Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
Expect a firey speech from Pee-pee denouncing this.
based on your ridiculous comments it appears you are comfortable with censorship. Keep drinking the liberal kool_aid imbecile
No fiery speeches … The new normal continues until there are.
A typical comment from a loyal Conservative panty-liner. Full of Pee-Pee.
As stated by a sell-out to the socialists. That would be you, Jamie.
“As stated by a sell-out to the socialists. That would be you, Jamie.”
No, the sell-outs would be the ones who blindly voted CPC yet again because Orange Man Bad.
Poilievre couldn’t jump on that bandwagon fast enough, in typical Liberal Lite fashion. Idiot.
Just keep on voting for yellow cowards, cgh. Blue ties or red ties – when it comes to your freedoms, there’s no difference.
My take on the comment is that he doesn’t expect the Cons to do anything about it, not that he supports it.
Expect cbc to be cleaning out there desks had you drones not voted liberal again
Rex, you and Wally are exhibiting some stunned c*ntitude.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ef3dbc592d67872a01465f67956080de509e4fe42f93e16832a840af2de3b53e.jpg
Maddening that evil Liberal racist Party hacks control everything in this place, and especially maddening that mewling little pissants here vote for these leftist authoritarian bigots!
The CBC exists by the gun. It is a thug, existing as a thug and it is no other thing.
That’s why there’s Rumble.
How long before they try to eliminate Rebel News?
There’s a fair few alternative news sites, expect similar efforts in the near future.
Kate: I tried posting this via Opera browser and got a “forbidden ” message. I am switching to Vivaldi, which seems to work better (but has some annoying quirks)
Opera Chinee!
There’s several other platforms for presenting your information. YouTube has become such a garbage dump anyway. I’ve never heard of Real Talk Politiks before but I’ll keep an eye out for it now.
Once a conservative learns how to delete unwanted YouTube channels (click onto the three vertical dots), then YouTube sorts our those channels which one wants, and shows only those channels that one is interested in. I’m interested in Canadian conservative commentary, Christisn movies, dog videos, the Israel, point of view on the wars, and flatpicking and three-finger picking guitar solos. That’s an odd combination, but that’s all that shows up now on my YouTube.
The omly thing that is difficult to control is the one row of hard news that pops up every often. Yes I eliminated all the lefty web networks (the CBC, CTV, NBC, ABC, CBC, MBNBC, and Global). The only thing left on my hard news row is CP24 and the occasional FOX News show.
So don’t say YouTube is a garbage dump. It is not. It’s a quite rich medium and provides an alternative to6o the corrupt news cartel. Btw this is why cable TV is disappearing.
Makes sense, CBC is the main channel for Canada’s Ministry of Truth. Of course they will push ONLY gov’s point of view which is wrapped as the only one acceptable gov approved true Truth. Everything else is unacceptable and all prols have to fight it tooth and nail.
I just went on You Tube and punched in the Ceeb.
Stuff on King Jugears and King Carney.
I left a couple thumbs down because – not surprisingly and just like their website – you can’t leave a comment.
The CBC is a state owned conflict of interest attempting to compete in a market that either hates it or is uninterested in it. Being existentially tied to the LPC, its mission is to denigrate or extinguish all opposing speech from the so-called “right”. Its “private sector”, state-subsidized clones out-compete it despite their almost identical LPC affiliation. The CBC’s relationship to the state is now identical to the CCP “police stations” in Canada intimidating the Chinese diaspora.
I agree with most of your thoughts here. However, CBC is not in a conflict of interest in attempting to compete in a market. It’s doing its best to destroy any such market. And it has as its government agency enabler the CRTC which blocks access to any supposed Canadian information market.
This isn’t a mere conflict of interest. It’s an open war by CBC against the Canadian public to eliminate anything resembling choice.
What is amusing is this.
“The CBC cited University of Ottawa associate professor Elizabeth Dubois…”
You can always find some worthless, entitled university twit to justify anything. It’s not called the U Zero for no reason.
// Apparently CBC pointed to an AI video of Ronald Reagan that was not properly labeled as such, prompting YouTube to justify the takedown for violations of its policies on “spam, deceptive practices and scams,” which – they could have simply issued a warning for and allowed Real Talk Politiks to correct instead of completely disappearing the account. //
Youtube’s decision. Live by disinfo; fall by it.
Meanwhile, it is refreshing to see precise language devoid of smarm, at least on the Liberal side:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rearm-europe-deal-canada-carney-interview-1.7545303
The CBC would have been dead decades ago if that were the case.
No, only “disinformation” that our meddling statist totalitarian goose-stepping one-party halfwits disapprove of is reason for not just taking a video down, but erasing an entire channel.
And you nod along with smug approval. Says an awful lot about you, none of it good.
Find your cramhole and cram it, Dizzy.
PM Control Freak doesn’t want to acknowledge that we’re protected by the mostly benevolent Colossus to our south, not the diverse collection of authoritarian countries that make up most of Eurogay NATO.
And to paraphrase Uhtred, geography is destiny and destiny is all.
//the mostly benevolent Colossus to our south, //
Easter Greetings
“Happy Easter to all, including the Radical Left Lunatics who are fighting and scheming so hard
to bring Murderers, Drug Lords, Dangerous Prisoners, the Mentally Insane, and well known MS-13 Gang Members and Wife Beaters,
back into our Country,”
“Happy Easter also to the WEAK and INEFFECTIVE Judges and Law Enforcement Officials
who are allowing this sinister attack on our Nation to continue, an attack so violent that it will never be forgotten!”
One of a number of such exercises in benevolence
Can anyone explain why my tax dollars are used to pay for anyone’s personal opinions in the MSM?
My taxes paying for so called news is absurd, me being forced to fund some fool’s opinions is obscene.
Ask a liberal; Should the Alberta government fund Ezra Levant and Rebel News to produce and broadcast their personal opinions?
If not, why not?
What could go wrong?
“Content Farm”? “Content Farm”? … where have I heard that post-modern, high-tech, term before? Hmmm ? Ohhhhh yeahhhh … SHE … used it, to explain why SHE lost to Donald Trump in 2016. Yes, SHE protested … HER loss was caused by … “Macedonian content farms”. Yep. The Russians flooded the internets with anti-Hillary messaging from a darkened room in Macedonia. Trump “colluded” with Macedonian content farmers … PAID by Putin, of course. Facepalm.
This is nothing more than a post-modern, high-tech lynching of conservative thought … to borrow a phrase from Clarence Thomas.
I shut down my you tube account during their covid censorship bonanza, I refuse to watch anything I can avoid. Frankly I am sick of the media being the information stasi.
So file a complaint with the Human Rights Commission….just like the other side does. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms only allows censorship relative to laws already in place. Obviously, this content creator didn’t violate any laws on the books. AND, the initiation of the censorship comes from a State subsidized entity.
There is a great opportunity for a Civil suit. And, since you have the names of the individuals that initiated this, you can name them individually in the complaint to the HRO, and word the complaint so as to have the professional liability coverage of the CBC excluding coverage to the individual(s) as an intentional act. Take their savings. It’s the only way they are going to learn. With excluded coverage, the individual will have to pay for their own defense. Make the process the punishment for them too…while the plaintiff gets their legal representation on a 1/3 contingency basis.
Excellent! Yes … go after civilly, every individual at the CBC who initiated this
Rubio just made this announcement; Looks like Carney won’t be able to visit the US anymore if they are serious about this.
Today, I am announcing a new visa restriction policy that will apply to foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States. It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on U.S. citizens or U.S. residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on U.S. soil. It is similarly unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States.
wha wha wha well hers a suggestion: mebbe juuuuuuuust mebbe *someone* out there a think tank or pool of CONservatist ‘investors’ *somehow* put together the wherewithal TO START UP AN INDEPENDENT video platform aaaaaaaaaand ALL those banished from YT are free of the thuggery found there. its called the internet. or is that interNOT?