Safe and Effective®

Safe and Effective 39 Comments

Toronto Sun;

A safety monitoring system flagged that U.S. drugmaker Pfizer Inc and German partner BioNTech’s updated COVID-19 shot could be linked to a type of brain stroke in older adults, according to preliminary data analyzed by U.S. health authorities.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said on Friday that a CDC vaccine database had uncovered a possible safety issue in which people 65 and older were more likely to have an ischemic stroke 21 days after receiving the Pfizer/BioNTech bivalent shot, compared with days 22-44.

An ischemic stroke, also known as brain ischemia, is caused by blockages in arteries that carry blood to the brain.

I’d be comparing the frequency of ischemic strokes 21 days after with 21 days prior, but that’s just me.

39 Replies to “Safe and Effective®”

      1. Are bears catholic? Is Plaid really worse than ludicrous? Are trannies that hate their new bodies really closet transphobes?

        These are the things worth studying.

        Vaccine effects, why bother – it’s all good.

    2. I’m mostly concerned about what happens 665 days after getting the jab …. something tells me that I’m not quite out of the woods yet …

      1. Kenji, 5 to 10 years I fear. There was info on the possibility of stroke before the shots were started it was ignored. There was a hell of a lot of info that was ignored. People need to hang for their crimes.

      2. BSE can take up to forty years to manifest itself. Just saying since we’re talking about spike proteins.

      3. From the FLCCC, this video is based on Dr Been’s and Dr Marik’s suggestions for detox. They insist taking steps to promote your body’s function of self cleaning, autophagy, is the only way to clear the break down products of the genetic vaccines.
        Here is a link explaining autophagy. Sorry for it’s length, you can skip the technical detail, but they suggest ideas to mitigate the spike protein.
        https://odysee.com/@FrontlineCovid19CriticalCareAlliance:c/weekly_webinar_July12:d

  3. I guess Pfizer has something in the pipeline to treat the side effects they created for those still lucky enough to be alive and have their wallets picked again?

  4. “… more likely to have an ischemic stroke 21 days after receiving the Pfizer/BioNTech bivalent shot, compared with days 22-44.”

    Is that a bit like saying not many people die in their 100’s?

      1. be interesting to do a followup on those twitter shotters and see if they are still around?

  5. That sounds ominous that there is a measurable difference between prior to 21 days and after, but then again, there is a large sample in this experiment to enable that measurement.

    So many possible questions. How common were these strokes before the jab as to now across all ages, let alone splitting that up by age group? Or how many jabs does it take before you start seeing this happen?

    Data mining tools now exist to answer these questions.

  6. Normally a control group would have been retained to compare. That would be best.
    Pfizer famously scrubbed its control group because it felt that it would have been unjust not to inject all members of the control group.

    1. Isn’t it the government health authorities of various jurisdictions that control the databases of jab details? Afterall, how do they know who apply restrictions to? Not that they haven’t been scrubbing and spoiling these databases recently given what is happening.

      1. A useful study controls for many variables (pre-existing, age, sex, …). So using entire population with/without is something but it is not the same as a study group.

    2. Re excuse for destruction of control group. Pfizer lied about that too. They have demonstrated time and again they have no regard for human life. Just power and profit

    3. I am part of the current control group that “they” are constantly lying about. We, the unvaxxed are not dying from “covid”, in fact we are rarely sick.

      1. My whole work group, that are all Quaxxed, has had the Rona at least twice, post-jab. They are all younger than me, 20 to 30 years younger.
        All were really sick, some taking 3 weeks to get over it.
        Thing look bleak for the jabbed. SDA sock puppets Allah, Dummy, KM, hurry, go get your boosters, as many as possible. Enjoy your Lab Rat existence!

      1. Personally, I think turdo is getting shots of bull&hit. After all, with all the BS he spews on a regular basis he must need a refill.

      2. I agree DB, there is no way they took any of the shots if they did they would be having the same problems that are being covered up in canada but are showing up all over the world, death and serious injury.

      3. I’ve watched Justin getting his shots. No isolation of the muscle, just stick it in and press the plunger.
        Recommended method by every physician never.
        It wasn’t even good theatre. Video almost made me barf.

        https://youtu.be/xb3hMV5H8dI

        1. As a young buck I received weekly shots for hay fever. Later on they graduated to monthly injections. This went on for probably 10 years or so. After being on the receiving end of literally hundreds of injections, none of Blackie’s look anything like what I’m familiar with. I call bullshit, too.

  12. If you haven’t seen Dr Campbell’s interview of Dr Robert Clancy, immunologist from NSW, it’s worth it. he gives a coherent explanation for what went wrong from the view of 30,000 feet.
    It boils down to Quality Consistency issues and more importantly lack of control.
    The mRNA product’s are not controllable. You can’t control the dosage, you can’t control the volume of antigen produced, you can’t control where it goes in the body, you can’t control how long it is present in the body………

  13. Carbon footprint = useless eaters.

    Died suddenly = fewer useless eaters

    Adverse effects = Making bank for Big Pharmageddon

    Thus endeth today’s lesson

  14. If true why isn’t Israel who boasted about having the highest vaccination rate experiencing the same “complications”? Maybe they are…I don’t know.
    Just spitballin’.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation