical checkups during the pandemic, resulting in medical problems not being treated at an early stage. The list is endless, and the true cause or causes can only be determined through proper research.

      1. Then again, maybe it’s the vaccine. There is a problem when medical people refuse to consider this.

        1. No one has ever claimed vaccines are 100% safe. People’s immune systems are too varied to make such a claim.

          But there is study after study, many of them of high quality (large scale, randomized, double-blind, controlled), which show that the COVID vaccines are both effective and acceptably safe. Like this…

          https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577

          Such studies mean that researchers *HAVE* considered the safety of the vaccines. It’s just so happens that the evidence shows they are.

          2. KM, two things:

            1. How a vaccine can be called “effective” when most of the vaxxed population have contracted the virus they were vaccinated against eludes me, and anyone applying pre Covid standards. “Less serious” is mental gymnastics to avoid the obvious.

            2. The fact that Dr. John Clauser is now in the process of being cancelled for questioning the physics of climate models when he was in 2022 awarded the Nobel Prize in physics, FFS, reveals science has devolved into cash infected politics.

          3. 1. Numerous studies showed the vaccines did lessen the likelihood of transmission, although not to 0%. Studies also showed that the vaccines lessened the severity of the symptoms when you do contract the disease.

            https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552389/

            2. The only cancellation of Clauser I can find is that the IMF cancelled a talk by him. That’s not going to hurt him much, and might even garner him publicity. At any rate, it has nothing to do with the issue at hand.

          4. VOWG: I notice you never, ever engage in the facts of the debate. You simply throw out insults, as if that’s going to make your beliefs more valid or something. Pro tip: denigrating the other side doesn’t actually make you more right.

  11. Funny that Pfizer admitted under questioning by the UK parliament that they did not even study effects on transmission. Just lucky, I guess? Also, proving a negative is impossible, and not worthy of anyone serious.

    Climate science is a big money game, just like Covid “science”. It has everything to do with it.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation